|
Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
|
|
03-20-2011, 10:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 12:04 AM by hubbabubba.)
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
I recommend listening to this press conference.
Update: "The French nuclear agency IRSN said Friday that the Fukushima Daiichi plant had already released 10% as much radioactivity as Chernobyl, though the agency has been accused by some as being alarmist." LA Times |
|||
|
03-21-2011, 12:45 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 03:19 AM by Telecaster72.)
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
Points taken.
Now before i delve into the links you provided here to educate myself on the mess, there is just one more thing on the OT branch that has evolved here ![]() About the brain hemispheres. Quote:It should be balanced with the left brain at all times. Yes, however that does not mean that the ratio has to be static and both halves at 50% at all times. You can walk in perfect balance, shifting body weight back and forth to each foot. That is why we have two feet, and two brain hemispheres Ok back into harsh reality...sigh...thanks for the links, appreciate them! "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you." - The Gospel of Thomas I think I am, therefore I am, i think... - George Carlin |
|||
|
03-21-2011, 03:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 03:14 AM by Telecaster72.)
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
Ok, i took the plunge and looked around and....damn....
Nice move to raise the safe levels of radiation, unbelievable. I dont remember where i read it but they have to manage cooling down for "several weeks" before the fuel has reached less critical temperatures. Radiation in japanese tapwater Quote:The science ministry said Saturday a minuscule amount of radioactive substances was detected in tap water in Tokyo, as well as Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba and Saitama prefectures. The article doen't state what kind of Iodine or Cesium, but the one used in nuclear applications seems to be Iodine-131 that has a half-life of a measly 8 days as compared to 30 years in Cesium-137. I have looked for alternative japanese news sources, but came up short, would have been easier if i read japanese though.. "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you." - The Gospel of Thomas I think I am, therefore I am, i think... - George Carlin |
|||
|
03-21-2011, 06:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 06:42 AM by hubbabubba.)
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
(03-21-2011 12:45 AM)Telecaster72 Wrote: You can walk in perfect balance, shifting body weight back and forth to each foot. That is why we have two feet, and two brain hemispheres That's what's called reason or reasonable? (03-21-2011 03:09 AM)Telecaster72 Wrote: Nice move to raise the safe levels of radiation, unbelievable. Where, what, why? Quote:I dont remember where i read it but they have to manage cooling down for "several weeks" before the fuel has reached less critical temperatures. Guess there's lots of "small" problems to consider in the future. Hrrmm... Ooops... Quote:The article doen't state what kind of Iodine or Cesium, but the one used in nuclear applications seems to be Iodine-131 that has a half-life of a measly 8 days as compared to 30 years in Cesium-137. If it is because of the accident, I wonder how it reached the tapwater so soon? Nice to have a research partner! Welcome to the team! ![]() Edit: This is a source I completely forgot:IAEA |
|||
|
03-21-2011, 12:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 02:16 PM by Telecaster72.)
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
Hubba, It was the safe lefel for workers inside the plants that was raised from 100 to 250 microsieverts (or milli) for them to be able to enter the site.
To visualize what i mean about balance: dynamic balance: ![]() static balance: ![]() -------------------------------------------------- Even our good old friend WHO warns of radiated food: reuters Quote:"From reports I have heard so far, it seems that the levels of radioactive iodine and caesium in milk and some foodstuffs are significantly higher than government limits," said Jim Smith, a specialist in earth and environmental sciences at Britain's Portsmouth University. IAEA also concerned over food situation Quote:Measurements at a location about 46 km from the plant showed iodine 131 levels in milk up to 15 times above the level suitable for infants, he said. For spinach, detected levels were also many times above the limit. How did it enter the tapwater? Usually water to be purified resides in open pools during the process like this one:
"If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you." - The Gospel of Thomas I think I am, therefore I am, i think... - George Carlin |
|||
|
03-21-2011, 02:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 07:19 PM by Telecaster72.)
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
Kyodo News has regular updates on the progress (or lack of). They are a non profit news agency so hopefully they are out of the claws of corporate control. But hey, who knows?Kyodo News on Wikipedia
(whole article) --> Japanese government raises standard for decontamination, and urges poulation to not take iodine supplements. Quote:Meanwhile, the government's task force to tackle nuclear accidents instructed municipal governments near the crisis-hit Fukushima plant on Monday to ease conditions under which they require people to undergo mandatory decontamination. (whole article) -->greater levels of radioactive levels found due to rain Quote:Far greater amounts of radioactive iodine and cesium were found in rain, dust and particles in the air in some areas over a 24-hour period from Sunday morning due to rainfall, the science ministry said Monday. "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you." - The Gospel of Thomas I think I am, therefore I am, i think... - George Carlin |
|||
|
03-21-2011, 05:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 05:08 PM by hubbabubba.)
