G4S Olympic Security Fail: Problem, Reaction, Solution!

[crystal]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18765062

Council tenants will go to the High Court later over proposals to place surface-to-air missiles on the roof of their tower block during the Olympics.

Residents of Fred Wigg Tower in Leytonstone, east London, will apply for permission for a judicial review.

The tenants say they were not consulted fairly and properly over the plans.

The Ministry of Defence plans to deploy either Rapier or high-velocity missiles at six sites as part of security measures for the London Games.

The residents also want an injunction preventing the siting of the missiles until their legal challenge is heard.

Martin Howe, senior partner with solicitors Howe and Co, said residents of the block's 117 flats were "very afraid" of the proposals.

At the High Court in London, the defence secretary is expected to be accused by the local residents' association of breaching Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

These protect an individual's right to private life and peaceful enjoyment

Lawyers will also argue that an equality impact assessment should be conducted into the needs of disabled residents.

Mr Howe said: "It is incredible that the MoD think it acceptable to present women, children and men living in a block of flats in a densely populated residential area of east London with the fait accompli of having a live, high-explosive missile salvo above their heads whilst they go about their daily chores and whilst they sleep at night.

"Security of the Olympics is, of course, extremely important but could the MoD not find any other way of protecting the Olympic village than by putting the lives of hundreds of innocent council tenants at risk by turning their homes into a military battlefield position?

[yeti]

According to this article the private security firm G4S has failed to provide adequate numbers of guards for Olympic Games security, so now the police and military have to be deployed.

Is it possible that they planned for G4S to fail the whole time (they upped the requirement from 2,000 to 10,000 guards in January), thus justifying deploying an insane amount of filth and fury (cops and soldiers) to the Olympics?

Curiouser & curiouser I say ...

[yeti]

I'm surprised nobody has anything to say about this.

WTF people?? The UK government is deploying thousands of soldiers and police all over London and you have nothing to say? WTF????

Has ConCen turned into a site of sheep?

[crystal]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-18834877

Almost 1,000 full and part-time servicemen and woman based in Northern Ireland will be working as security at the Olympic games in London.

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/9818929..._security/

[yeti]

Since none of you seem to understand the significance of the situation, it looks like I'll have to spell it out for you:

The UK government has deployed the military on the streets of its own nation. This is Martial Law without formal declaration.

From this point forward you will see the the military used as "security" in more and more situations. This is beyond even a police state - this is a military coup by stealth. As demonstrated by the utter lack of response on this of all sites, you don't seem to care. Sheep indeed! You deserve the country you'll get then!

[FastTadpole]

This sets a template precedence to loophole in military deployment, not just in the UK but via the vague multi-national "disaster" agreements.

If you care enough about this, let your fellows know.

[crystal]

As I hadnt seen anything posted up here before. i posted two articles on this sneaky creeping of martial law. Apparantly military presence was already planned, but the numbers have increased.
http://concen.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=46330
Some say it is simply a ceremony. a psychological attack is happening even if faked alien invasion or nuke attack does not happen.

[FastTadpole]

* Merged *

Thanks Crystal

[Swordfish]

For those of you not in the UK - it is quite common practice to employ the military within the UK. Every time the dustbinmen (refuse collectors) go on strike, every time there is a flood, every time there is other destructive weather, major events etc etc

Nothing new - the significant difference with this and martial law is that afterwards they all go back to their barracks and carry on drinking, watching porn and being all macho with each other....

[R.R]

G4S have slowly been taking over many security firms across the UK. They have been advertising for recruitment for the Olympics all year (and Wimbledon, which they also provided security for), offering to pay for S.I.A licences and courses (which usually cost over £400 in total) in the process in order to get even those with no experience in the job. These licences last 3 years. They were offering over 40 hours of work per week, in some cases the opportunity to work everyday (12 hours per day) for around a month. It would have entailed some relocation for people but I'm surprised with the unemployment figures in England that they weren't able to fulfill their requirements especially when you see the many morons who actually work in security.

Aside from fake alien invasions, it might be worth keeping an eye on potential resurfacing of last years rioting and wouldn't it be so convenient if the army were already in the streets? Especially as it was mentioned in the aftermath of last years riots.

[yeti]

(07-17-2012 06:03 PM)Swordfish Wrote:  For those of you not in the UK - it is quite common practice to employ the military within the UK. Every time the dustbinmen (refuse collectors) go on strike, every time there is a flood, every time there is other destructive weather, major events etc etc

I was aware they are deployed for humanitarian assistance during natural disasters, as they are in Canada. Guard and security duties for public areas are a much different role. Are you saying the military has been doing these jobs in the UK for years?

In Canada they are not legally allowed to do these jobs unless there is a declaration of martial law.

[IanPotter]

According to various MSM sources, the TSA is now being brought in to help deal with 'inbound US flights'. Also, there are many rumours currently circulating about foreign troops (esp. German) being seconded for the games. "An insider" has also suggested that Woolwich Barracks is being used to 'process' the new arrivals, although same insider seems to have quoted a figure of 100,000 or so, which seems ridiculous to me.

Right now I think nothing much will happen, aside one or two staged events where 'corporate security' uncovers a bearded man with what will be described as "bomb-making equipment". Then, while the police force continues to come under increasing media attack for being shite (ie under-funded, under-respected and over-worked), Joe Public will be more receptive to private policing, private courts and private prisons on account of the 'wonderful' job G4S did saving us from the bogeyman.

