MUST SEE ! AMAZING MIRACLES OF THE QUR'AN

[ashleysmithh]

Billions of muslims & non muslims all over the world claim that this book is "THE MIRACLE OF MIRACLES"

Why? I give you one example: So many scientifict discovery were discover in the 20 and 21st centery and were already mention in the quran 1400 years ago like the big bang,the expansion of the universe or the fact that life came from water to name a few. And the verse is not in contradiction with modern science discovery ! Let me tell you that the conclusion of these scientist was that the book was written by god.How can a man,in the middle of the desert,1400 years ago,who doesn't know how to read & writte can produce a book which contain hundreds of scientificts facts which are only able to be confirm in the 20 & 21 centery?

You may ask,why did u never heard about that?well remember,it's the new world order which one goal of this "new secular order"is to erase the world from religious belief and promote all the fake religion ( Polytheist religion )

An artist called G-one produce a song called "The Miracle Of Miracles" exposing 7 miracles among hundreds of the glorious qur'an.The song contain sample from scientificts,independants researcher and great thinkers and mind.

If you want to hear the song :

http://www.myspace.com/worldwakeupmusic

I let you judge !

peace

[mastermg]

Yeah Ive been trying to explain that religion and science work together towards the same direction, although parallel and never touching. However, the Quran is not a book of science. Thanks for the song though.

[Jobujack]

True the Quran is not a book of science,though the predictions within are interesting, also the fact that it has not been as man manipulated as the other religions have is impressive.

Good link thanks Ash

JJ:)

[mastermg]

Quote:True the Quran is not a book of science,though the predictions within are interesting, also the fact that it has not been as man manipulated as the other religions have is impressive.

Good link thanks Ash

JJ:)

Yep check this site out JJ and anyone else interested.
http://thisistruth.org/

This too if you want http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47N37nC01WI...feature=related

[nietzscheansuperman]

Lol, thanks for the laughs.

[mastermg]

I expected something to come from NSM lol you can just chill and leave the post to Be?

[psilocybin]

Quote:Lol, thanks for the laughs.

agreed.

The big bang idea wasn't crafted in the qur'an either. It had been circulating via the vedas.

[drew hempel]

I had an amazing O at a D session while these miracles were described to me by a young Muslim female. The cervix is what I remember best.

[mastermg]

Quote:I had an amazing O at a D session while these miracles were described to me by a young Muslim female. The cervix is what I remember best.

Pervert :P

[triplesix]

Warning: Tangential Rant

The Big Bang pisses me off because it first of all doesn't answer any question at all, because what came before the big bang? And secondly, people's conclusions regarding it are dogmatic, whether religious in the sense of believing the big bang to be "the divine spark" or 'scientific' in believing nothing pertaining to our understanding of physical universe existed before it.

I mean, if the Big Bang was the Big Bang, then those are the facts. But all extrapolations from that, hypotheses regarding what came before it or why it happened, aren't scientific at all.

[mastermg]

Quote:Warning: Tangential Rant

The Big Bang pisses me off because it first of all doesn't answer any question at all, because what came before the big bang? And secondly, people's conclusions regarding it are dogmatic, whether religious in the sense of believing the big bang to be "the divine spark" or 'scientific' in believing nothing pertaining to our understanding of physical universe existed before it.

I mean, if the Big Bang was the Big Bang, then those are the facts. But all extrapolations from that, hypotheses regarding what came before it or why it happened, aren't scientific at all.

I never agreed to the theory myself, it originated from somewhere out of this dimension I believe. That still fits these miracles anyway but people are drawing strict conclusions from man-made theories which is illogical.

[Jobujack]

Here's the funny part of the big bang theory, neither Science or Religion will ever be able to prove either side true or false!!!

JJ

[---]

Quote:Warning: Tangential Rant

The Big Bang pisses me off because it first of all doesn't answer any question at all, because what came before the big bang? And secondly, people's conclusions regarding it are dogmatic, whether religious in the sense of believing the big bang to be "the divine spark" or 'scientific' in believing nothing pertaining to our understanding of physical universe existed before it.

