MANGINAS, You've Been Warned ! IMG INT - [Warning: Load Times]

[Negentropic]

WARNING

This is an IMAGE & MEDIA INTENSIVE thread, not intended for the meek or those in love with their own dubious notions of 'sanity.' If you do not want to wait a few minutes for the page to load or you have an older junk computer, please do not visit this thread.

Quote:Just look around. As a percentage of all single income families where there is a husband and wife, what is that percentage of families where the woman is the sole income earner?

Almost none.

I mean, do you even KNOW any women who are single income earners for a FAMILY?

And no. It is not a FAMILY when the woman has removed the husband no matter what the guvment likes to say. And no she is not the single income earner when she is getting alimony and child support and guvment welfare.

So the government is interfering in companies to force them to hire more women because women not being 51% is “sexism” and “discrimination” and “oppression of the patriarchy"?

Well young man? Consider these numbers:

War dead - 98% men
Workplace dead - 93% men
Incarcerated - 90% men
Homeless - 90% men
Alimony payers - 99% men
Child support payers - 99% men

Number of women's groups protesting the “oppression of the patriarchy” to get women to be 51% of these six categories?

ZERO!

Number of government departments or sets of legislation designed to force women into being 51% of these six categories?

ZERO!

So any woman you talk to who talks about wanting “equality” who is not publicly campaigning to “end the oppression of the patriarchy” in these six categories is, by definition, a hypocrite.

I recommend you tell her so to her face and do not back down.

This is why we are not going to allow the government a role in our new businesses in the Men's Business Association.

Governments were given a role and they abused it.

We do not seek reform. We seek divorce from the guvment.

We shall govern ourselves thank you very much.


http://www.mensbusinessassociation.com/P...0V0.02.pdf

Quote:But the fact remained that she had chosen me and pursued me over nearly a year I think. So I figured out then that it is not the man who is the real “predator” or “pursuer”. It is actually the woman. I also figured out that it is not the woman who is the “prize”, it is actually the man. This flew in the face of everything I was being told. But as I then
watched other women more closely I could see this was, indeed, the case.

The woman chooses the man she wants to pursue, she puts on the show, she rebuts the other men attracted waiting for the one that she has chosen, and then she manipulates the chosen man to pursue her. If he does not pursue her most women will discard or discount the man because she can not manipulate him if he does not pursue her. If he DOES pursue her then she puts him through a series of “tests” to see how strong she can have
him bond to her and to see how much control over him she has. Just like breaking in a horse in many ways.

So my strategy changed from one of “pursuing girls” to one of being more relaxed about it and letting them come to me. Which was not that often but that was ok by me. I was looking for a wife, not a series of girlfriends.

It was the same with Jennifer. She pursued me. Not the other way around.

Women KNOW about this. But they dare not let men know about it because the maximum domination and control by the woman can only occur if the man is brainwashed into thinking he is the pursuer. If he can be made to “chase
the girl” at an early stage and then be kept “chasing the girl” then he can be easily manipulated and controlled. If he can be convinced that SHE is the prize and he is the “unworthy suitor” who is “lucky to have her” and would be “lost without her” and would “never find another woman like that” then he can be more easily controlled.

The shaming language never ends against men. A woman who is single is “empowered” and “independent” and “successful”. A man who is single is a “loser” and “can’t attract a woman” and “unsuccessful”. Just try it with older men around you. When I used to be married and people would inquire about my life I would say I am a happily married man with four children. I was “well liked”. I have since noticed that if I say “I am a very happily divorced man” you can see the “loser” attitude right away. I must have some “problem” that I could not “keep my wife happy”.

Trust me. It is only like that in the Anglosphere. You do not get the same reactions from people in Germany or eastern Europe. Being divorced is as normal as being married and accepted as such.

http://www.mensbusinessassociation.com/P...0V0.02.pdf

Les Amants, Rene Magritte, 1928






RICHIE HAVENS - Just Like A Woman (1974)




Bob Dylan

Just Like A Woman lyrics
Nobody feels any pain
Tonight as I stand inside the rain
Ev'rybody knows
That Baby's got new clothes
But lately I see her ribbons and her bows
Have fallen from her curls
She takes just like a woman, yes she does
She makes love just like a woman, yes she does
And she aches just like a woman
But she breaks just like a little girl.

Queen Mary, she's my friend
Yes, I believe I'll go see her again
Nobody has to guess
That Baby can't be blessed
Till she finally sees that she's like all the rest
With her fog, her amphetamine and her pearls
She takes just like a woman, yes she does
She makes love just like a woman, yes she does
And she aches just like a woman
But she breaks just like a little girl.

It's was raining from the first
And I was dying there of thirst
So I came in here
And your long-time curse hurts
But what's worse
Is this pain in here
I can't stay in here
Ain't it clear that.

I just can't fit
Yes, I believe it's time for us to quit
When we meet again
Introduced as friends
Please don't let on that you knew me when
I was hungry and it was your world
Ah, you fake just like a woman, yes you do
You make love just like a woman, yes you do
Then you ache just like a woman
But you break just like a little girl.

[h3rm35]

wow... somebody's insecure... It takes a pussy to be afraid of one.

