A Bond For All The Ages

[leo]

Leo Lyon Zagami

presents

A Bond for All the Ages :

Sir Francis Bacon and John Dee : the Original
illuminati 007

The friendship between John Dee and Walsingham chief
officer of Queen Elisabeth was a very special one
indeed, as these two were working for Elisabeth's
Intelligence Service. The intelligence comunity of the
British illuminati yesterday as today still use the
espionage tecnique's of illustrius illuminati John
Dee the first agent in history to use 007 as his
personal cypher. Dee was the man whom Ian Fleming
modeled his 007 James Bond character on, the first and
perhaps the best secret agent of the crown.

John Dee was the creator of the e MONAS HIEROGLYPHICA
('THE HIEROGLYPHIC MONAD')

This is John Dee's illuminati treatise on symbolic
language. Although published in 1564 at age 37, he
considered it valuable throughout his life. The Monas
is a highly esoteric work. In it he claims himself in
possession of the most secret mysteries of the true
illuminati . He wrote it in twelve days while
apparently in a peak (mystical) state: “[I am] the pen
merely of [God] Whose Spirit, quickly writing these
things through me, I wish and I hope to be.” He
claimed it will revolutionize mankind :

MONAS HIEROGLYPHICA

('THE HIEROGLYPHIC MONAD')

by Dr. JOHN DEE

Antwerp, 1564.

Translated by J.W. Hamilton-Jones, 1947 its something
the western illuminati seem to love very much as John
Dee stated "Here the vulgar eye will see nothing but
Obscurity and will despair considerably "..
so the illuminati are free to practice in secret the
Royal Art of Alchemy while the sheep dont care as
usual and live of football.

In 1582 John Dee (1527-1608) met a younger man,the
dubius Edward Kelley,a kind of Elizabethan Michael
Holligshead.Kelley had a reputation as a mountebank
and occult charlatan who made a living selling quack
alchemical concoctions; tradition holds that he had
his ears cut off for forgery and went about with a
skullcap to hide the fact. With Kelley acting as
'scryer' -seer- Dee sought to communicate with spirits
and basicly know the mind of God. By doing so these
two were ending in the hands of Jinns who
communicated using a 'shewstone' one of which,a
crystal ball, can be seen today at the British Museum
(when the British Intelligence is not using it
obviously). Kelley 'saw' the angels Annael ,Uriel, and
others , including the strange spirit girl, Madimi
clearly a Jinn . These Sessions are accompanied still
nowdays by the sounds of thunder,blaring trumpets, and
a kind of roaring.

'The Angels' or Jinn to be more accurate communicated
their knowledge to Kelley by pointing to the letters
of a strage language , which Dee called Enochian,
refering to Enoch of the Old Testament, who spoke with
God. Dee wrote down the letters as Kelley called them
out. The atmosphere of the spirit world Kelley saw has
almost a gothic feel to it , he spoke of the four
Watchtowers,cubes of infinite dimensions,the Calls of
the Aethyers, and the qliphothic demons that the true
mage must learn to command.A confidence man and
swindler,Kelley was not above using his position with
the Jinns to his personal advantage as it often
happens with the illuminati.Not suprisingly A.Crowley
wrote he was also the reincarnation of Kelley and
recordings of Crowley's Calls of the Aethyers are
commercialy available around the internet on cd's
for those of you who like it a bit dark and definetely
very spooky...Aum..Aum...

Dr. Dee's learning was far and wide, a brilliant
mathematician, whose study ranged from geo-cartography
and calculus which was vital in navigating the New
World for explorers, to astrology, alchemy, the
Cabala, cypher writing, religion, architecture, and
science. In short, Dee's metaphysics were a 'red'
cross of the Hermetic tradition with a strong dose of
mathematics. His library at the riverside village of
Mortlake was considered the finest private collection
in Europe containing thousands of bound books and
handwritten manuscripts devoted to philosophy, science
and esoterica. In comparison the University of
Cambridge at the time had a mere 451 total books and
manuscripts in their possession.

Noel Fermor in the journal Baconiana wrote that, "The
Earl of Leicester's father, the Duke of Northmberland,
employed Dee as a tutor to his children so that they
would have a sound scientific upbringing.
Northumberland became a notable scientist with a
strong leaning toward mathematics and magnetism.
Anthony Wood in his Athenae Oxoniensis, wrote "that no
one knew Robert Dudley better than Dee." So it was
quite natural for Leicester to introduce Dee to
Elizabeth as she was to become the new Queen and it
wasn't long before Dee advanced to become the court
astrologer.


(Leicester signed his letters to Elizabeth with two
circles containing dots symbolising he was her "Eyes")

Elizabeth was very much interested in the occult. Dee
was responsible for choosing the most auspicious date
for Elizabeth's coronation which was on January 15th,
1559. The Queen was so impressed by Dee that she
eventually travelled with her court to Mortlake, for
the purpose of seeing his great library.

