Dissipation Of Darkness - Origins Of Masonry, Is It Authentic?

[ov3rkomer]

Quote:People talk about authencity of "protocols of Elders of zion". Is there anyway to prove it? Only One way I guess.
See if it fits.

Quote: "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.
Henry Ford in the New York World, February 17th, 1921

They fit, even today.

So is the case of G.S. Lawrence's "dissipation of darkness".
Information balance the equation and Fits into chain of events

The Protocols are different form Dissipation of Darkness, in that they talk about their immediate plans starting around 1900, whereas Dissipation of Darkness talks about ancient history. Obviously the Protocols fit the NWO developments in the last 100 years. This proves they were written by someone with insider knowledge of The Plan. It does not prove an exclusively Zionist conspiracy (even though I do not dismiss this possibility). They could have been written by another elite group in order to divert attention from themselves and to scapegoat the Jews.

Dissipation of Darkness, claims to trace Freemasonry to a group of Jews in the year 43AD. It has weaker documentary evidence than the Protocols. It claims to quote original dialog between those Jews and King Herod. This is all very interesting and somewhat believable, but without some expert examination of the internal evidence and original documents it is presumpteous to give it much credence. Historical examination from 43AD to 1717AD would also have to corroborate a systematic opposition to Christianity by the Mysterious Force. This evidence is not really conclusive. After 1717 the record of Freemasonry is well documented, but I think the definite proof that it has always been controlled by Jews at the highest level is hard to come by.