I'm not sure what to say about somebody who seems to be afraid of ALL of them.

---

(07-20-2012 09:35 PM)Negentropic Wrote:  

Quote:Just look around. As a percentage of all single income families where there is a husband and wife, what is that percentage of families where the woman is the sole income earner?

Almost none.

I mean, do you even KNOW any women who are single income earners for a FAMILY?

And no. It is not a FAMILY when the woman has removed the husband no matter what the guvment likes to say. And no she is not the single income earner when she is getting alimony and child support and guvment welfare.

So the government is interfering in companies to force them to hire more women because women not being 51% is “sexism” and “discrimination” and “oppression of the patriarchy"?

Well young man? Consider these numbers:

War dead - 98% men
Workplace dead - 93% men
Incarcerated - 90% men
Homeless - 90% men
Alimony payers - 99% men
Child support payers - 99% men

Number of women's groups protesting the “oppression of the patriarchy” to get women to be 51% of these six categories?

ZERO!

Number of government departments or sets of legislation designed to force women into being 51% of these six categories?

ZERO!

So any woman you talk to who talks about wanting “equality” who is not publicly campaigning to “end the oppression of the patriarchy” in these six categories is, by definition, a hypocrite.

I recommend you tell her so to her face and do not back down.

This is why we are not going to allow the government a role in our new businesses in the Men's Business Association.

Governments were given a role and they abused it.

We do not seek reform. We seek divorce from the guvment.

We shall govern ourselves thank you very much.


http://www.mensbusinessassociation.com/P...0V0.02.pdf

Quote:But the fact remained that she had chosen me and pursued me over nearly a year I think. So I figured out then that it is not the man who is the real “predator” or “pursuer”. It is actually the woman. I also figured out that it is not the woman who is the “prize”, it is actually the man. This flew in the face of everything I was being told. But as I then
watched other women more closely I could see this was, indeed, the case.

The woman chooses the man she wants to pursue, she puts on the show, she rebuts the other men attracted waiting for the one that she has chosen, and then she manipulates the chosen man to pursue her. If he does not pursue her most women will discard or discount the man because she can not manipulate him if he does not pursue her. If he DOES pursue her then she puts him through a series of “tests” to see how strong she can have
him bond to her and to see how much control over him she has. Just like breaking in a horse in many ways.

So my strategy changed from one of “pursuing girls” to one of being more relaxed about it and letting them come to me. Which was not that often but that was ok by me. I was looking for a wife, not a series of girlfriends.

It was the same with Jennifer. She pursued me. Not the other way around.

Women KNOW about this. But they dare not let men know about it because the maximum domination and control by the woman can only occur if the man is brainwashed into thinking he is the pursuer. If he can be made to “chase
the girl” at an early stage and then be kept “chasing the girl” then he can be easily manipulated and controlled. If he can be convinced that SHE is the prize and he is the “unworthy suitor” who is “lucky to have her” and would be “lost without her” and would “never find another woman like that” then he can be more easily controlled.

The shaming language never ends against men. A woman who is single is “empowered” and “independent” and “successful”. A man who is single is a “loser” and “can’t attract a woman” and “unsuccessful”. Just try it with older men around you. When I used to be married and people would inquire about my life I would say I am a happily married man with four children. I was “well liked”. I have since noticed that if I say “I am a very happily divorced man” you can see the “loser” attitude right away. I must have some “problem” that I could not “keep my wife happy”.

Trust me. It is only like that in the Anglosphere. You do not get the same reactions from people in Germany or eastern Europe. Being divorced is as normal as being married and accepted as such.

http://www.mensbusinessassociation.com/P...0V0.02.pdf

note:

post framed in quotations for posterity... in case anyone ends up wondering why there aren't many women in our community again, (and in case the flamer above decides to edit his post when he's called out from the closet.)

[Anarchist]

Negentropic, I agree quite a bit.. Feminism is the new thing, I remember when I was younger they teaching all of us boys in a seperate classroom how we are guys and guys are pigs holding women back from accomplishing anything, and basically we suck. For a week all the girls talked about is how bad guys keep them down, not even thinking they had no clue what they were saying.

All one has to do is look at children and teenagers, though. Guys are rather simple, generally. They think force. If guy A has a problem with Guy B, they fight. The rules are fairly simple; do not mess with another guy. Girls, especially teenagers, are a far different breed. From early on, they will manipulate boys their age to use force against other guys. They manipulate other girls. When one girl has a fight with another girl, you would hardly know it, since they fight behind the backs of others. Whoever wins is obvious, as the other is ostracized and degraded. Females are naturally manipulative, and everyone knows this. Guys do not become that way until they realise they are being manipulated, and then they change with the plan, save for a few smart ones who learn the tactic early on. Of course, this may seem a bit like a disgruntled guy's rant. Better when it comes from the mouth of a female, especially our native Femod April!

There is a reason for the phrase "Behind every great man is an even greater wife." It did not come out of thin air. Now, for a bit of sarcastic fun! This comes from a book of mine, I wanted to copy and paste it from the internet, but the title makes it hard. It is called "Much Ado About Not Much" published by Remnant Publishing House. Good luck sorting through that Shakespeare garbage...