Dee has been defamed through the centuries as a
necromancer, but it's the opinion of many writers that
his angelic-cabalistic- alchemical work, his
Philosophers Stone, the"Monad Hieroglyphica"(1564) may
have been a cover for covert operations carried on in
the name of her majesty. The 007 was the insignia
number that Elizabeth was to use for private
communiques between her Court and Dee.


Dee signed his letters with two circles symbolising
his own two eyes and indicating that he was the secret
eyes of the Queen.The two circles are guarded by what
may be considered a square root sign or an elongated
seven. For Dee, seven was a sacred cabbalistic and
lucky number.(Richard Deacon)

When the Spanish Armada loomed over the English
Channel it was Dee as the wise sage who suggested to
hold the course and be still. He had correctly
anticipated that devastating storms would destroy the
mighty Spanish Fleet and that it would be best to keep
the English ships at bay. Some have suggested that it
was Dee himself who conjured up that storm. Whatever
it was that allowed England to defeat the Armada, John
Dee was having his finest patriotic moment. One can
see why some commentators have Dee associated with
being the inspiration for the protagonist Prospero (to
hope for the future) from The Tempest. Francis Yates
in her seminal exploration Majesty and Magic in
Shakespeare's Last Plays, comments, "Dare one say that
the German Rosicrucian movement reaches a peak of
poetic expression in The Tempest, a Rosicrucian
manifesto infused with the spirit of Dee, using
theatrical parables for esoteric communication?"

Dee's wisdom of nature even extended into the field of
architecture where Francis Yates in The Theatre of the
World states that James Burbage consulted Dee on the
design of the first theater. Later,"The Globe was
created, says Yates, because in the Burbage tradition
the design was to amplify naturally the voices of the
plyers." This was accomplished by the geometrical
resonance of the circled dome. Burbage relied on Dee's
extensive architectural library for this construction.

Little has come down to us in terms of records of
Francis Bacon and John Dee knowing each other but on
the afternoon of August 11, 1582 there was an entry in
Dee's journal that they met at Mortlake. Bacon was 21
years old at the time and was accompanied by a Mr.
Phillipes, a top cryptographer in the employ of Sir
Francis Walsingham who headed up the early days of
England's secret service. They were there according to
Ewen MacDuff, in an article, "After Some Time Be Past"
in 'Baconiana', (Dec.1983)" to find out the truth
about the ancient Hebrew art of the Gematria- one of
the oldest cipher systems known, dating from 700 B.C.
They were seeking to discuss this with Dee because he
was not only one of the leading adepts of this field,
but a regular practitioner in certain levels of
Gematria." Also, David Kahn in The Codebreakers
suggests that because of Dee's great interest in the
13th century alchemist Roger Bacon, that he may have
introduced Bacon to the works of Roger Bacon,"which
may help explain the similarities in their thought."

The Precarious Politics of Hermetic Tradition in the
King James Reign

There is no doubt of John Dee's ubiquitous influence
during the Elizabethan age. When James became King,
Dee's ideas on magic were no longer appreciated. James
unfavorable and fearful attitude toward the occult was
the opposite of Elizabeth's. Bacon became well aware
that it was necessary to be very careful while
advancing his scientific ideas to James and that any
trace of Dee's weird angelic-alchemical study could
jeopardize his own projects from taking hold. Bacon's
observation of the mis-treatment bestowed upon Dee by
James served to reinforce that it was a different era
and that the need to practice that Shakespeare maxim,
"Discretion is the better part of valor" was
imperative to anyone with a sweet disposition toward
magic and mathematics or a secret society. Dee was
even derided in the Ben Jonson play The Alchemist
perhaps to placate James, yet another signal that this
was an end of the liberal Elizabethan attitude toward
Hermeticism. So it's not surprising that Bacon chose
to hold back his Rosicrucian utopia The New Atlantis
from publication until after his death as it portrayed
a future world in which man could co-exist with his
fellow man without the divine right of kings and the
new tools that the magic of science would one day
bring could also be in harmony with nature as well.
But it was Dee's colonization dream many years before
who referred to the new world as "Atlantis." He would
have been proud to have read Bacon's New Atlantis and
seen Bacon's sympathetic portrayal of him as the
magician Prospero, of The Tempest.

