Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

crystal · (This post was last modified: 08-23-2010 04:10 PM by crystal.)

********************************

~~nik~~ · (This post was last modified: 08-23-2010 04:10 PM by nik.)

(08-23-2010 04:01 PM)eyeland Wrote:
(08-23-2010 01:51 PM)nik Wrote: yeah right and we know what you look like too.

Your problem here is that you just made a cheap tabloid style shot and expected it not to be read as such. That makes it real stinky IMO

you dont come across at all like a british govt.employee or possibly miffed govt. sponsored channel 4 911 docu filmmaker even possibly.

"Stand on a table and look at our thumb!"

pffft

Shock horror. A meeja f*ckerer avoiding a question and then going into "you must be a government operative" mode. Surprise surprise.

I obviously want Shacks identity so me and the rest of the goverment shill mass murderers can track him down and snuff him out for revealing the truth about our evil fakey crime...

(cue maniacal laughter echoing round our big underground tv fakery studio)

The point is petal, that the video that I linked to in the 'originals thread' is on my youtube channel and there are a number of videos that include my appearance.

Continue to trot giddily down the September Clues cul-de-sac if you must, but ask yourself, do you know what he looks like, does anyone?

Why?

yeah yeah whatever.

there is almost equal chance of him being a shill as you are, really-- - i'll choose to look at it that -more likely it is a case of trying to be a "research superstar" attacking that site though. thanks indeed i will go over to you tube so i know what you look like. that will be good.

"Why???" lol

eyeland · 08-23-2010, 05:14 PM

Quote:yeah yeah whatever.

there is almost equal chance of him being a shill as you are,

I suppose there is. Technically. But I dont see Shack as a shill. Although he may well be.

But no. I see him more as a Pied Piper type with his giddy band of Shackites (rhyming slang intended) all hot on the trail of the next big "fakery" scoop..."Anyone who disagrees with september clues is a computer generated illusion!!!" Or something.

It's a shame that crystal removed the picture she posted of "shack's identity". It would be nice to see your messiah in the flesh so to speak. Even if it was only a picture of a silhouette. Yet he continues to be as elusive as the other "god".

By your own standards posting a picture of a silhouette is surely an example of media fakery and therefore we must conclude that either crystal is a mass murderer protecting shill or Shack doesn't exist.

Quote: really-- - i'll choose to look at it that -more likely it is a case of trying to be a "research superstar" attacking that site though.

Not really sure what this means. A research superstar? Attacking that site?What the bejeezus are you on about sir?

Quote: thanks indeed i will go over to you tube so i know what you look like. that will be good.[

Dont get your hopes up too much. It's just me prattling on about this that and the other.

Hey maybe you can find some examples of "f*ckery" in the vids and then convince me that I dont exist.

Quote:"Why???" lol

Wow. I didn't realise a word like 'why' could be such comedy gold....

Hold on to your funny bone matey....Who! - Where! - What! - How!!!

Lollazalllooo

~~nik~~ · (This post was last modified: 08-23-2010 06:24 PM by nik.)

(08-23-2010 05:14 PM)eyeland Wrote:
Quote:yeah yeah whatever.

there is almost equal chance of him being a shill as you are,

I suppose there is. Technically. But I dont see Shack as a shill. Although he may well be.

But no. I see him more as a Pied Piper type with his giddy band of Shackites (rhyming slang intended) all hot on the trail of the next big "fakery" scoop..."Anyone who disagrees with september clues is a computer generated illusion!!!" Or something.

It's a shame that crystal removed the picture she posted of "shack's identity". It would be nice to see your messiah in the flesh so to speak. Even if it was only a picture of a silhouette. Yet he continues to be as elusive as the other "god".

By your own standards posting a picture of a silhouette is surely an example of media fakery and therefore we must conclude that either crystal is a mass murderer protecting shill or Shack doesn't exist.

Quote: really-- - i'll choose to look at it that -more likely it is a case of trying to be a "research superstar" attacking that site though.

Not really sure what this means. A research superstar? Attacking that site?What the bejeezus are you on about sir?

Quote: thanks indeed i will go over to you tube so i know what you look like. that will be good.[

Dont get your hopes up too much. It's just me prattling on about this that and the other.

Hey maybe you can find some examples of "f*ckery" in the vids and then convince me that I dont exist.

Quote:"Why???" lol

Wow. I didn't realise a word like 'why' could be such comedy gold....