It is completely satirical, but yet seems to hold an ember of truth. If anyone finds the book on amazon or somewhere, please post or pm me a link, I would love to get a hold of more copies. I knew a lady whose daughter knew the guy who is on the cover, his name is withheld for fear of retaliation, but she got some free books from them and I ended up with a copy. The ISBN is 1-59916-420-0, again, if anyone can find it... Enough babbling on my part...

The Woman Did!

A truth I must express, my friend,
So heed my words yet once again,
And I shall teach thee why and when
Our troubles all began!

Pray tell, who ate the apple when
The world was still devoid of sin
And caused a curse upon all men?
Behold, the Woman did!

A bloody war took place at Troy,
As love-struck prince fought for his joy.
What creature had seduced the boy?
The Woman did!

When Job lay sick upon the sod,
With sores and boils across his bod,
Who tempted him to blaspheme God?
The Woman did!

King Arthur's end began, I hear
When he met one named Guinevere!
Who caused his end? Again, I fear
The Woman did!

Mike Tyson's Wealth is nearly Spent,
With Not the Cash To Pay His Rent!
What Devil Robbed His Every Cent?
The Woman Did!

John the Baptist is now dead.
He could have lived for years instead!
Who told the king to take his head?
The Woman did!

"Anakin!" Kenobi cried.
"Has evil now become your guide?"
What pushed him to the darker side?
The Woman did!

King David plotted, schemed, and lied,
But who caused Uriah's homicide,
By bathing naked while outside?
The Woman did!

The Count of Monte Cristo's sin
Was vengeance on his former friend!
Who caused their conflict to begin?
The Woman did!

When Philistines came to his lair,
The strongman Sampson had no hair!
Who told the guards to shave him bare?
The Woman did!

When ash and brimstone pummeled down,
To level Sodom to the ground,
Who disobeyed and turned around?
Behold, the Woman did!

(...as the Master was writing this poem, the head housekeeper suddenly walked in, carrying a large frying pan, and looking quite furious.)

Er...ahem.
Yet then again, in retrospect
When I take time to recollect
I find I have a deep respect,
For Woman.

See now? I have recanted, Ma'am.
How sorry I must say I am.
Now, go cook with that frying pan.
Go fry some fish, or bake some...WHAM!!!!

_____

There is another The Woman Did!, perhaps I will get around to typing it out as well.

[icosaface]

Staying at home, cleaning the house and its contents, preparing, cooking and serving the food seven days a week year in and year out is not work. That is why housewifes don't get pay cheques.

I especially liked the part about the man who wrote the book about the perfect male who created all that is and ordered his creations not to touch a piece of his creation whose only reason for being there was not to be touched. Then when his creations touch the untouchable he disinherits them and condemns them to a life of strife. He does this because he loves them. Let us not forget that it was the woman's fault because the man who wrote the story said she talked to snakes. And it is well known that snakes speak with a forked tongue.

Here is a statistic for you,how many men have given birth to a human being? None, zero. The only human beings who have ever given birth to human beings are the women. Then they have to nurture the new being until such a time as it is ready to fend for itself. Husbands are supposed to help their wives and wives are supposed to help their husbands.

We live in a civilization that manipulates us from womb to tomb. Divide and conquer is the gist of the game.
Together we stand,
divided we fall,
so conquer the divide
and concur with us all.

[Negentropic]

Quote: MANGINA butt-flamer h3rm35 wrote:

wow... somebody's insecure... It takes a pussy to be afraid of one.

post framed in quotations for posterity... in case anyone ends up wondering why there aren't many women in our community again, (and in case the flamer above decides to edit his post when he's called out from the closet.)

Your cum-u-nity? ha ha ha Spare me from your cum-unity will you please Mr. buttplug ? No need to be u-butt-knighted in any way whatsoever with the likes of you, sphincter boy. Go come on someone else's unity, will you ? In fact, go come on somebody else's UNIT, you should be used to that.

Senor No-Balls is back to pose as 'Mr. Macho' while he's passing the Motza balls.

Never mind that his dingleberry skid-marks are wedgied up his fat-ass & the 'pussy' he's not afraid of is 250 pounds of greasy suburban she-male.

Anglo-suckson is not your tongue camel-lover

Go search for your foreskin & testicles in boiling fish & chips grease

You are not i, lucifer's law does not allow androids to be i for more than 3 seconds, got that sonny boy ?

your waxy ears are too hairy to hear wax

sounds do not penetrate pea brain of corn-fed donkey

cocker spaniel climbed up your left buttock & you let it ?

Shame on you motherless pervert !

Repent !! Repent & pull the pubic hairs off your head or spend whole of your waking hours crying for new soccer shorts !



Hey faggot





Since you're the first obviously pussy-whipped MANGINA coming out of the wood-less-works to show your limp-dicked viagra-world colors and basic statistics and the fact that the law is written in the entire Anglosphere to screw you over & media programming is designed 24/hrs a day to screw you over are beyond your retardation level:

Why don't you take it up with the Men's Business Association. The website where the above was posted? Or better yet, CrimesAgainstFathers

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/aust...fault.aspx

http://www.mensbusinessassociation.com/P...0V0.02.pdf


Too much of a little wus to go head-to-head (head to crotch is more your specialty) with angry Australians, huh ?