Francis Yates in The Rosicrucian Enlightenment
suggests that," in Bacon's writings there is nowhere
to be found any mention of Dee or his famous Monas
Hierglyphica. Yates makes a further point by saying
that, "It is a well known objection to Bacon's claim
to be an important figure in the history of science
that he did not place sufficient emphasis on the
all-important mathematical sciences in his programme
for the advancement of learning, and that he ignored
these sciences by his rejection of the Copernican
theory and of William Gilbert's theory of the magnet.
Bacon's avoidance of mathematics and Copernican theory
might have been because he regarded mathematics as too
closely associated with Dee and his 'conjuring' and
Copernicus as to closely associated with Bruno and his
extreme Egyptian and magical religion. This hypothesis
is now worth recalling because it suggests a possible
reason for a major difference between German
Rosicrucianism and Baconianism. In the former Dee and
his mathematics are not feared, but Bacon avoids them;
in the former Bruno is an influence but is rejected by
Bacon. In both cases Bacon may have been evading what
seemed to him dangerous subjects in order to protect
his projects from witch hunters, from the cry of
'sorcery' which as Naude' said, "could pursue a
mathematician in the early 17th century."

It should be remembered that Bacon had a cautious and
scientific approach to mathematics along with his
great interest in cyphers.

Peter Dawkins in his book "Francis Bacon Herald of the
New Age" would strongly disagree with Yates on Bacon's
avoidance of mathematics. He writes, "nothing could be
further from the truth: for number is a cypher and
geometry a symbol for truth, and Francis Bacon was
intensely interested in and a master of cipher and
symbol, and of rhythm in language, using them
repeatedly throughout all his works in various cryptic
ways--for he saw mathematics as a vitally important
occult or mystical science, and used it accordingly.
Mathematics coupled with analogy and allegory,
constitute a principal means to the discovery of what
Bacon has enticingly hidden." Dawkins later emphasizes
that, "Francis Bacon considered mathematics to be a
branch of metaphysics, capable of giving insights into
the highest 'Forms' or archetypes--the laws and
intelligences of the universe. Consequently, like Dr.
John Dee, his early tutor, he was fascinated by
mathematical cypher in both its numeric and geometric
forms, and with its magical use. Bacon gives both
mathematics and analogy which he considers a science
and calls "grammatical philosophy," a high place in
his Great Instauration; which, when used together help
to unlock the doors to that which Bacon has
deliberately concealed-- including certain mysteries
hidden in the Shakespeare plays. For instance, the two
great books published in 1623 were the Shakespeare's
Folio Comedies, Histories & Tragedies and Bacon's De
Augmentis Scientiarum{the philosophical background and
purpose of the Shakespeare plays} two masterpieces
published together, since they are as twins, each
being a key to unlock hidden treasures in the other--
two relating to the twin faculties of the
mind--imagination and reason--and both drawing upon
the third faculty, memory." It should be noted that
the following year 1624 the cypher book,
Cryptomenytices was published and Dawkins points to
this as "providing the cipher keys to open the 'crypt'
of Rosicrucian wisdom hidden in both the philosophical
and the poetical works of art of this great Master."

Yates admits to being a Stratfordian and of course
does not realize the extent of Bacon's wisdom in
protecting himself from censorship. She says, "We
begin to understand that The Tempest was a very bold
manifesto, and that Shakespeare was braver than
Bacon."

If Yates could only glimpse how ahead of the game
Bacon was she could only burst out and laugh at
herself for writing this. But she is not the first
modern day Shakespeare critic to underestimate Francis
Bacon's foresight to write under a mighty pen-name and
steer his Secret Free-Masonry-Group at the same time.
It's like asking was Twain braver than Clemens? The
absurd logic of this could be solved if Stratfordians
applied the Baconian method (inductive logic with
trial and error) into the Shakespeare Authorship. Go
one step further using this method of inquiry to cross
reference a lost connection missing between the
Rosicrucian literature of The Fama and the Confessio,
The Chemical Marriage of Christian Rosenkrantz, The
New Atlantis, The Tempest, with The King James Version
of the Bible, The Advancement of Learning and Dee's
Monad Hieroglyphic. Somewhere there lies a common
thread, a code, meant for those who would cross
reference all these words. Perhaps when the code is
broken we will have the equivalent of Prospero's
buried staff and recognize the impact of Dee and
Bacon's relationship with their dedication to the
enlightenment of all.

What Bacon learned from Dee outside of the importance
of cyphers was not to have one's political and
esoteric-artistic identity defined exclusively by the
outside world. There was inner power for Bacon that no
matter what happened to him he could still sacrifice
his name, bury his staff like Prospero and wield a
protective persona to express his artistic views for
himself and his secret group of "Good Pens." This is
responsible wisdom in action as a response to
difficult political pressures. For Bacon due to the
out of the ordinary set of circumstances surrounding
his birth this pressure became a discipline for him
(all his life) to maintain and remember that old
saying, "keep your friends close and your enemies
closer." Bacon knew from first hand experience when he
said, as Shakespeare, "sweet are the uses of
adversity."

Manly P. Hall had a book, Orders of Universal
Reformation in which a woodcut from 1655 by Jacob
Cats, shows an emblem of an ancient man bearing
likeness to John Dee, passing the lamp of tradition
over an open grave to a young man with an
extravagantly large rose on his shoe buckle. In
Bacon's sixth book of the Advancement of Learning he
defines his method as, Traditionem Lampadis, the
delivery of the lamp.

