Ban anyone who only come to Concen to attack

[Diceman]

There are people on the site who only make comments to attack and/or upload content with the aim of attacking somebody (Alex Jones mainly).

I'm not one for restricting speech because someone has a different opinion but the climate is turning increasingly hostile of late.
Conspiracy Central should be about interesting content, not serve as a platform to attack Alex Jones.

[joeblow]

You are right, because it is anti-Semitic to attack Shabbos Jones.

[Hans Olo]

> I'm not one for restricting speech because someone has a different opinion but ... Ban anyone who only come to Concen to attack

That, my friends, is doublethink in its purest form. "I'm for free speech, but ..."

Diceman, you have 13 posts and already know how to run this site? Isn't that really special.

[psilocybin]

(02-26-2010 07:00 PM)Hans Olo Wrote:  > Diceman, you have 13 posts and already know how to run this site? Isn't that really special.

Indeed.

[Apocalypso Now!]

diceman Wrote:Thankfully I don't have to rely solely on torrents as prisonplanet.tv generously allows you do download the commercial-free 64kbps podcast after your membership has expired (not sure for how long though).

**engage speech unit *AJ. is. a .very .generous .man ** fzzt*beep

[Easy Skanking]

Everyone is banned for daring to voice an opinion at all.
I am now banned too for expressing my opinion against my own wishes.

[Hans Olo]

I'll tell you who got banned.

Me!

From the Prisonplanet forum for criticizing moderator 'Sane' for trolling, attacking me and escalating the situation by openly calling me cointelpro and similar things instead of doing his job and "moderating".

Btw, show me the thread on the Prisonplanet forum about how Alex crashed the Texas gun rights rally. Where is it?

So, please don't lecture this board on restricting free speech.

[Shinobi]

Ban everyone and lets put our telepathic gifts to good use instead

[---]

This is outrageous, one of the admins should ban this forum right now.

eidt) aha! not only could I not read your mind IC1 but evidently I also can't read. Good idea - I support it, Ban this forum now!

[SiLVa]

(02-26-2010 07:00 PM)Hans Olo Wrote:  Diceman, you have 13 posts and already know how to run this site? Isn't that really special...

...Btw, show me the thread on the Prisonplanet forum about how Alex crashed the Texas gun rights rally. Where is it?

lol ownage...

And Diceman, even though you look up to an asshat like AJ, we wont go and censor your comments like AJ's site does.
I suggest you do a little digging into AJ and his operation before you go about defending his honor.

[Diceman]

(02-26-2010 07:00 PM)Hans Olo Wrote:  > I'm not one for restricting speech because someone has a different opinion but ... Ban anyone who only come to Concen to attack

That, my friends, is doublethink in its purest form. "I'm for free speech, but ..."

My point is what does Easy Skanking or Yeti want the purpose of the site to be? By your logic trolls on a site should be allowed free reign as this falls under free speech.

Just get a bit annoying when there's a sustained campaign of nasty spiteful comments under any Alex Jones material. And torrents with the purpose of bashing someone within the patriot movement appear on a regular basis. It's like he's worse than David Rockerfeller in these parts.

But Easy Skanking obviously has no problem with this so a victory for the AJ haters I guess.

Actually, a better solution would be to have an "ignore" option so you can ignore anything from a particular user.

[Hans Olo]

> Just get a bit annoying when there's a sustained campaign of nasty spiteful comments under any Alex Jones material.

The forum has other functions than to avoid annoying you. It couldn't care less whether you are annoyed or not.

Telling the difference between somebody who is just trolling and somebody who just disagrees with you on something is not easy, and frankly, it's a problem on many forums. I'd say you should have to live with somebody spewing hate against Alex or any other person as long as they are not attacking YOU personally and unreasonably.

Secondly, what is it with you and free speech?

You think free speech means you can come to a private forum and say whatever you want to whomever you want? That is not free speech. This forum is sort of like a private club, there are rules. The rules state what you can do on this forum and what not. You agree to these rules by joining the forum. Look at it as a contract. There is no free speech on this or any other forum as far as I know. And "not bashing Alex Jones or any other of Diceman's favorite" is not one of these rules. Trolling, for example attacking other forum members personally and unfairly, can be something that is forbidden by rules.

Again, this has nothing to do with your right to say whatever you want *in public* which is the right to free speech you're referring to. Are you telling me there is free speech in your house? Is it OK if I come to your house and call your wife a whore? Well maybe you would allow me to, but the point is, you could stop me. It's your house, your rules.

Tell me I'm wrong. Am I wrong?

Btw. as you were referring to my logic: My logic was just pointing out the flaw in your logic, that is, saying you don't wanna restrict "free speech" but wanting to ban people who bash e.g. Alex Jones at the same time. One sentence later. That's double-think, or call it cognitive dissonance, a paradox.

You still don't see that even after I pointed out for you? How do you do it?

[Melchor]

Free Speech != Heckler's Veto

Other than that I agree with everything everyone else who isn't Diceman posted on this subject.

Also, Fuck Alex Jones. Fuck his ego. Fuck his making conspiracists look like nutters. Fuck his drooling troglodyte lemming cult followers. Fuck his destructive personal politics. Fuck his false humility. Fuck his fear mongering webmasters. Fuck his playing loose with the facts. Fuck his badmouthing everyone that he rolls over. And fuck his poor me always playing the victim in such situations.

[Shinobi]

10 fucks .. thats a lot of fucking Melchor

[Melchor]

Yeah. I probably could have added more. But I thought that ten was sufficient to qualify it as a flaming fist post.