Two more websites exposing female bigots & their MANGINA supporters:

http://www.avoiceformen.com/

http://www.the-spearhead.com/

The Australian guy who started that association is trying to save other men from getting as fucked over as he was by his wife of 18 years who basically took 95% of everything he had.

When that hopefully happens to your miserable, worthless ass, I'll be laughing my ass off.

I won't be laughing if your 1 inch pecker gets cut off & thrown it in the garbage like Sharon Osbourne & the rest of those witches in the video posted below. I don't wish that even on retarded androids with the IQ of an ice cube.

It's a legal defense and business consulting service.

Quote:The intended purposes of “The Truth Be Told – The Book Part 2” are:
• To educate young men.
This is the most important aspect of this book. We are giving young men all the knowledge they NEED to
ensure they do not meet the same sticky end as me in my marriage.
• To give them the tools to live a great life if that is what they want.
• To put in front of them the opportunity to step out of the current “system” that is intended to enslave them.
• To give them a place to discuss the process of freeing themselves, the Mens Business Association.
• To provide them the infrastructure to start businesses and be successful in business.
• To give them access to men who are known to have been successful in business and give them the ability to be mentored by these men on whatever basis is agreeable to both parties. Many older men like me are quite happy to mentor young men for no fee at all. We are glad to be asked.
• To give them a place to network their businesses with men who are under oath to perform all business transactions honestly and who can be severely punished for breaking that oath.

http://www.mensbusinessassociation.com/P...0V0.02.pdf

Quote:This blatant hypocrisy and double standard can be seen in the case of Sharon Osbourne and her WHOLE FEMALE AUDIENCE laughing about the case of a man whose wife criminally drugged him and then when he was asleep from the criminal drugging she cut off his penis and put it in the garbage disposal. Yes. An entire audience of
women LAUGHED about this.

Do women laugh about women who are drugged and raped? No. They do not.

If you do not believe this happened on NATIONAL TV then please click this link. It is important that you know about these double standards you are facing in your society. Do you think these women have an innate sense of justice?

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/aust...t.aspx#627





Now that you have seen the video. Yes. This is Sharon Osborne, a woman who is married and has a son, LAUGHING about a man being criminally drugged and criminally physically mutilated and attacked in the most vicious and criminal of ways. As one woman says at the end of the piece “if this was a woman we would not be laughing” and even THEN Sharon Osborne continues to make fun of this criminally victimised man.

THAT IS HOW MUCH WOMEN HATE MEN.

DO NOT FORGET THIS FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE.

100% of the women in that audience LAUGHED about a criminally victimised man. It is FUNNY when a woman criminally victimises a man as far as women are concerned. FUNNY. Ok?

Have you got that very clear in your heads that:

IF A WOMAN CUTS OFF YOUR PENIS THE OTHER WOMEN WILL LAUGH AT YOU.

And if you object? They will call YOU a “woman-hater”.

Please let that sink in.

Can you see the level of hypocrisy?

Can you see the double standard?

And remember in Eastern Europe NO WOMAN would laugh at such a thing.

Now. What have FATHERS got to do with all this? Well?

EVERY WOMAN CRIMINAL HAS A FATHER.

All those women in Sharon Osbornes audience have a FATHER.

Jennifer Toal has a FATHER.

I have a FATHER.

Guess what? FATHERS CONDONE their daughters committing crimes. In my case? Even my OWN FATHER condoned child abuse, the abuse of his elderly and ill wife, and the criminal acts against me by his DAUGHTER IN LAW over his OWN SON.

Let THAT sink in for a bit.

1974 at the California Jam. Other artists performing were Eagles, Seals & Crofts, Black Oak Arkansas, Earth Wind & Fire, Rare Earth and the two headliners Deep Purple and Emerson Lake & Palmer.

Ozzy from the legendary Black Sabbath pussy-whipped into submission by that disgusting evil skank.








Ball-buster scene from "Carnal Knowledge" with Jack Nicholson & Ann Margret




the happy couple before the shit hit the fan

photo caption reads: This is what a woman looks like on her 40th birthday when she has a terrible husband who has abused her all her marriage. I am sure you can see the fear and hatred in her eyes from all the abuse she has allegedly suffered.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/aust...fault.aspx

Andrew Peter Nolan facebook letter to dick-slicing witch Sharon Osbourne:

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/Port...sborne.jpg


"Strawman Recapture": Regaining Legal Freedom
October 11, 2010


http://www.henrymakow.com/peter_nolan.html


How come this guy can't even handle one divorce without total disaster and Jeff Rense manages seven and still comes out on top ?


Jeff Rense's 1st Wife Describes his Cheating


"I got an STD from Jeff because of his cheating."

http://www.henrymakow.com/i_got_an_std_f...rense.html

Jeff Rense's Seventh Ex-Wife Speaks Out (Part 1)

http://www.henrymakow.com/jeff_renses_ni...e_spe.html


Sasquatch Rense somehow figured out how to scam the system and not get screwed by it by the time he was in college. How else would any moron get married & divorced 7 times and not end up on skid row ?