Hold on to your funny bone matey....Who! - Where! - What! - How!!!

Lollazalllooo

SIGH. I just want to lurk okay, mr. comedy -- I DONT HAVE A MESSIAH AND I AM NOT A "shackite" . prick.

you're pissing me off with your emo lets be a wise ass and appeal to the crowd to "prove" tv fakery is such a joke! come on everybody!! hohoho. you're not so funny smuglord and it is tres cheapo tactics. you're not worth the $

do have the good grace of just bouncing your spiel off some other ok. i dont want to have to reply to any more of more donkey braying posts ok?

you dont need me for your shack character assassination mission. (i'd like to see you try be this cocky to me in RL) so just leave me out of it, twinkle toes. ok?good.

eyeland · 08-23-2010, 06:30 PM

Quote:SIGH. I just want to lurk okay, mr. comedy -- I DONT HAVE A MESSIAH AND I AM NOT A "shackite" . prick.

Dear oh dear. What a tirade of abuse. Alas it's always the same with the shackites. Disagree with them or question their belief system and within a couple of posts it's always the same response.

Quote:you're pissing me off with your emo lets be a wise ass and appeal to the crowd to "prove" tv fakery is such a joke! come on everybody!! hohoho. you're not so funny smuglord and it is tres cheapo tactics. you're not worth the $

So does this mean you still think I'm a "government operative" or not?

Quote:do me the good grace of just bouncing your spiel off some other ok.

How about addressing the issues in my first post in this thread?There's some good points. Some not so good. Fancy trying to discern them?

Quote: i dont want to have to reply to any more of more donkey braying posts ok?

You dont have to.

Quote:you dont need me for your shack character assassination mission. (i'd like to see you try be this cocky to me in RL) so just leave me out of it.

Character assassination mission? where have I said a single derogatory thing about shack? I have a lot of respect for shack as it happens. He's a clever man. It's just the majority of his followers that leave a lot to be desired. It's like they all go to abuse-school or something. Is this what they teach you over at the s.c. forum?

By the way, forgive my lack of knowledge but what is RL?

I'll promise to be as cocky if you promise to be as abusive.Deal?

~~nik~~ · 08-23-2010, 06:34 PM

http://concen.org/forum/showthread.php?t...#pid197437

~~nik~~ · (This post was last modified: 08-23-2010 08:39 PM by nik.)

(08-23-2010 06:30 PM)eyeland Wrote:
Quote:SIGH. I just want to lurk okay, mr. comedy -- I DONT HAVE A MESSIAH AND I AM NOT A "shackite" . prick.

Dear oh dear. What a tirade of abuse. Alas it's always the same with the shackites. Disagree with them or question their belief system and within a couple of posts it's always the same response.

Quote:you're pissing me off with your emo lets be a wise ass and appeal to the crowd to "prove" tv fakery is such a joke! come on everybody!! hohoho. you're not so funny smuglord and it is tres cheapo tactics. you're not worth the $

So does this mean you still think I'm a "government operative" or not?

Quote:do me the good grace of just bouncing your spiel off some other ok.

How about addressing the issues in my first post in this thread?There's some good points. Some not so good. Fancy trying to discern them?

Quote: i dont want to have to reply to any more of more donkey braying posts ok?

You dont have to.

Quote:you dont need me for your shack character assassination mission. (i'd like to see you try be this cocky to me in RL) so just leave me out of it.

Character assassination mission? where have I said a single derogatory thing about shack? I have a lot of respect for shack as it happens. He's a clever man. It's just the majority of his followers that leave a lot to be desired. It's like they all go to abuse-school or something. Is this what they teach you over at the s.c. forum?

By the way, forgive my lack of knowledge but what is RL?

I'll promise to be as cocky if you promise to be as abusive.Deal?

IZzZATSo0?

Well, eyeland-- there was silly me thinking that you posting in multiple threads about what does Simon Shack look like why is there no pictures??? kind of led credence to the idea of maybe just mayybee you attempting to insinuate he was a disinformation agent. silly old me. dear dear

Tell you what also-- no, until yesterday I have been a Concen Admin since late 2007 and have made a total of about 4or 5 posts on Shack's forum --- please consult this thread for his reply to me and the reference guide he made of his site for me,you, all here and those who want to look into it.

