Military experiments on civilians?

[JazzRoc]

Priypjat:

Again, that may wellbe so but what I was talking about were 'friendly' 'rogue' intel 'pockets' within the Anglo-American bloc.. such as those that prevented a war with Iran from already having had kicked off, like I speculated from available evidence.
Here I defer to your longer reading of it.

I was awarded a book for a synchronistic poem I once wrote by the head of the Catholic Church in the the British Isles..he seemed a bit preoccupied and creepy..met some hired thugs for oil companies in the Pacific and some influential freemasonic politicians and a no longer contact maintained freemasonic police relative who worked on the Peter Sutcliffe case in an overseeing capacity... I don't think it matters how high up the pyramid you might have encountered someone, in terms of facing the outlandish but TRUE and SHOCKING reality that it's actually a little joke and how could you not see it? You've been wearing chains for hundreds of years at least, not our fault you're thick as pig shit?
To be free you have to pay for it. There is a choice of ways to do this. You could flip a coin.

That's not the point... look at how it pragmatically manifests and would do in any overarching bureaucracy... you want that?? I know you like to toy with contrariness here... and why not?... but come on, JR. LOOK AT THE ABUSE ENABLED by that policy in China. It's truly staggering and if you do advocate it without attention then you are an exemplification of the reality of 'the banality of evil'... I don't think you are 'evil', I'm just talking specifically about the banality of evil as an/the IMPORTANT concept.
Yes it's always banal. I can't see how it's possible to alter China's internal policy except by entering it, where you'll have a Planck-sized force. Outside it, where you have no power, you have no evil.

you get your kids enthused into being sterilised with smiling optimism and then get back to me
If you asked them they'd tell you that they would have explain more than two.

And then the bird flu...please do something to assure me that you are not totally jaded now.. it's right in front of your face, T.. just give yourself a bit of a shake and reappraise without the subjective blinding anti-slant. Let chemtrails and Hovind go for a bit, come deeper and allow a virtual open mind in your head to explore the evidence about who owns you..why not? "you only live once":).. pls. view as general CT pro-human warmth.
The nature of epidemics you won't understand, as they involve evolutionary arguments. I side with science. The main motivation of most scientists is quite apolitical and anarchistic.

i do research believe it or not... but I'm autistic, so it might manifest differently... either way, I appreciate your approach but please widen the parameters of what you will consider a little.. eg. the mystery babylon aspect has MUCH to it, information of which doesn't in anyway permeate from religiosity.
Nobody is strong enough by themselves. The more viewpoints the better. Even if the factuality is somewhat short of truth there is something to be said for the esoteric, for we each contain it, and aspects of it will be revealed in our perceptions.

You might think I am mad but I used to practise magic... sometimes it seemed to work actually... beyond what might appear ordinary chance... maybe it was a case of random coin flipping comes goo but I don't think so.
That's about the biggest plea for the legitimization of confirmation bias...

You should see the freedom I have to explore REALITY by NOT being a scientist.
You are exploring something, but it isn't reality. If you were exploring reality you could formulate a theory, make a prediction, and run an experiment and test the results. That's what reality is: something you can get hold of.

As I already said long ago, if you really want to know how things are from an example look into the UN monarchical intel service provided child meat for ancient ritual ring that 'suffered' limited exposure in Belgium... you said you are not interested in that... and I thought, 'well, if you can't look it, how can you make any of these general comments beyond what you know?
I don't profess to know much about socio- and psychopathology. It's a matter of taste. I have read of the murders of thousands of people (with details) and millions of others (without so much detail) and I don't have the taste for any more.
Most of the comments I've been making have been along two channels:- a) technical claims which aren't possible b ) employment experience (of how other people behave) in sixty-five separate workplaces.