Jeff Rense named "Most Flirtatious" in 1963 high school yearbook




http://jeffrense.org/biography/how-old-is-jeff-rense/

http://rense.com/1.mpicons/rensebio.htm


Travolta of Eastern Europe shows you how to do the slapdance




Celtic Rebel - Romance is Dead [1 of 2]: why your socially-engineered love-life sucks!

http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/rebel_...18_16k.mp3


Celtic Rebel Romance is Dead [2 of 2]: why your socially-engineered love-life sucks!

http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/rebel_...25_16k.mp3


love's labor's lost by Heinrich Kley



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



"Monarchy can easily be debunked, but watch the faces, mark well the debunkers. These are the men whose taproot in Eden has been cut: whom no rumour of the polyphony, the dance, can reach - men to whom pebbles laid in a row are more beautiful than an arch. Yet even if they desire mere equality they cannot reach it. Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes or film stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."
---- C.S. Lewis.


Ricefoot's The Real Truth Behind The Illusion Of 9/11

http://vimeo.com/30094696

The Key - Collin Alexander

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds&

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (Full Movie) -

http://krishnatube.com/video/490/A-Funny...o-the-Moon

Deanna Spingola Interview with Bart Sibrel of "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon"

http://k004.kiwi6.com/hotlink/403ze98ykc...120316.mp3

Astronauts Gone Wild -

http://vimeo.com/24508433

September Clues

http://www.septemberclues.info

Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues - Brian S Staveley, Justin Cooke - 04 / 08 / 2012

http://www.therealnewsonline.com/uploads...4-8-12.mp3

Introductory Tour Guide to the September Clues research by Simon Shack - (updated on July 18 2011)

http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=477


Last Days of the Big Lie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7tHB8tD34s


Michael Tsarion Archives

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1...ature=plcp

Terence McKenna Archives

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9...ature=plcp


John Friend's Blog

http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/


Mami - Freedom Monkey Radio Commercial Free Archives

http://grizzom.blogspot.com/

[Infinite]

Just remember that feminism is a phenomenon of the left. In my opinion it's not inherently in women. The government school system and the media brainwash women to loathe and fear their softer feminine nature as weak and blame men for this. They teach them that femininity is not biological but socially constructed by "patriarchal society", i.e. men conspired to create it in order to hold women down. This is total propaganda bullshit. Some of the old laws toward women may have been too paternalistic at one time but they were changed a long time ago, way before the modern feminist movement and also men in America have always worked and strived to provide for their wives and children. If women of the past were truly oppressed it would have been women in the battlefield, not in the kitchen. I'd much rather wash dishes and make food than be shot at.

[Negentropic]

(07-27-2012 08:05 AM)Infinite Wrote:  Just remember that feminism is a phenomenon of the left. In my opinion it's not inherently in women. The government school system and the media brainwash women to loathe and fear their softer feminine nature as weak and blame men for this. They teach them that femininity is not biological but socially constructed by "patriarchal society", i.e. men conspired to create it in order to hold women down. This is total propaganda bullshit. Some of the old laws toward women may have been too paternalistic at one time but they were changed a long time ago, way before the modern feminist movement and also men in America have always worked and strived to provide for their wives and children. If women of the past were truly oppressed it would have been women in the battlefield, not in the kitchen. I'd much rather wash dishes and make food than be shot at.

yeah, it's total BS designed to not make women really strong by synergetically fusing them to the right men in healthy families but to create such neurotic, unnatural extremes that it becomes very hard for a healthy relationship to develop in the complementary way it was meant to develop . Instead you have shallow play-acting by programmed robots determined not to give up any ground in 'the battle of sexes' a sad, little laughable spectacle. The feminine nature is obviously not 'weak' but only when synergized with the masculine and it is for that very reason that oppressive power needs to control it, to deny the synergy that would topple it . It is oppressed with force in one type of backwards society & let loose into total & complete whoredom in another. If a balance is struck, it is never struck with temperance, always with compromise. Things are 'taken away' rather than levels adjusted and fine-tuned. For example: if you gotta sell your looks to get a man, adjust the level down until you're sexy & attractive but not a complete whore and balance that with many other qualities, don't make that your ONLY quality. That will attract the right man then & not a bunch of pimps and exploiters. Smart women realize that but they've been programmed to be few and far between in the U.S.

You can look for a long, long time nowadays and never meet a true lady because women have been programmed that if they act like ladies they are being old-fashioned and maybe even prudish and will therefore lose out in the fierce competition between women for whatever few 'alpha male' characteristics they have all been yet again programmed to consider 'ideal' but which they consider to be their 'free choice.' Of course, all these values are false values, so neurosis results, synergy becomes impossible and society deteroriorates.

