[split] Should ConCen pay $220 unlimited or $150 1TB?
06-05-2012, 11:29 PM
RE: [split] Should ConCen pay $220 unlimited or $150 1TB?
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: No he just wanted you to think he was going to shut the place down because of your "interaction" which didnt end well.
When someone libels me publicly on a site I run, it never ends well.
He said he did it to me and to the members of cybersage.net. IMO and others, that's bad enough. It would be irresponsible at that point for me to assume he didn't do it.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: Hes an IT specialist - how difficult is it to pretend to have sent something without actually doing it? Even I can do that.
It's possible that he forged the email headers, but I have to accept the possibility that he didn't. Since you're claiming that he didn't send them, what evidence do you base that on?
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: Has anyone even been in touch about this? No! If they had the account would be suspended which Im guessing it hasnt as you havent announced it.
You seem so sure that I would be contacted by either PayPal or 3Z just because someone complained. This is a false assumption, something you seem to do constantly.
FYI someone else requested 3Z to have a site I was hosting removed because he claimed a copyright violation (which was true - he was the author of the web pages). I never heard a word from 3Z about it. They sent him an email response back stating that without a court order they will do nothing. The only reason I got a copy of the email was because he CC'd me by accident. BTW I complied with the request and had the owners of the domain rebuild the site themselves.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: And if you voted against the unmetered then why are you having a poll in the first place?
What a stupid question. I can't believe I'm wasting my time on your trolling.
I posted the poll because I want to know the members' opinions on whether or not to commit to spending more per month.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: Wasnt that your idea to hold it as you DIDNT want to stop seeding from the server
I didn't want to have to pay extra to seed from the server, and up until niggling little shits like you and Epinnoia reminded me how much I hate donating my time to provide info for the members only to have it thrown back in my face, I was willing to continue finding and launching torrents from the server.
No more. I'm done, unless there is no metering simply because it's not worth my time micromanaging torrents, especially when ordered to by ungrateful whining little fucks with nothing better to do than shit on people who are donating their time for free.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: (NOTE: this is based on a number of direct quotes from you - see post 20 on this thread).
I saw your quotes but they are out of context and irrelevant because I voted against the increase. You're flogging a dead horse. Your assumption has been proven to be incorrect again but you stubbornly refuse to admit it, a trait you share with your good buddy Epinnoia.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: And as its your site, its your decision (your words not mine) as to what happens on the site.
I understand why someone like you twists my words around to use as an insult because that's a troll's M.O.
The simple fact is that whether a decision is made by me or not, ultimately I am the one who has to implement it. Trolls like you love to twist that around to try and claim that I'm a dictator.
My arch enemy? You mean he's not your arch enemy? He tried to blackmail me into unbanning him by threatening to shut the place down. This makes him the most notorious arch enemy this site has ever had!
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: in which you resisted this very suggestion, or is it that you have just changed your mind because it makes sense but wont admit to it.
Again with the trolling insult assumptions! The answer is neither.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: If you want the metered plan then whats the problem - just do it - why do you need a (non time limited) poll?
Because I want to know what the members want.
I'm glad the fact that the poll doesn't have a time limit bothers you. I want you to be as bothered as I am by you and your trolling. I'm warning you though, if you keep it up my patience will run out.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: I dont need to twist reality, I can make my case just copying and pasting quotes on the forum
Why am I not surprised that you would not admit your problem?
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: And I didnt say the poll was a sham, i said quote [quote]Cant see how this poll is going to solve the problem
I didn't say you said it was a sham, I said you claimed it was a sham. I used a perfectly apt word to describe your words, called a synonym.
It is obvious to anyone with a basic grasp of English that you think this poll is a sham. Therefore I stand by my words. Go ahead and nitpick a little more as another excuse to whine, troll.
You. Constantly. You are a troll who's trying to bust my balls for whatever reason, certainly not for the good of this site.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: I see you are pointing the "troll" finger at me now because I am making posts
You just claimed I'm calling you a troll because you post! What an absurd statement! Does your reality distortion field allow you to see how stupid that makes you look?
You are a troll because you make shit up and fling it at people. Throughout this entire exchange you have not made a single positive statement. It's been whining and lying and assumptions designed purely to insult.
(06-05-2012 08:24 AM)Swordfish Wrote: is this why only about 20 or so members ever make a post on the forum I wonder.
Wow. I guess your reality distortion field prevents you from seeing the stats that completely contradict you, because that would deny you another insult.
BTW, you claim you made a financial contribution in the past, yet you refuse to say how much or under what name because it's none of our business. I find this very strange. If what you say is true, then you would be the first person in ConCen history I'm aware of who refuses to prove they donated. Since you have demonstrated repeatedly that you are of dubious character, and are unwilling to provide evidence that you actually have donated, I'm going to assume that you haven't. I welcome any evidence which may prove my assumption incorrect.
At this point I will remind the members that you have a shit ratio (you leech off others' bandwidth), you have never uploaded a torrent, and there is no evidence that you ever donated. Therefore you really should ditch your sense of entitlement and claim that you speak for members who actually do contribute to this site.
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)