I'm not intending any hint of arrogance obviously...but just take a look..it isn't nice that so many children disappear every year and there's no why or where they go. A lot of them go to rituals, get used to it and don't guffaw because that is the world you live in. Do you really think that I am so intellectually incompetent as to make such outlandish claims if I did not know it to be so?... I said I thought it was a missile because of the testimony of a different plane...you made me look again and see that a 757 did go into the pentagon..or something very like one, anyhow...and I revised my statement..without any burgeoning humility...I have stood by the idea that children are being farmed and abducted for ritual for many years because I know it to be true...care to have a moment devoid of scorn to appreciate this and perhaps look for yourself.
I haven't suggested you were arrogant. Why crime happens is mysterious to me. The way I see it, if you adopt it the REAL problem with it is the way you're going to wake up the next day (and so forth) with full knowledge of it. Only amnesia might save you.

Of course, all other from the 200,000 that die needlessly every day from being ripped off by the global village.
I know. We don't seem to be able to lift a finger.

Your mockery of utilitarianism stinks to high heaven. Suck Glaxo Smith Kline's fetid penis and don't trouble me with such nonsense. You are SUPPOSED to be my elder and better in this 4D illusion..to put it Ickeingly.
I AM a utilitarian. A pragmatic one.

it IS the new super vogue that everyone's cheming up for, 'Dummkopf':)huhu you feel it too even in your hideaway..and it certainly isn't what Al Gore is corping on about... nice play on words.
I'm not that dumm. In a world of diminishing REAL resources it ISN'T the producers that win. Your idea might work with diamonds, but it won't work with oil.

They are more probably coinciding with each other.. if you and yours are in Former East Germany and in need of a tent, I will endeavour to sort you out.
If it's the other way you're welcome here.:)

No, they are VERY powerful. Pls see current quote in my signature. I am of the conviction that although the poor or rich want to hang onto the status quo in dumb fear of freedom, the actual poor have been gearing up for a while now.. we look to the Chinese population for solidarity... but it is so difficult now the one child policy has dictated sucha macho frustrated phenomena with so few women daring to speak up... and that's coming from someone who doesn't think everything H:makow says about the co-option of the women's rights movement as early as the late 19th century is total bunk... though i do think some of it is. Sorry Henry..illuminati is an excellently provocative and thoughtful book..I hope some concerners buy it. He's Jewish but it is a very critical book of the Judaic cult, JR..It might be too much for you in that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between valid and deep socio-political insight and sheer frustrated release of pressure...ie there is stuff in that book about the 'jews did do it' theory that IS pertinent should you ever want to fully get into the water and not rail crap asunder in our general direction as 'conspiracy theorists', when we know you haven't done your homework in many areas...we are multi-disciplinary and just because we are open to consider wild prospects and look at them openly doesn't mean we are actually up the wrong creek... you are still here, after all.
I'm not jewish. I'm anti-Zionist but not anti-jew. I think there WAS a holocaust. We should protect our diversity because it is a great treasure. That makes me pro-everyone and anti war disease and death.

Including attacking 14 year old children and vocally ripping into their computed generated map using NASA software that concluded that the Earth would NOT get hit by Apophis in 2039 as completely irrelevant when clearly the 14year old is a potential genius... apparently we are supposed to imagine that the comet probably WILL hit Earth if you follow the NASA propaganda. check it out. It's not a 'snippet' even though it may not have made the bars in Spain.
I still haven't checked this yet. sorry.

either specialise in what you know and stick to it like you opine is your purpose here or RTFM on the other stuff before making comment...it's a suggestion not an egoistic decree.
Well I'm still learning. I like a broad base to my experience too. Thanks for the pleasant banter. I've had a litre of 5.5% Dorada beer which is enough to relax me out...

I was thinking more in terms of the life extension breakthroughs for the formidably rich.
Hmmm. I can imagine many scenarios where virtual immortality is more a curse than a blessing. It might be great if it happens to you in a burgeoning society. But say it takes place in a sterile society?

It's not a reason to purposefully fuck them up though, is it?
That's true in the present instance. All morality and ethics adheres to a relative standard (if at all pragmatic and practical): there are many scenarios which could constrain morality this way or that. What's right for one time may not be so later.

They you don't know jackshit about how it seemingly works... no offence intended... forgive it if the post is a bit disorientated, special day... had a couple of drinks... I might have meandered into a ramble, to an extent.
That's the way I like it.:)