Here's an interesting analysis of a certain type of primitive sexuality or feminine power and how it's used by a character in the Powell & Pressburger classic "Black Narcissus":




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmDVkkp6UGY




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-a4PQfKc1c


“Women have the right to work wherever they want, as long as they have the dinner ready when you get home”
John Wayne (major American motion-picture actor who embodied the image of the strong, taciturn cowboy or soldier and who in many ways personified the idealized American values of his era. 1907-1979)

“If you've got them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow.” ~ John Wayne

Star Theory Radio with Kyle Hunt - 08 / 18 / 2012

http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/Star_T...18_16k.mp3

Alex Robinson of http://toolonginthisplace.wordpress.com/
joins Kyle to discuss our conceptions of light and dark, the subversion of feminine energies, the disgusting sexism of religions, the negative and positive aspects of feminism and how the electrical and spiritual nature of existence and the very possibility of creation and creative work itself is rooted in proper synergetic balance of not only light and dark in individual humans but between the masculine & feminine energies both within each individual and between males and females.

http://toolonginthisplace.wordpress.com/...mysteries/

http://toolonginthisplace.wordpress.com/

http://startheory.wordpress.com/

Some of the books mentioned on the show:



Helen Mirren - the Parkinson Interview



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuF_IjPo6rw

What a jack-ass ! Parkinson was sort-of like a Johnny Carson of England and is considered 'a national treasure' today. Let's just say that one of the very positive aspects of feminism was to make idiots like him mind their manners outside the boy's locker room




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHrEmY2RqyU


woman so unwarlike ! !


Les Amoureux, 1888 - Émile Friant (1863-1932). Musée des Beaux-Arts, Nancy, France.






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Egk9ApAWXZY

An Interview with Anna Karina



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75WyOWr-9wE

Vivre Sa Vie Dance Scene Anna Karina HD - Michel Legrand -



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM8LysVo4bs

Marlene Dietrich Blue Angel screentest 1930



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbaRRDgTIkc





Heather's SEXY new TOY! (Thureon Defense 9mm Carbine)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtvyAEk8KbY




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrX7q-a9b2M


When The Cookie Jar Is Empty - Michael Franks - from "Burchfield Nines" (1978)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1uL3xlIU...ure=relmfu

lyrics

When the cookie jar is empty
Baby gets so glum
When the cookie jar is empty
Baby sucks her thumb
Baby breaks her dishes
And she won't eat her peas
Baby never misses
When she throws her spoon at me
Leo is high as I am leaving;
Love is the web that she is weaving
When the cookie jar is empty
Baby don't act right
When the cookie jar is empty
Baby cries all night
Baby gets so sassy,
How can I explain?
Baby moves her chassis
Like a locomotive train
Virgo is high as I'm returning;
Love is the candle she is burning

Michael Franks - In The Eye Of The Storm - from "Sleeping Gypsy" - 1977



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px7rD9Y3kic

You kill me with kindness.
You call me "Your Highness."
But When I get Blue
I can never find you.
The circle keeps turning
The sky is still burning.
I hear from my ex
On the back of my checks.

chorus:
But hold me awhile
And I'll hang up my guns, mama
I know I've been flyin'
Too near the sun.
We'll move to the mountains
and make love to keep warm, mama
like two little birds
In the eye of the storm.

This cloverleaf madness
Just fills me with sadness.
We glide on these streams
Just postponing our dreams.
The love that's inside us
How come it divides us?
It just ain't like Cole Porter
It's just all too short order.

repeat chorus

[Negentropic]

Quote:The anima and animus, in Carl Jung's school of analytical psychology, are the two primary anthropomorphic archetypes of the unconscious mind, as opposed to both the theriomorphic and inferior-function of the shadow archetypes, as well as the abstract symbol sets that formulate the archetype of the Self. The anima and animus are described by Jung as elements of his theory of the collective unconscious, a domain of the unconscious that transcends the personal psyche. In the unconscious of the male, this archetype finds expression as a feminine inner personality: anima; equivalently, in the unconscious of the female it is expressed as a masculine inner personality: animus.

The anima (animus) can be identified as the totality of the unconscious feminine psychological qualities that a male possesses or the masculine ones possessed by the female. It is an archetype of the collective unconscious and not an aggregate of father or mother, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles or teachers, though these aspects of the personal unconscious can influence the person for good or ill.
Because a man's sensitivity must often be repressed, the anima is one of the most significant autonomous complexes of all. It is said to manifest itself by appearing in dreams. It also influences a man's interactions with women and his attitudes toward them and vice versa for females and the animus. Jung said that "the encounter with the shadow is the 'apprentice-piece' in the individual's development...that with the anima is the 'masterpiece'".[1] Jung viewed the anima process as being one of the sources of creative ability.

Levels of anima development

Jung believed anima development has four distinct levels, which he named Eve, Helen, Mary and Sophia. In broad terms, the entire process of anima development in a male is about the male subject opening up to emotionality, and in that way a broader spirituality, by creating a new conscious paradigm that includes intuitive processes, creativity and imagination, and psychic sensitivity towards himself and others where it might not have existed previously.

Eve

The first is Eve, named after the Genesis account of Adam and Eve. It deals with the emergence of a male's object of desire.

Helen

The second is Helen, in allusion to Helen of Troy in Greek mythology. In this phase, women are viewed as capable of worldly success and of being self-reliant, intelligent and insightful, even if not altogether virtuous. This second phase is meant to show a strong schism in external talents (cultivated business and conventional skills) with lacking internal qualities (inability for virtue, lacking faith or imagination).

