Jesse Ventura Rips Alex Jones A New One For Gatekeeping Judy Wood & DEW - IMG INT

[Negentropic]

WARNING

This is an IMAGE & MEDIA INTENSIVE thread, not intended for the meek or those in love with their own dubious notions of 'sanity.' If you do not want to wait a few minutes for the page to load or you have an older junk computer, please do not visit this thread.


Jesse Ventura cuts Alex Jones a new hole the size of Austin, Texas for gatekeeping Judy Wood & DEW (Direct Energy Weapons) theory.

Ventura recites just a few simple facts based on Judy Wood's research AJ's been ignoring on purpose for years & absolutely refuses to back down. AJ stumbles over his words and admits that he gatekept Judy Wood's research on purpose so as not to alienate people out of the 9/11-was-an-inside-job half-truth movement.


http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/91..._AJ1c3.mp3



For updated massive Judy Wood / DEW / No-Planer Audio Archives, bookmark this page:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/91...order=desc

[Infinite]

Is Judy Wood's research that sound though? I'm open to the no plane theories based on what I've seen in September Clues but the directed energy weapons theory seems less credible to me based on what I've seen of it from her and others. I don't see why it's always mixed in with tv fakery/no planes. I think it might have been no planes/alternative planes or missles that hit the towers and explosives that brought them down.

[Easy Skanking]

(07-07-2011 09:43 AM)Infinite Wrote:  Is Judy Wood's research that sound though? I'm open to the no plane theories based on what I've seen in September Clues but the directed energy weapons theory seems less credible to me based on what I've seen of it from her and others. I don't see why it's always mixed in with tv fakery/no planes. I think it might have been no planes/alternative planes or missles that hit the towers and explosives that brought them down.

Here's what I had to say about her research:
http://concen.org/forum/showthread.php?t...#pid219449

[rsol]

alex cant think on his feet. anyone will tell you paper is a subject to different conditions than anything else in that building. the idea of paper being displaced unharmed riding along with the escaping air doesn't vex me... im a little surprised at ventura. single sheets of paper can easily right the wind... cement blocks and steel tend to be less subject to this. basic physics.

[Infinite]

(07-07-2011 11:14 AM)Easy Skanking Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 09:43 AM)Infinite Wrote:  Is Judy Wood's research that sound though? I'm open to the no plane theories based on what I've seen in September Clues but the directed energy weapons theory seems less credible to me based on what I've seen of it from her and others. I don't see why it's always mixed in with tv fakery/no planes. I think it might have been no planes/alternative planes or missles that hit the towers and explosives that brought them down.

Here's what I had to say about her research:
http://concen.org/forum/showthread.php?t...#pid219449

I've often hear the argument that it has to have been d.e.w. used on 9/11 because the buildings were 'pulverized into dust', but when watching other regular demolitions the buildings appear to be similarly pulverized into dust and no directed energy was used on them.

[Negentropic]

(07-08-2011 08:22 AM)Infinite Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 11:14 AM)Easy Skanking Wrote:  

(07-07-2011 09:43 AM)Infinite Wrote:  Is Judy Wood's research that sound though? I'm open to the no plane theories based on what I've seen in September Clues but the directed energy weapons theory seems less credible to me based on what I've seen of it from her and others. I don't see why it's always mixed in with tv fakery/no planes. I think it might have been no planes/alternative planes or missles that hit the towers and explosives that brought them down.

Here's what I had to say about her research:
http://concen.org/forum/showthread.php?t...#pid219449

I've often hear the argument that it has to have been d.e.w. used on 9/11 because the buildings were 'pulverized into dust', but when watching other regular demolitions the buildings appear to be similarly pulverized into dust and no directed energy was used on them.

True. Standard demolitions do raise a lot of dust but not that much dust & not dust with nano-particles finer than a red blood cell. It's not the dust by itself that points towards high-tech weapons but the fact that there was barely any seismic footprint recorded for any of the buildings, including WTC 7, and not much rubble left at ground zero ALREADY before noon on 9/11:


Figure 10. WTC6, an 8-story building, towers over the "rubble pile" remaining from WTC1 and 2. We know this photo was taken before noon on 9/11/01. WTC7 can be seen in the distance. The Verizon Building is at a distance on the left

And as far as plane parts go, WHAT PLANE PARTS? Aside from the planted engine from the wrong plane on Murray Street & the planted wheel-unit with INFLATED, NON-MELTED tires, there was nothing anywhere. There are supposed to be 100s of thousands of parts scattered everywhere PER PLANE. How can they all melt in a fireball? And if melted, couldn't the melted parts still be found? None of the black boxes were even found, much less plane parts. No computers, no toilets, no phones, only one filing cabinet. To this day there are only 249 victims with a confirmed death certificate on file and not one of those, not a single one with a valid “last address of record” on file, and yet they claim 2970 people died and won't let anyhone interview the so-called victim's families! What the fuck? What gives? Since when does a standard demolition disappear all toilets, filing cabinets, phones and computers? The only possible answer would be they emptied those gigantic buildings of all toilets and computers beforehand which would be a completely ridiculous claim.

