Toward A North American Union

[Solve et Coagula]

The idea of a North American Union is a brilliant one, but these meetings in secrecy are ridiculous, where went to freedom and democracy?

Toward a North American Union
Volume 6, Issue 5

By: Patrick Wood, Editor, The August Review

Introduction

The global elite, through the direct operations of President George Bush and his Administration, are creating a North American Union that will combine Canada, Mexico and the U.S. into a superstate called the North American Union (NAU). The NAU is roughly patterned after the European Union (EU). There is no political or economic mandate for creating the NAU, and unofficial polls of a cross-section of Americans indicate that they are overwhelmingly against this end-run around national sovereignty.

To answer Lou Dobbs, "No, the political elites have not gone mad", they just want you to think that they have.

The reality over appearance is easily cleared up with a proper historical perspective of the last 35 years of political and economic manipulation by the same elite who now bring us the NAU.

This paper will explore this history in order to give the reader a complete picture of the NAU, how it is made possible, who are the instigators of it, and where it is headed.

It is important to first understand that the impending birth of the NAU is a gestation of the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, not the Congress. This is the topic of the first discussion below.

The next topic will examine the global elite's strategy of subverting the power to negotiate trade treaties and international law with foreign countries from the Congress to the President. Without this power, NAFTA and the NAU would never have been possible.

After this, we will show that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is the immediate genetic and necessary ancestor of the NAU.

Lastly, throughout this report the NAU perpetrators and their tactics will be brought into the limelight so as to affix blame where it properly belongs. The reader will be struck with the fact that the same people are at the center of each of these subjects.

The Best Government that Money Can Buy

Modern day globalization was launched with the creation of the Trilateral Commission in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Its membership consisted of just over 300 powerful elitists from north America, Europe and Japan. The clearly stated goal of the Trilateral Commission was to foster a "New International Economic Order" that would supplant the historical economic order.

In spite of its non-political rhetoric, The Trilateral Commission nonetheless established a headlock on the Executive Branch of the U.S. government with the election of James Earl Carter in 1976. Hand-picked as a presidential candidate by Brzezinski, Carter was personally tutored in globalist philosophy and foreign policy by Brzezinski himself. Subsequently, when Carter was sworn in as President, he appointed no less than one-third of the U.S. members of the Commission to his Cabinet and other high-level posts in his Administration. Such was the genesis of the Trilateral Commission's domination of the Executive Branch that continues to the present day.

With the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, Trilateral Commission member George H.W. Bush was introduced to the White House as vice-president. Through Bush's influence, Reagan continued to select key appointments from the ranks of the Trilateral Commission.

In 1988, George H.W. Bush began his four-year term as President. He was followed by fellow Trilateral Commission member William Jefferson Clinton, who served for 8 years as President and appointed fourteen fellow Trilateral members to his Administration.

The election of George W. Bush in 2000 should be no surprise. Although Bush was not a member of the Trilateral Commission, his vice-president Dick Cheney is. In addition, Dick Cheney's wife, Lynne, is also a member of the Commission in her own right.

The hegemony of the Trilateral Commission over the Executive Branch of the U.S. government is unmistakable. Critics argue that this scenario is merely circumstantial, that the most qualified political "talent" quite naturally tends to belong to groups like the Trilateral Commission in the first place. Under examination, such explanations are quite hollow.

Why would the Trilateral Commission seek to dominate the Executive Branch? Quite simply - Power! That is, power to get things done directly which would have been impossible to accomplish through the only moderately successful lobbying efforts of the past; power to use the government as a bully platform to modify political behavior throughout the world.

Of course, the obvious corollary to this hegemony is that the influence and impact of the citizenry is virtually eliminated.

Continue to read:
http://www.augustreview.com/index.php?modu...id=4&pid=14

[wokensheep]

brilliant my ass!

[tsoldrin]

This north american union, as usual, was discussed by Lou Dobbs tonight. He had a poll at loudobbs.com and I think 96% of the people said they were outraged by this. Someone should throw a leash on Alex Jones to keep him on topic and put him on Lou's show.

[wokensheep]

http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/27...clude.html

[faceless]

I'd guess the best reason to have such a union is to spread the blame. I can't see Canada or Mexico being that interested though.

[wokensheep]

no the best reason is to take your rights, and then join with the EU and create world gov.

[Conspiracy Dave]

Quote:I'd guess the best reason to have such a union is to spread the blame. I can't see Canada or Mexico being that interested though.

No no, I can see Mexico being very interested.

But why the hell would Canada want to unite economically and currency wise with the United States and Mexico...like fucking ouch.

Ohh yay, now we can give all of our oilsands away even more, I guess 60% wasn't enough.

I think Canada is the only country in North America left worth saving, were still able to be running strong if it wasn't for the US's sphere of influence sucking us dry energy wise and economically.

If the United states collapsed from the debt bubble, I wonder if Canada would be able to to realign all their business and industry interests to the asian and Europian markets? Would be a pretty hard transition in the face of our major economic trade partner collapsing, I dont know if we'd make it.

If we go fully into the North American union and get stuck on the same fucking currency as USA and Sewage land then we are fucked if there's ever an economic collapse even more so than we would be now.