Just yesterday I looked into a company that runs private (but heavily state-sponsored) psychiatric care in the UK, for criminals etc. Lo and behold, I didn't look for very long before I found certain individuals had tangible links with a large pharmaceutical company - in much the same way that big-pharma Pfizer owns big-agra Monsanto in order to 'treat' the disorders they initiate.

Problem, reaction, solution indeed. If only we could make use of that too...

[Swordfish]

Quote:I was aware they are deployed for humanitarian assistance during natural disasters, as they are in Canada. Guard and security duties for public areas are a much different role. Are you saying the military has been doing these jobs in the UK for years?

Yes thats exactly what I am saying.
If you look at this link Mission of the armed forces you will see that it is one of its roles quote:
"THE MISSION OF THE ARMED FORCES

A recent MoD mission statement for the armed forces reads as follows:

"Defence policy requires the provision of forces with a high degree of military effectiveness, at sufficient readiness and with a clear sense of purpose, for conflict prevention, crisis management and combat operations. Their demonstrable capability, conventional and nuclear, is intended to act as an effective deterrent to a potential aggressor, both in peacetime and during a crisis. They must be able to undertake a range of military tasks to fulfil the missions set out below, matched to changing strategic circumstances."

These missions are not listed in any order of priority:

Peacetime Security: To provide forces needed in peacetime to ensure the protection and security of the Untied Kingdom, to assist as required with the evacuation of British nationals overseas, to afford Military Aid to the Civil Authorities in the United Kingdom, including Military Aid to the Civil Power, Military Aid to Other Government Departments and Military Aid to the Civil Community.

Security of the Overseas Territories: To provide forces to meet any challenges to the external security of a British Overseas Territory (including overseas possession and the Sovereign Base Areas) or to assist the civil authorities in meeting a challenge to internal security.

Defence Diplomacy: To provide forces to meet the varied activities undertaken by the Ministry of Defence to dispel hostility, build and maintain trust, and assist in the development of democratically accountable armed forces (thereby making a significant contribution to conflict prevention and resolution).

Support to Wider British Interests: To provide forces to conduct activities to promote British interests, influence and standing abroad.

Peace Support and Humanitarian Operations: To contribute forces to operations other than war in support of British interests and international order and humanitarian principles, the latter most likely under UN auspices.

Regional Conflict Outside the NATO Area: To contribute forces for a regional conflict (but on an attack on NATO or one of its members) which, if unchecked, could adversely affect European security, or which could pose a serious threat to British interests elsewhere, or to international security. Operations are usually under UN or Organisation for Security Co-operation in Europe auspices.

Regional Conflict Inside the NATO Area: To provide forces needed to respond to a regional crisis or conflict involving a NATO ally who calls for assistance under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.

Strategic Attack on NATO: To provide, within the expected warning and readiness preparation times, the forces required to counter a strategic attack against NATO.

The mission statement is further sub-divided into a number of Military Tasks (MT) which accurately define the way in which the missions are actually accomplished."

I should perhaps clarify that this is usually without weapons and is likely to be on this basis for the olympics too (as the other security staff are similarly unarmed).
When our fire services went on strike the military was brought in on the basis that they were pairs of hands who could be used to cover any non emergency operations.
They were no doubt asked to leave their ski masks, night vision goggles and abseiling gear at home - seriously, these are not SAS its just the squaddies who would normally be armed with a sweeeping brush and an ill fitting uniform at Aldershot.

[yeti]

(07-18-2012 07:18 PM)Swordfish Wrote:  I should perhaps clarify that this is usually without weapons and is likely to be on this basis for the olympics too (as the other security staff are similarly unarmed).

I assumed they would be armed, but if they are not I find it silly that they would even be there.

In Canada our armed forces are very small but all are highly trained. They would never be used as unarmed security grunts.

[crystal]

the gs4 crew have got a great repetoire of past events including: 911, 7/7, Madrid and Tokyo. However i have some hope that enough protest has been sent around and the planners plot has been foiled!


Taken from another forum:

'I think something was planned to happen at the Olympics that was terrorist related and to be orchestrated by G4s security.

but once the idea had got out to the mainstream through alternative media sites that a false flag terror attack/alien invasion was going to occur it became all to obvious and the elite decided to back down. That is why G4s who are now supposedly unable to fill applications when they where in fact in reality standing down and pulling out it's false flag team from the Olympics.

i feel that the elite have decided on a plan b with false flags attacks going to happen in different countries instead of the intended Olympic venue and maybe even alien false flags in other countries in the next few weeks.

just my opinion'

'Very plausible. The agreed consensus growing in the mainstream media of a chaotic and ridiculous debacle, the apathy and cynicism of a large proportion of the British population, the unsold tickets, the vast numbers now waiting to analyse and deconstruct even the smallest problem as a False Flag, even the perpetual pissing rain which Boris Johnson says Piers Corbyn predicts will continually punctuate the Olympic period, have put a dampener on these vainglorious events.
Perhaps we'll have to content ourselves with the occultist and subliminal aspects and the vibrational effects of that big bloody bell.

It's hard to see how they would want all that extreme martial law apparatus in place going to waste though. So maybe not. Given their usual dependence on templates, they would need to have been more than usually imaginative to produce a credible effect

Or maybe they just take the communication systems down '