|
[split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
|
|
05-23-2012, 12:12 AM
Post: #61
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
every donator gets credited. It should be possible to do the math if it is the alleged cash cow.
“The truth, of course, is that a billion falsehoods told a billion times by a billion people are still false.” --Travis Walton http://truthfrequencyradio.com/chat/ |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 12:13 AM
Post: #62
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
what a toad. Threatening to use the institutions we are pretty much universally united against to try to ¨win¨ a squabble. Might want to change the user name in his previous posts to ¨Lamo¨ Fucking traitor. Probably would rat out his friends to get his sentence reduced. Tool.
|
|||
|
05-23-2012, 12:37 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-23-2012 12:47 AM by shuffle.)
Post: #63
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
(05-22-2012 09:10 AM)geogaddi00 Wrote: Is it harder nowadays with this forum - as of 2010/2011 - or was the old way with the comments directly on the tracker easier and more efficient? Good point Geo - do you think this may have allowed such a situation to take place? ie: the move to no-comments tracker?? Altho how come this guy seems to know loads about the running of the forum and tracker but his handle and name don't really ring a bell. I know I don't post of the main site much - but i do read posts so I get a rough idea who's regularly doing what. What was his post count b4 he was banned? NB: Grassing to pay pal is worse than grassing your mate in to the cops. It's like giving info to the Trilateral Commission members in my book: ie: way above the Bilderberg lot. - "We are just glorified monkeys in suits.... show me where it's written we should be able to model the cosmos?!" -Terence McKenna, 21st Century Bard R.I.P-ranks Terence. I miss your take on life. =-= |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 12:43 AM
Post: #64
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
lol its why I never upset the Yeti
|
|||
|
05-23-2012, 12:45 AM
Post: #65
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
Epinnoia Wrote:
Quote:"I have given you more chances than you gave me. But you at least seem to recognize that you're not operating from any position of power now, given your latest message in that thread. You know PayPal will do it, or will likely do it, if I send it out to them. And your colo facility has a policy that expressly forbids the sharing of copyright material without permission of copyright holders." Fuck off you low down grass. Get a life and contribute instead. "We are just glorified monkeys in suits.... show me where it's written we should be able to model the cosmos?!" -Terence McKenna, 21st Century Bard R.I.P-ranks Terence. I miss your take on life. =-= |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 12:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-23-2012 01:02 AM by Frank2.)
Post: #66
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
hope this thread is safely moved over to smacktalk after the feathers stop flying. doesn't really matter though, does it?
Withdraw your threat, Epinnoia. You are well out of order. (05-23-2012 12:45 AM)shuffle Wrote: Epinnoia Wrote: You have to get into the mindset - it isn't grassing, it's a complex utilitarian action - by destroying the site, they help the community. Eppinoia is a crusading nemesis, raging against corruption be believes he has uncovered and the attacking of the entire community is not too great a price to pay in the cause. Like M.Albright and the Iraqi dead quote. It's complex utilitarianism. “The truth, of course, is that a billion falsehoods told a billion times by a billion people are still false.” --Travis Walton http://truthfrequencyradio.com/chat/ |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 04:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-23-2012 04:19 AM by Ibgbg.)
Post: #67
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
I think a lot of the discussion here should take place in a separate thread. This one should be about Epinnoia, even though I don't see why, as I wrote before, we continue to "feed the troll". And the discussion about Yeti somewhere else.
No matter how and why we got into this situation is not the most important thing right now. But rather; how do we solve the problem? IMO even a site like this need to be "policed" by someone (I'm sure some other people think complete anarchy would be better), right now it's Yeti. If he/she is the right man/woman (?) for the job is something to be dealt with later. |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 07:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-23-2012 07:37 AM by Anarchist.)
