Bush And Saddam Should Both Stand Trial, Says Nuremberg Prosecutor

[Shinobi]

Bush and Saddam Should Both Stand Trial, Says Nuremberg Prosecutor

'A chief prosecutor of Nazi war crimes at Nuremberg has said George W. Bush should be tried for war crimes along with Saddam Hussein. Benjamin Ferencz, who secured convictions for 22 Nazi officers for their work in orchestrating the death squads that killed more than 1 million people, told OneWorld both Bush and Saddam should be tried for starting "aggressive" wars--Saddam for his 1990 attack on Kuwait and Bush for his 2003 invasion of Iraq.

"Nuremberg declared that aggressive war is the supreme international crime," the 87-year-old Ferencz told OneWorld from his home in New York. He said the United Nations charter, which was written after the carnage of World War II, contains a provision that no nation can use armed force without the permission of the UN Security Council.'

Read More
http://us.oneworld.net/article/view/138319/1/

(cheers to david icke)

[tsoldrin]

Does the U.S. get to try him for treason first? Hows the jurisdiction work with that?

[harflimon]

Your country has to lose the war for you to be tried for war crimes. No court is going to over-rule your army:P

Anyway I'm pretty sure America has refused to join the World Court. Also anything that the U.N. tries to pass we can just veto so there really is no jurisdiction over Bush. The only way other countries could get him is if they went to war with us. Only way we can get him is if we impeach him or revolt.

[High_Treason]

I doubt that this will make any difference, Kissinger, Sharon, Assad, Bush sr....none of them stood trail I don't think Bush jr would

[tsoldrin]

Well, I'm for revolt, but I don't think the masses will join unless their cable cuts out during American Idol or something tragic like that happens.;)