That in itself, plus the fact that standard demolitions and that massive weight coming down would have destroyed the 2
'bathtubs' the towers were built in (except for WTC 7) and flooded Manhattan, should be enough to prove the official alternative theory wrong.

[p4r4]

.



FF to 3:20 and check out the steel beams turn to steel dust.










One of the reasons for AJ to try and hide this evidence and analysis, would be the potential declassification of the technology/weapons in future...

[Negentropic]

The latest straight-up bitch-slap in AJ's chubby shilling face :


http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/91...202012.mp3

Ventura again uncompromisingly defends Judy Wood & the Seismic Data, not just on WTC 1 & 2 but also on WTC 7








Alex Jones has at least twenty-three(23) different radio and website sponsors that are Jewish owned and operated.

http://web.archive.org/web/2011072607111...ish-money/

Who Controls Television ?

http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-television/

Who Controls Big Media ?

http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-big-media/

Who Controls the News ?

http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls...ws-part-1/


Who Controls the Council on Foreign Relations ?

http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls...ns-part-1/


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Ricefoot's The Real Truth Behind The Illusion Of 9/11

http://vimeo.com/30094696

The Key - Collin Alexander

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uT1q0j5Pzr0

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (Full Movie) -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBAuezmFNIk

Deanna Spingola Interview with Bart Sibrel of "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon"

http://k004.kiwi6.com/hotlink/403ze98ykc...120316.mp3

Astronauts Gone Wild -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tWqh7OuLWE

Last Days of the Big Lie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7tHB8tD34s

September Clues

http://www.septemberclues.info

Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues - Brian S Staveley, Justin Cooke - 04 / 08 / 2012

http://www.therealnewsonline.com/uploads...4-8-12.mp3


Michael Tsarion Archives

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1...ature=plcp

Terence McKenna Archives

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9...ature=plcp


John Friend's Blog

http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/

Mami - Freedom Monkey Radio Commercial Free Archives

http://grizzom.blogspot.com/

[capnchronic]

Seems like space beams (and no planes?) will be getting attention on the next season of Conspiracy Theory.

Quote:
Truth Seeker
Tyrel Ventura prepares to talk to Dr. Judy Wood.

http://www.trutv.com/shows/conspiracy_th...urPhoto=11

There's also what seems to be a "Space beam", referred to as a "Deathray" in this video.
http://www.trutv.com/video/conspiracy-th...ealed.html

[Negentropic]

@capnchronic

I do not support Judy Wood's theory anymore, haven't for at least a year now.

It's disinfo against the really meticulous and conclusive No-Planer / Media Fakery research done at September Clues Forums by Simon Shack and company.

The problem with Judy Wood's theory is basically that ALL images from 9-11, all photos & all videos are completely suspect & most are already proven fakes. Simon Shack at Clues Forum is banning her 'evidence,' not because he hasn't seen it but because he's had enough of it already. They already debunked many of the photographs and videos that are the main source of her 'evidence' beyond hurricane Erin, the seismic footprints, the dust being nano-scopic & that other stuff. That other stuff without all the images & the videos Wood relies on doesn't prove much.

I do have her book, bought it the first week it came out, back when I still thought that most of the images aside from the videos of the planes could be trusted and thought, just like Deanna Spingola, that it made a solid case based on those images. Not anymore. Some aspects of Wood's non-photographic evidence might turn out to be valid but not the gist of the DEW theory and certainly not with that bozo fraud Hutchison attached. She even thinks that the videos and photos of the so-called jumpers are real which have been debunked any number of times as fake.

Falling Man

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=501

CGI Collapse Footage

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=802

Faking the Rubble

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=489

Quote:

"It appears that NO PHOTOGRAPHY was allowed at Ground Zero, as of an official order signed by NY Mayor Giuliani. I am inclined to believe that this was actually the case (even though some may accuse me of choosing to believe only pictures that fit our theories...):

So, what sort of justification would such a menacing WARNING SIGN have? What kind of problem would anyone cause to anyone by snapping pictures of the premises of such a historically defining, public event? One official motivation given was that "it was a crime scene". Oh yeah - it sure was !...

PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: If you have had your camera seized by the authorities around Ground Zero, please get in touch!


For years, I 'knew' that only ONE photographer had access to Ground Zero.

I thought it was time to remind everybody about this dude...



JOEL MEYEROWITZ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Meyerowitz

" the only photographer allowed unrestricted access to ground zero immediately following the attack":


-- Simon Shack


http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php...the+rubble



Shack on "Where Did the Towers Go?" by Judy Wood


"I see that Judy Wood has published a new book. However, her research is based on fake pictures. The sole purpose of her existence is, imho, to provide 'a plausible explanation' for the very stupid-looking WTC 'pulverization' animations."