Post: #68
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
(05-23-2012 04:14 AM)Ibgbg Wrote: I think a lot of the discussion here should take place in a separate thread. This one should be about Epinnoia, even though I don't see why, as I wrote before, we continue to "feed the troll". And the discussion about Yeti somewhere else. Erm, I might claim anarchy would be better. Maybe... Yeti: Oh, and since Epinnoia cannot attack you here, I guess he is taking to other forums. I do not know how many, but apparently he is active on Cybersage. He posted links to some screen shots, I guess he thinks they indict you? Here are some of the links he posted, still obsessing on you going over the 1tb, and some emails he sent to you. http://prntscr.com/9kj8m http://prntscr.com/9kjag http://prntscr.com/9kfi8 http://prntscr.com/9ko5s I guess emails he sent you are proof against you? They can be found here for all to see. http://www.cybersage.net/shoutbox.php?history=1&page=2 http://www.cybersage.net/shoutbox.php?history=1&page=1 On a side note, I am still wondering... What was so bad with the idea he proposed? To me, it would seem that if there was a way to reduce costs, wouldn't that be desirable? Or would the idea just not work? Sorry, I do not know anything about technology. Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - Henry L. Mencken I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant. - Henry L. Mencken |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 07:22 AM
Post: #69
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
(05-23-2012 07:04 AM)Anarchist Wrote:(05-23-2012 04:14 AM)Ibgbg Wrote: I think a lot of the discussion here should take place in a separate thread. This one should be about Epinnoia, even though I don't see why, as I wrote before, we continue to "feed the troll". And the discussion about Yeti somewhere else. Did you forget to insert a quote or something I got a bit scared when I read the first few lines
|
|||
|
05-23-2012, 07:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-23-2012 07:37 AM by Anarchist.)
Post: #70
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
No idea how I did what I just did, I tried to edit the other post and posted a new one... Well...
The rest was meant for Yeti, although now I see what I did. Perhaps it needs fixing, maybe I can do it right this time. Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - Henry L. Mencken I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant. - Henry L. Mencken |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 07:41 AM
Post: #71
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges | |||
|
05-23-2012, 11:42 AM
Post: #72
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
(05-23-2012 07:04 AM)Anarchist Wrote: What was so bad with the idea he proposed? To me, it would seem that if there was a way to reduce costs, wouldn't that be desirable? Or would the idea just not work? Sorry, I do not know anything about technology. If you're referring to his intermittent seeding algorithm, then as I explained to him several times, it's not relevant to initial seeding, only long term seeding, which the server doesn't do.
|
|||
|
05-23-2012, 12:10 PM
Post: #73
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
(05-22-2012 03:12 PM)icosaface Wrote: The site has always been hosted from Canada and we have as much "free speech" here as the united States of America has. This thread about epinnoia is basically about the rules of this forum. We should have clear rules about banning people that are not based upon personal likes or dislikes but objectively controlled parameters. This way free speech is served the most, especially on a conspiracy forum like this. Trolling or other of these 'minor' disagreements should not be reasons for banning. Let's behave like grown ups in the real world people, that have their actions and boundaries defined by the law, and not by petty differences. If concen has 8 admins a thread should be made with a bann list per each admin AND the reasons for banning. This way patterns can be established and also controllability if the admins abide by objectively controllable bann rules. |
|||
|
05-23-2012, 12:19 PM
Post: #74
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
(05-23-2012 12:10 PM)Tim77 Wrote: Trolling or other of these 'minor' disagreements should not be reasons for banning. Most moderated sites just delete the offender completely. Would you prefer that?
|
|||
|
05-23-2012, 01:45 PM
Post: #75
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [split] Server Bandwidth Overage Charges
(05-23-2012 12:19 PM)yeti Wrote:(05-23-2012 12:10 PM)Tim77 Wrote: Trolling or other of these 'minor' disagreements should not be reasons for banning. Concen is a conspiracy site and should be of a higher standard then other so called forums. For we fight for freedom and justice and indict the current powers for their handling of affairs. Lets raise the bar so that others may follow. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)








I got a bit scared when I read the first few lines