Mrs. Henry Pott writes in "Francis Bacon and His
Secret Society,"The organization or method of
transmission he (Bacon) established was such as to
ensure that never again so long as the world endured,
should the lamp of tradition, the light of truth, be
darkened or extinguished."

In closing a comment from Noel Fermor from

Baconiana 1981 "After all, in John Dee we have a man
who had a profound influence on Renaissance thought
and on the deep laid schemes of Francis Bacon for the
betterment of mankind. Dee wrote, "Farewell, diligent
reader; in reading these things, invocate the spirit
of Eternal Light, speak little, meditate much and
judge aright."

[watcherof]

:007:

:zzz::zzz::zzz:

[tkra]

Hey mason, they gave you an apron and marched you around the lodge room 'till you got dizzy. Getting suited up with the "big boys" for some fancy dancing qualifies you as instantly "intelligent" without having to do any thinking. The costumes and theater have made you smart and don't it feel great?

WOW! Just think what you could do if I gave you a Bat-Belt. I bet you could climb skyscrapers.

Hmm...how about a cape? Will it make you fly?



Forgive Leo's common sense for threatening the instant instant power trip masonic theatrics have given you, but he's correct about what he says. But then again, maybe if you REALLY sell out and impress your masters they'll let you ride in the batmobile.

[watcherof]

great photo, is that the shortest policeman in the Met'??

as for your post:

well i didn't get dizzy and had to buy my apron!
I dont get suited and go dancing, I prefer jeans and a shirt and a few beers in my local.
Was already a member of Mensa so no great leaps in intelligence, the "costume" has not made me smarter but the open university is doing a good job!

Thanks for the offer of a bat-belt but I have my fancy dress sorted for new years eve.

No power trips for me at Lodge yet, so far its washing the tea cups and selling the raffle tickets!!

[tkra]

It would be nice if there was a healthy club around one could attend. I understand that. The simple problem with the entire fraternal circuit is that it's full of grift. That's why I can't stand any of it.

The planet is greed infected, but to the point where it has all become "normal" to most people, and they are oblivious to the side effects. It's a mad cash grab and common sense has been thrown away. I suspect the death of television will balance the playing field. 50 strong years of garbage and propaganda have done plenty of damage but that is ending now.

As for the rest of it, I support what Leo is doing, because it has to get done. The flak he has been taking from dorks is embarrassing to the rest of us. I don't know if the guys on his case are egotistical little peckerheads trying to prove they're smart, or if lodge daddy wants to smear Leo. In either case this is a conspiracy board where we are investigating the crimes of the global frat boys... not defending them.

The thread circulating that Leo may be "crazy" or not a "real" illuminoid is particularly pathetic. Leo's message, and what I talk about is that the My$tery $chool$ are degenerate scam pits that should be AVOIDED, and not worshipped. There are guys on this board wondering if he's really a "real" ex-mason we should trust or a faker. The whole point of what he has been saying is that the entire fraternal system is filled with fraud artists. That's why he defected and left.

So was he a "real" member of a scam cult he got sick of, or is he fake? It's A SCAM CULT!!! Grow up. The idiots are still running around looking for the official illuminati so they can worship in fear and awe. They want the "official" explanation and there isn't one. Greasy old men making sleazy business deals. That's the illuminati. Regular rank and file masons know this, although they probably don't want to admit it. As I said, it's nice to have a clubhouse and something to believe in... but the global cult of money love is currently way out of control.

Leo says he has quit FRAUD and has gone back to serious religion and study. Was he really a real member of the big boys club, or can we find something he has typed to "discredit" him? Was he a real member of a bad organization who now advocates morality, or was he a fake member of a bad organization now advocating morality?

I think the conspiracy dorks are desperately trying to find the supposed demon masters ruling us all so they can grovel and worship at the altar of mammon... or at least fear it. What I talk about, and what Leo has talked about is to STOP BEING A BUNCH OF MONEY GRUBBING FOOLS. The mystery schools are mind control scams being run by money, sex, drug addicted degenerates.

Now does anyone get the message, or are they looking for the OFFICIAL headquarters of money, sex, drug addiction and scams? I am sick of all the dorks who are desperately searching for demon masters to lead them all the way to stupidland.

And Satan said unto Jesus: "All these kingdoms full of dorks, hookers, idiots and pinheads can be yours. Own them and rule them. You will be their master and they will look up to you. You can have it all."

Uh, the idea is to maintain genuine morality in the world so we stay civilized. Do you really want to OWN the planet of the stinking apes? Uh, I for one will pass.


Thanks to Leo for staying at it. It's a thankless job, but if we let CULTS rule the world any more than they already are, we're finished.