Mary

The third phase is Mary, named after the Christian theological understanding of the Virgin Mary (Jesus' mother). At this level, females can now seem to possess virtue by the perceiving male (even if in an esoteric and dogmatic way), in as much as certain activities deemed consciously unvirtuous cannot be applied to her.

Sophia

The fourth and final phase of anima development is Sophia, named after the Greek word for wisdom. Complete integration has now occurred, which allows females to be seen and related to as particular individuals who possess both positive and negative qualities. The most important aspect of this final level is that, as the personification "Wisdom" suggests, the anima is now developed enough that no single object can fully and permanently contain the images to which it is related.

Levels of animus development

Jung focused more on the male's anima and wrote less about the female's animus. Jung believed that every woman has an analogous animus within her psyche, this being a set of unconscious masculine attributes and potentials. He viewed the animus as being more complex than the anima, postulating that women have a host of animus images while the male anima consists only of one dominant image.

Jung stated that there are four parallel levels of animus development in a female.[3]

The animus "first appears as a personification of mere physical power - for instance as an athletic champion or muscle man, such as 'the fictional jungle hero Tarzan'".[4]

In the next phase, the animus "possesses initiative and the capacity for planned action...the romantic man - the 19th century British poet Shelley; or the man of action - America's Ernest Hemingway, war hero, hunter, etc."[5]

In the third phase "the animus becomes the word, often appearing as a professor or clergyman...the bearer of the word - Lloyd George, the great political orator".[6]

"Finally, in his fourth manifestation, the animus is the incarnation of meaning. On this highest level he becomes (like the anima) a mediator of...spiritual profundity".[7] Jung noted that "in mythology, this aspect of the animus appears as Hermes, messenger of the gods; in dreams he is a helpful guide." Like Sophia this is the highest level of mediation between the unconscious and conscious mind.

Jung warned that "every personification of the unconscious - the shadow, the anima, the animus, and the Self - has both a light and a dark aspect....the anima and animus have dual aspects: They can bring life-giving development and creativeness to the personality, or they can cause petrification and physical death".[11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anima_and_animus

http://psikoloji.fisek.com.tr/jung/anima.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2b07onDWdk

Masculin, féminin is a 1966 French film directed by Jean-Luc Godard. It stars Jean-Pierre Léaud, Chantal Goya, Marlène Jobert and Michel Debord



masculine and feminine in historic photographs and images:



http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_V-vy8pJtuOY/TK...+1920s.jpg
liza 1920s


Count Leo Tolstoy 1854




slide guitar circa 1926




Rudolf Valentino & Natacha Rambova


Cowboy circa 1890


Stag Pocket Magazine 1958




Eskimo Medicine Man



Stripper Divena 1949 Loomis Dean



Shooting the MGM lion





Hot Rod 1952


Print My Finger 1918



Helmet of Emperor Charles V (1500-58) - 1862 photo by Charles Clifford









machine gun manufacturing

[Negentropic]

Bettie Page dances to the Seeds "Can't Seem to Make You Mine"



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifQK_86Nk-A




















http://ipnagogicosentire.files.wordpress...on1965.jpg
Three young men, Uptown, Chicago - Danny Lyon - 1963

In 1963, Danny Lyon spent time in a poor white area of Chicago called Uptown. Nicknamed ‘hillbilly heaven’, it was a very tough and deprived neighborhood. With a borrowed Rolleiflex camera, he followed the inhabitants of Clifton Street, where he befriended the families who lived there, documenting intimate moments both inside their homes and on the street. Lyon is widely recognized for his personal and elegant reportage. ‘Three Young Men’ captures three men who had moved to the Uptown area from the deep South, posing against a concrete wall tagged by chalk graffiti. Their tough stance and rebellious manner is tempered by a sense of youthful vulnerability.

Quote:wiki entry

Danny Lyon (born March 16, 1942)[1] is a self-taught American photographer and filmmaker. He was born in 1942 in Brooklyn, New York and is the son of Russian-Jewish mother Rebecca Henkin and German-Jewish father Ernst Fredrick Lyon. Danny was raised in Kew Gardens, Queens and went on to study history at the University of Chicago, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1963.

Tadeusz Rolke, Eustachy i Matylda, 1961



http://media1.corbisimages.com/CorbisIma...568102.jpg
Maurice Chevalier with an unknown actress in Innocents of Paris (1929)





This girl in a glass house is putting finishing touches on the bombardier nose section of a B-17F navy bomber in Long Beach, California, She's one of many capable women workers in the Douglas Aircraft Company plant. Better known as the "Flying Fortress," the B-17F is a later model of the B-17 which distinguished itself in action in the South Pacific, over Germany and elsewhere. It is a long range, high altitude heavy bomber, with a crew of seven to nine men, and with armament sufficient to defend itself on daylight missions. Photo taken in October, 1942. (Alfred Palmer/OWI/LOC)



A bony honeymoon


photograph by Peter Stackpole 1937




Original photo caption: Colored mechanic, motor maintenance section, Ft. Knox, Kentucky. Photographed in June, 1942. (Alfred Palmer/OWI/LOC)



coffee & Kent burlesque 1970s



http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t114/...y/b259.jpg

[CharliePrime]

(10-22-2012 04:06 AM)Negentropic Wrote:  EDIT by yeti: Negentropic's entire post was quoted because CharliePrime has no respect for ConCen forum users

Negratropic you did it!