I mean, if the Big Bang was the Big Bang, then those are the facts. But all extrapolations from that, hypotheses regarding what came before it or why it happened, aren't scientific at all.

I agree with MMG about the collision of dimensions thing. Sounds as plausible as any other theory surrounding the subject.

[mmstick]

I'm all into studying all theoretical things.

Time doesn't exist. Past, present, future. They are all just separate dimensions.
We just move through them like frames in a video.
String theory would go to show that depending on what you do here and there will place you onto another dimension.
Every dimension is another possibility. What if you said this or did that? In another dimension you branched off into that other dimension.

But that being said they are still just theories. Interesting but I am not sure that humans could understand it. The multiverse isn't easily understood by people.

a planet among many planets
a solar system among many solar systems
a galaxy among many galaxies
Whats after that? Uncertain at that point

Then we have the universe is just one in a collection of universes
and it could be possible that the multiverse is a collection of multiverses.

Overall we can't be so sure that we know ANYTHING.
Just a bunch of "stupid Earth brains" as one person said.

[horseonwheels]

"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? Q 21:30"

Clove them assunder is the best translation possible I believe, but the mental image of the orginal text is that of a swinging hatchet. When it hits the target piece of wood there will be scattering and small fractions are flying away from the wood. For long I pointed at that and said : "HA! that's the big bang!" ...But that is just because the description fits with a small stretch of imagination. There are many options, and I am not sure what the above means at all. From a purely historic perspective it is very interresting that a cavedwelling nomad in the desert sands of Arabia was even thinking about such concepts as the beginning of the universe (for that you have to understand that there IS a universe), and came up with a model that does not involve the giant flying turtles and worms which previous generations had come up with.

I still think that the potentially most interresting phenomena in the Quran- that we can test- is the 19 code. I am not a submitter, nor a fan of the idolatry they have takenupon themself, but it would take a hardline fool to deny that there seems to be such a code present, that or someone just happened to be really into things that are devisible by the number 19 when it was written down. The other part I think is very very interresting is the Qurans use of self-reference.

For centuries, Aristotle’s rule of the "Excluded middle" has been used. This rule is a proposition that states, "Every proposition is either true or false." Somebody was smart enough to question that very proposition. What if that proposition that states that every proposition is either true or false is false? People had overlooked that for centuries. Not so the Quran. If the Quran is what it claims to be then it should be aware of self-reference, as applied to its own statements. Examples: (a thank you to brother Muhammad asadi)

The example of Jesus with God is like that of Adam. He created him from dust and said to him, "Be," and he was 3:59

The meaning of the statement is clear. Jesus being born without a father is like Adam’s creation. The new "mitochondrial eve" theory of humankind’s descent gives even more credence to this comparison as it was a woman from whom the human race descended and Jesus had a mother only, as well.

However, in the mention of words, it says that the word "Jesus (Eesa)," in the Koran is like the word "Adam." It is surprising to note that indeed the word "Jesus (Eesa) [page 494 of the Index]" in its mention in the Koran is like the mention of the word "Adam [page 24 of the index]," Both words occur in the Koran twenty five times. Not only that, it is in the same order of succession. The verse that mentions that they are like each other is the seventh time the word "Jesus" is mentioned and the seventh time "Adam" is mentioned.

The example of a "Dog":

"The example of him [who forsook our signs] is as the example of the dog. If you attack him he pants with his tongue out and if you leave him alone he does the same. Such is the example of THE NATION WHICH DENIES OUR REVELATIONS… (7:176)."

The Arabic word used for dog is "Kalb(singular)". The word for "dog" in the singular occurs in the Koran five times. The statement, "Nation which denies our revelations," occurs five times in the Koran also. Chapter 7:176 is the first time the word "dog (singular)" is mentioned in the Koran (see page 614 of the above mentioned index), and the first time the statement,, "The nation which denies our revelations (page 583-584 of the index)," is mentioned. Therefore the example of the "The nation which denies our revelations" is as the example of a dog (Kalb), in the mention or words.

etc..