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=869

Quote:STEVEN ROSENBAUM'S $3MILLION ARCHIVE OF 9/11 AMATEUR FOOTAGE

There may be one easy way to find out just how the 9/11 planners impeded any genuine, private footage to be captured or/and to prevent any such footage to leak out to the public: ask Steven Rosenbaum.


This is a brief overview of the guy - and his activities since 9/11:

Mr. Rosenbaum’s pre-9/11 company, BNN TV, employed over 80 people and occupied five floors of a Fifth Avenue building in Manhattan. The proud slogan of his company was “BNN TV Changes the Way Stories Are Told”. His clients included CNN, CBS News, MSNBC, HBO and Court TV. The studios were equipped with state-of-the-art AVID video editing equipment - the sort of which you only find in major Hollywood studios.

As the story goes, in the days following 9/11, Steve put up posters and fliers in NYC and placed an ad in The Village Voice “urgently requesting images that captured the attack, its aftermath and the mood of the city”. That effort seems to have worked out nicely. His 1,700 video clips of 9/11 constitute, he says, “the largest archive of my now dormant television production company, Camera Planet”. His website tells us that 76 people contributed to these “500 hours of videos”, which are owned by Mr. Rosenbaum and his wife, Pamela Yoder (no mention is made whether or not he paid these 76 people for their precious footage).

In other words, Steven Rosenbaum claims to have collected 500 hours of 9/11 amateur footage - from amateur videographers who would have willingly handed over their 9/11 footage to his new Camera Planet company - so that he could set up a big, nice archive of 9/11 amateur footage! Later, as Camera Planet went bankrupt, he allegedly put this 9/11 archive up for sale - for a mere $3 million. Do you think I'm kidding you? Check out this 2005 piece of the New York Observer:

Quote:http://www.cameraplanet.com/divisions/im...server.pdf

(When the company was in dire straits last winter, Mr. Rosenbaum attempted to sell off his vast library of 9/11 footage valued at $3 million. So far, there have been no takers.)

Does anyone here have $3 million to spare? Perhaps we could relieve Mr. Rosenbaum of his dire burden?

I trust everyone on this forum will be familiar with the numerous, horridly low-res video clips of purported 9/11 footage infesting Youtube - carrying the Camera Planet logo. Taken together, and providing you have watched/compared them all, anyone should be able to see that they are nothing but an assembly line of animations created in a digital 3D environment and are, all in all, just a crude series of computerized animations - slightly rotated & retargeted at will. The purpose they serve is, of course, to convey the illusion that many different cameramen shot these videos in reality.

So let's ask Mr. Steven Rosenbaum if he can supply us with a list of the alleged 76 authors of these "amateur videos", shall we?

Simon Shack


http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php...m#p2364110

Anyway, that's just a short recap as to why the images are not to trusted in any way and I'm not allowed to start anymore No-Planes / Media Fakery threads here on concen to discuss any of this stuff further so please go to those links and read on your own if you're interested and then sign up and ask the Clues Forums guys questions.

Also here's the basic tour guide for navigating Clues Forums which you should always go to first:

Introductory Tour Guide to the September Clues research by Simon Shack - (updated on July 18 2011)

http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=477

[capnchronic]

Just want to clarify, I wasn't posting that to in any way attack you or anything along those lines, just wanted to throw that in here since that episode is really a continuation of what was discussed in this thread.

[Frank2]

http://concen.org/forum/thread-34837.htm...ght=scidel

[Negentropic]

(11-15-2012 09:28 AM)capnchronic Wrote:  Just want to clarify, I wasn't posting that to in any way attack you or anything along those lines, just wanted to throw that in here since that episode is really a continuation of what was discussed in this thread.

I didn't take it that way. It's just that when I started this thread I put a lot more credence in Judy Wood's theories than I do now. In my opinion, Shack is the least debunked of all the 9-11 theorists and that's why I'm a member of Clues Forums and read there every day.

Still that doesn't mean Alex Jones was right to just ridicule and ban her and all the other No-Planers like Simon Shack & Ace Baker and Killtown who consider her stuff disinfo, without a fair hearing.

Ventura just ripped David Icke a new one too, discovering and exposing that Icke makes 2 million dollars a year !! I think Icke just turned around and walked out the room when he was confronted with that. Which audio did I hear that on ?

Does someone have that video of Ventura confronting Icke ?

2 million ? Jeff Rense must be jealous with his measly $400,000 a year !

[capnchronic]

http://concen.org/tracker/torrents-details.php?id=31265
That's the show with Icke, although if you look in the comments thread associated with it, there are links to the HDTV rips, as this one is sort of low quality, definitely watchable though.

[R.R]

Negentropic Wrote:Ventura just ripped David Icke a new one too, discovering and exposing that Icke makes 2 million dollars a year !! I think Icke just turned around and walked out the room when he was confronted with that. Which audio did I hear that on ?

Does someone have that video of Ventura confronting Icke ?

I knew that tosser was raking it in. Has anyone got a link to these claims by Ventura or any further info?

What would be funny is if Icke's name comes up in the Savile investigations regarding former BBC employees....