No deal btw-- stop causing me to reply to you and you willnot have to put up with any abuse from me, S M U G L O R D <<

Icon_biggrin

SIGH
Look,I can see you making yet another reply now to another of my posts onthe board in efforts to stir up shit and try andget the boot in, RL is real life and you would be nervous right now if I was there with you in yours.. and I know you have to reply too as that is what you need do isnt it? But -- to whatever it says--- whatever

keeping on plucking that chicken, senor -- *vanishes*

eyeland · 08-23-2010, 08:39 PM

Quote:IZzZATSo0?

Well, eyeland-- there was silly me thinking that you posting in multiple threads about what does Simon Shack look like why is there no pictures??? kind of led credence to the idea of maybe just mayybee you attempting to insinuate he was a disinformation agent. silly old me. dear dear

Me? Insinuate? No. It's an interesting question though. What does he look like? Why no pictures? There may be some out there. I just haven't seen any. Ever.

By the way, "multiple threads"? Please excuse my lack of understanding here but on what other threads have I posted the question of Shacks identity? I cant remember any others. Only this one. Give us the links mate. It will have been awhile ago. If at all. I need to see the threads to verify.

Quote:Tell you what also-- no, until yesterday I have been a Concen Admin since late 2007 and have made a total of about 4or 5 posts on Shack's forum --- please consult this thread for his reply to me and the reference guide he made of his site for me,you, all here and those who want to look into it.

Commiserations on the admin status removal. I think it's unfair if you've been stripped of this purely on the basis of believing something. If that's the case of course. However, I did not make the decision to do this so I do not know.

I can honestly say that over the last few years I've studied at length many of the videos that have been touted as "proof" of TVF and NPT and I have found them all to be severly lacking. Some seemingly being intentionally bogus.

I have also studied S.C. and visited the S.C. forum on the odd occassion (never joining or posting though) but have never been entirely convinced. Although I must say the Rob Howard photo mix up on CH 4's 9/11 hotel is puzzling to say the least. But it requires further research on my part.

Quote:No deal btw--

Fair enough.

Quote: stop causing me to reply to you and you willnot have to put up with any abuse from me, S M U G L O R D <<

I dont mind the abuse at all. It reminds me that most if not all of the fakery crowd have a very short fuse. They dont half get their knickers in a twist if you question their faith.

Quote:

Glad you can still smile even whilst recognising your somewhat abusive temperament.

~~nik~~ · 08-23-2010, 08:47 PM

i wouldn't be so abusive if only you didnt reek of such a foul rank odiferous punge and suddenly splat here you are again out of the blue the years long researcher into video fakery and how it is "intentionally bogus". It is a conspiracy board not a coincidence board.

and the emotive based calm as pie retorts.

i like in Dick's blade runner where he says "...fucker" -- etiquettey isn't even part of the equation

I am going to PMs only but will persist in this unless you just get over your "oh gosh what absolutely frightfully repellent behaviour, I say, how dreadfully coarse.!" BS

eyeland · 08-23-2010, 09:13 PM

(08-23-2010 08:47 PM)nik Wrote: i wouldn't be so abusive if only you didnt reek of such a foul rank odiferous punge and suddenly splat here

That's quite poetic. This shows, along with your belief system, a great imagination.

Quote:you are again out of the blue the years long researcher into video fakery and how it is "intentionally bogus".

Now now. Be fair. I didn't say that TVF is intentionally bogus per se did I nik.

No. I said that, in regard to the videos, "Some seemingly being intentionally bogus." But it's just my opinion.

By the way, where are the links to the "multiple threads" nik?

Quote:It is a conspiracy board not a coincidence board.

I often find that 'coincidence' pops up quite a lot in conspiracy based material. Like Shacks 9/11 Propaganda film which lists many coincidences regarding the "witnesses". Are you saying that shacks film shouldn't be posted here because it contains coincidences?

Quote:and the emotive based calm as pie retorts.

What do you want me to do? Be equally as abusive as you? Ok. Here goes...err...You - you - TV Fakery believer you (whince -that must hurt)

Quote:i like in Dick's blade runner where he says "...fucker" -- etiquettey isn't even part of the equation

I like swearing too. But not all the time.

Quote:I am going to PMs only but will persist in this unless you just get over your "oh gosh what absolutely frightfully repellent behaviour, I say, how dreadfully coarse.!" BS

Come on nik. I told you I dont mind the abuse. Hurl away. What does worry me though (but only slightly) is that you seem to disregard most of the content of my posts as if you haven't seen them and merely persist with misconceptions of myself as well as ignoring my questions.