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
(03-21-2011 12:58 PM)Telecaster72 Wrote: Hubba, It was the safe lefel for workers inside the plants that was raised from 100 to 250 microsieverts (or milli) for them to be able to enter the site. Easy fix. Quote:To visualize what i mean about balance: Yes, that sounds reasonable. I guess the right side is more about imagination than feelings. The feelings reside in the mammal brain. Or so they say... Quote:Even our good old friend WHO warns of radiated food: Many different opinions it seems. Quote:How did it enter the tapwater? Usually water to be purified resides in open pools during the process like this one: That was fast. Now there's smoke in number three, no it died, now there's smoke in number two, nobody knows why and the american atomic something says everything is under control?!?! |
|||
|
03-21-2011, 06:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2011 07:00 PM by Telecaster72.)
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
Quote:That was fast.I am only guessing, i would think processed water could come in contact with airborne radiation and fallout on numbers of occations, different pools inside and outside the facility, without being very knowlegeable in the area i can say it is not a hermetically sealed process. The water to be cleaned also comes from somewhere that has exposure, like lakes, reservoirs, rivers and such. Tokyo is not supplied by well-water thats for sure. Quote:Now there's smoke in number three, no it died, now there's smoke in number two, nobody knows why and the american atomic something says everything is under control?!?! See my earlier post: Quote:l: data overload.processing power insufficient.more data needed. data overload.processing power insufficient.more data needed :ll (rinse and repeat) edit: Need to add "conflicting data input" and "accurate data needed" to that error message. "If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you." - The Gospel of Thomas I think I am, therefore I am, i think... - George Carlin |
|||
|
03-22-2011, 05:13 PM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
URGENT: Radiation 1,600 times normal level 20 km from Fukushima plant: IAEA - Kyodo News
So, how dangerous is this? Can't find any info on IAEA's site. I think this would be a 7 on the Ines scale. i.e. Major Accident. And as the thread implies this is possibly a new 8. If the Ines rating is downplayed not to create panic, what good is a rating scale then? If it always takes months to admit that the accident was bigger then the last biggest event, doesn't that make the scale more of a problem than a solution? |
|||
|
03-22-2011, 08:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-22-2011 09:13 PM by springhawk.)
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
(03-22-2011 05:13 PM)hubbabubba Wrote: URGENT: Radiation 1,600 times normal level 20 km from Fukushima plant: IAEA - Kyodo News Still no need to create a classification for this event. The INES seems to know what they are doing. Furthermore, there were two EXPLOSIONS and a MELTDOWN at Chernobyl. [EDIT Added missing link] My Psychiatrist Committed Suicide "I'm going to tell you something you won't believe." David Vincent |
|||
|
04-01-2011, 08:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-01-2011 08:48 PM by hubbabubba.)
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
I haven't updated this thread as planned. I guess most following the news have noticed that this Major Accident is far from over. To me it's quite clear it's at least Ines 7.
I have no links right now but: There might be a total meltdown in reactor nr 2. Possibly in some of the others also. The evacuation zone is expanding. Higher and higher fallout readings are coming farther and farther away from the accident site. Very high radiation is measured in the ocean. It is going to take months to control the accident site, if ever totally. Raising the levels of safe exposure in nature, water and food will never be the solution to nuclear accidents. |
|||
|
04-02-2011, 04:41 AM
Post: #27
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
We're all fucked by this... big time. It makes me want to kill the talking heads that poo-poo the dangers.
|
|||
|
04-12-2011, 06:06 PM
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
Japan ups Fukushima nuke crisis severity to 7, same as Chernobyl
So now it's Ines 7, and sometime in the future it will be a 8 or a completely new scale. I'm not happy about being right, but as I said, you don't have to be a nuclear scientist to figure this one out. |
|||
|
05-13-2011, 03:26 AM
Post: #29
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
No.1 reactor is in a "meltdown" state
Quote:Tokyo Electric Power Company says the No.1 reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is believed to be in a state of "meltdown". The Anthem |
|||
|
01-02-2012, 11:50 PM
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Time for a new International Nuclear Event Scale?
Haven't heard much lately. James Corbett has a new site :Fukushimaupdate.
I don't know how bad it is today, guess it fell into the memory hole. Anyone know anything? |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)






![[Image: 29opxrm.jpg]](http://i52.tinypic.com/29opxrm.jpg)
![[Image: 2vaghlj.jpg]](http://i55.tinypic.com/2vaghlj.jpg)
