|
Adrian Salbuchi Opens A Can of Mental Whup-Ass on the Corbett Report
|
|
07-25-2011, 08:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2012 02:01 AM by Negentropic.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Adrian Salbuchi Opens A Can of Mental Whup-Ass on the Corbett Report
Quote:I 'lean towards anarchism' too. Not the black masked Chomsky worshiping kind of anarchism, that's just a different form of communism than Marxism, but individualist anarchism. Government is violence, it operates through violence. They force their 'services' and 'protection' on us and coerce us to pay taxes to them or else they'll imprison/kill us just like the mafia does. Dress it up however you want, that's what it is. Look at Waco and Ruby Ridge, that's government. Yup, I agree. I've been a Libertarian ever since I first read Rothbard's "For A New Liberty" back in the early 90s. I still think it's one of the greatest books ever written. There are only 2 ways out of the current predicament and the patient cannot be saved without surgery as Ezra Pound stated way back when: the collectivist self-defense surgical knife of Fascism and National Socialism ( succeeded for 6 years prior to WWII in Germany & 17 years in Italy & yes, both countries, allowed plenty of individualism after they had got rid of the cirminals, but not the rotten, degenerate, anything-goes kind where 'the plague of Marxism would have the culture to spread its germs' as Hitler wrote) or individualistic hardcore, no-compromise non-pussified, non-gate-keeping surgical knife of libertarianism, an improved and fool-proof version of the Andrew Jackson revolution of the 19th century (succeeded for about 25 years prior to Lincoln, the civil war and the income tax) . Rothbard's system is that system and it's logically fool-proof if advocated without compromise. Unfortunately there are lots of people who will never accept any system put forward by Jewish economists like Von Mises and Rothbard no matter how logical and intelligent they are and no matter if they're basically a modern improvement and rape-proofing of Adam Smith and the Classical Liberals of the 19th century. Ron Paul and Rand Paul seem to be obvious pussified controlled opposition, not even having the balls to come out with a simple '9/11 was an inside job' and Ron writing that book with the PNAC member, etc. How can any intelligent person not even see through the thousands of holes in the official 9-11 story? Ron sees and Ron knows but Ron is Senor-No-Balls. The problem isn't Libertarianism or even Jeffersonian 19th century classical liberalism, the problem is the leaders being these spineless limited-hangout pussies put out there for controlled opposition. Jesse Ventura, just by being a 9-11 truther, would be a much better Libertarian candidate than Ron Paul except that Ventura seems to also believe in global warming and other nonsense. Alex 'Arabs-Own-Hollywood-but-I-didn't-say-that-Charlie-I've-Seen-Your-Hernia' Jones would 100% gate-keep the main culprits (elite Zionist Jews and all those who aid and support them in any way) despite all evidence so I don't know about that fool. Jeff Rense is a recluse, so maybe Texe Marrs can be his vice president since he's a man of Christ and can deflect accusations of anti-semitism by bringing out Jesus 'the Nazz' and 'the Synagogue of Satan' every other sentence. ![]() ![]() Quote:Nazz was a psychedelic and garage rock band from the 1960s. The band was formed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1967 by Todd Rundgren (lead guitar) and Carson Van Osten (bass guitar). Thom Mooney (drums, formerly of the Munchkins), and Robert "Stewkey" Antoni (vocals, keyboards) joined before their first concert, opening for the Doors in 1967. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



![[Image: jesus.jpg]](http://www.slohann.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/jesus.jpg)
![[Image: album-nazz-nazz.jpg]](http://images.uulyrics.com/cover/t/the-nazz/album-nazz-nazz.jpg)