That's puzzling and worrying behaviour. But also interesting.

Can I see the "multiple threads" link now me old china?

~~nik~~ · (This post was last modified: 08-23-2010 09:25 PM by nik.)

keep on going -- you are outing your textbook M O

i may have made an error in saying thread instead of posts--- i'm not even going to check it out!! --- keep on totally focusing on it, it outs your more and more apparent textbook M O

me old china

very lucky both those birds made target eh? what if one of them had just clipped the building eh? they would have been stamping mad not being ablke to detonate the building anymore !! hehe and such speeds for commercial travel! physics is boggled about it still. not like the shanksville and the pentagon where no planes is more clear eh?

very lucky both those birds made target eh? what if one of them had just clipped the building. they would have been stamping mad about not being able to convincingly detonate the bugger, i imagine with my oh so big imagination. And such speeds. physics is boggled about it still. not like the shanksville and the pentagon where no planes is more clear eh?

eyeland · 08-23-2010, 09:23 PM

(08-23-2010 09:16 PM)nik Wrote: keep on going -- you are outing your textbook M O

i may have made an error in saying thread instead of posts --- keep on totally focusing on it,it outs your textbook M O
me old china

Textbook MO hey? What is that exactly? Thanks for the "error" admission though.

It shouldn't amaze me after all these years that most if not every single TVF stalwart I've ever communicated with resorts to the "you are a shill" accusation at some point within a conversation.

It shouldn't amaze me but it does.

~~nik~~ · (This post was last modified: 08-23-2010 09:30 PM by nik.)

(08-23-2010 09:23 PM)eyeland Wrote:
(08-23-2010 09:16 PM)nik Wrote: keep on going -- you are outing your textbook M O

i may have made an error in saying thread instead of posts --- keep on totally focusing on it,it outs your textbook M O
me old china

Textbook MO hey? What is that exactly? Thanks for the "error" admission though.

It shouldn't amaze me after all these years that most if not every single TVF stalwart I've ever communicated with resorts to the "you are a shill" accusation at some point within a conversation.

It shouldn't amaze me but it does.

part of the textbook MO i imagine with my oh so too big imagination as you suggest it, would be the obvious adoption of pathos and appealing ti the crowd.

stalwart?? LOL

the problem for all you "i havelooked into tv fakery for years now and can only conclude it is intentionally bogus" line spouting monolithic debunkers and misdirectors of anyone thinking about looking into it is that the research is not at all confined to video imagery as your monolgue suggests but you omit to cede that because how couldn't you?

eyeland · 08-23-2010, 09:47 PM

Quote:part of the textbook MO i imagine with my oh so too big imagination as you suggest it, would be the obvious adoption of pathos and appealing ti the crowd.

There goes that healthy imagination again. Not only are you imagining an MO here but also the textbook it's written in.

I'm naturally a polite person nik. Obviously not all the time. I have my moments like anyone else. You over the last few posts for example. Icon_biggrin

Quote:stalwart?? LOL

You seem to be randomly tickled by words very often nik. First "why" and now "stalwart". Bet you were a nuisance in english school lessons...

Teacher : "Today class we are going to look at the word "inkling"...

You : "Lol lol lol lol"

Teacher : "Oh nik, not again"

Quote:the problem for all you "i havelooked into tv fakery for years now and can only conclude it is intentionally bogus" line spouting monolithic debunkers and misdirectors of anyone thinking about looking into it is that the research is not at all confined to video imagery as your monolgue suggests but you omit to cede that because how couldn't you?

I've already said that the rob howard photo mix up is strange.

Why do you keep ignoring what I say?

~~nik~~ · (This post was last modified: 08-23-2010 10:09 PM by nik.)

changing tack.txt.?

photo mix up? -- hurray, post all about it

town crier alert status updated

I actually meant research far beyond the confines of A/V

yes, we all had at least one real scumbag teacher. i like that you reference to my earlier years, my youthful daze whilst in sk00ling --- i used the very same tactic against deathanyl just the other day. it works on some, doesn't it just?

nice jokes! ha really ha ha! great stuff, eyeland. I used to like your astrology stuff too, such a shame to find out youre just on board to fillet what you think are fish

leave me out of it - i think i already unequivocally stated this request some posts back now. text. abt.clssc.mo OUP2010