You broke the record. This is the first time, on any forum on the innerwebs, in 20 years of surfing that I have ever had the pleasure of hitting the Page-Down key SIXTY-TWO times to pass a single user's posts.

Even on 4chan such behavior would be considered rude and disrespectful, but you managed to find that unique corner where it is not. Congratulations mi bru.

[yeti]

(10-22-2012 03:14 PM)CharliePrime Wrote:  Even on 4chan such behavior would be considered rude and disrespectful, but you managed to find that unique corner where it is not.

Negentropic is quite obviously mentally ill. What's your excuse?

[Negentropic]

(10-22-2012 04:21 PM)yeti Wrote:  

(10-22-2012 03:14 PM)Charlie Mansons Primal Poon Wrote:  Even on 4chan such behavior would be considered rude and disrespectful, but you managed to find that unique corner where it is not.

Negentropic is quite obviously mentally ill. What's your excuse?

@Charlie Manson's Primal Poon

Charlie Manson's Primal Poon obviously hasn't been on too many forums lately. There are 3000 page threads with nothing but endless historical photos on it all over the net. Where the hell do you think I got all those photos that made your homo ass 'oh-so-agitated' you had to cut a big wet fart out your mouth ?

Now go back to posting your retarded posts elsewhere, where it gets no views whatsoever and maybe I'll check it out every once in a while and have a chuckle.

Or contribute your own historical photos. The older the better since my goal is to try to re-capture a bit of the past that many have forgotten through conditioning. Only requirement: a male or a female HAS to be part of the photo.

Now, go to it boy ! Or I'm going to send Charlie Manson back out of the slammer to pimp you around the block again.


@Yeti:

What's the matter, does the big boss have any objections to photos only posts ?

If yes, that would be one more reason for the utter boredom on concen ever since you guys started moderating every single post. I should remind you boss, that none other than Dennis 'the Fetch' Fetcho recently complemented me on my advanced state of 'mental illness.'


http://concen.org/forum/thread-41812-page-3.html

[Negentropic]

1940s x-ray glamour



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...-wtPnAOLRs

Adolf Hitler's speech on women



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRlfbUr852o




After seven years in the Navy, J.D. Estes is considered an old sea salt by his mates at the Naval Air Base, Corpus Christi, Texas, in August of 1942. (Howard Hollem/OWI/LOC


color magazine advertisements from Hitler's Germany


http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z72/M...ctor39.jpg
erector set


bored


the dividend walter edwards 1916


a boy wanted circa 1898


levitation





Inside Kathy's Apartment - Danny Lyon 1965


Antanas Sutkus © 1959, Carrera en Vilnus


The M47 Dragon, known as the FGM-77 during development, is an American shoulder-fired, man-portable anti-tank missile system.


wild bunch


gold painted stripper 1950


Spanish conquistador and governor of Veragua (Panama), Vasco Núñez de Balboa, setting his war dogs upon Native American practitioners of homosexuality, c.1513*Engraving (c.1594) by Theodor de Bry



http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z72/M...ntview.jpg


[Tennis player Gottfried Freiherr von Cramm with his wife Elisabeth], ca. 1930 - photo by Martin Munkacsi



Gibson girls tumbler set




http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t114/...b432-1.jpg

[Negentropic]

How to Please Your Man: Sexist Coffee Commercial (ca. 1960s)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_q413J6D5I

Sexist Coffee Ad (ca. 1960s)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRYfouuHPvs

Women know your limits!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w


An important public service announcement brought to you by the comedy legend Harry Enfield and his Chums. From BBC.


Harry Enfield - Women Keep Your Virtue



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ0jRuASVEQ


The Ross Sisters - Solid Potato Salad (DVD Quality) Full Video



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1J3NLNWAPU


Serial Killer Rodney James Alcala wins on the Dating Game



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uf95INZmWI

[Negentropic]

Io + gatto, 1932* by Wanda Wulz


Philipp Igumnov

Your Grandfather's Girls:

http://www.pawelwojcik.com/grandfathersgirls/



wisconsin death trip



http://www.beatbooks.com/beatbooks/image.../30942.jpg

http://www.beatbooks.com/shop/beatbooks/30942.html

Quote:Disney 1946 The Story of Menstruation



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_l9qhlHFXuM


The Story of Menstruation is a 1946 10-minute animated film produced by Walt Disney Productions in 1946.
It was commissioned by the International Cello-Cotton Company (now Kimberly-Clark) and was shown to approximately 105 million American students in health education classes.

It was one of the first commercially sponsored films to be distributed to high schools. It was distributed with a booklet for teachers and students called Very Personally Yours that featured advertising of the Kotex brand of products, and discouraged the use of tampons, where the market was dominated by the Tampax brand of rivals Procter & Gamble.

The Story of Menstruation is believed to be the first film to use the word vagina in its screenplay. Neither sexuality nor reproduction is mentioned in the film, and an emphasis on sanitation makes it, as Disney historian Jim Korkis has suggested: "a hygienic crisis rather than a maturation event."