Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

yeti · 02-27-2007, 12:49 AM

Quote:
Quote:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=14...=9%2F11#14m44ss
this video has been removed....
Yup its gone, anyone have it on tracker

It doesn't say it's gone. It says this:

Quote:We're sorry, but this video may not be available.
Try refreshing the page to see this video.

As I said before, it's been doing this off and on all day. It'll pop up again eventually.

~~MrBS~~ · 02-27-2007, 01:27 AM

Quote:that what you get?

Yeah :crazy:. Also here there's some CPU overuse errors sometimes - but I guess that's to be expected given the circumstances.

ONYOUR(6) · 02-27-2007, 08:46 AM

Boys' and Girls' I got this from the caller who put it up on the Alex Jones call in. you will have to type this in google video area to get it to work now. type building 7 bbc. dont for get to space:)

Typhoid · 02-27-2007, 01:34 PM

We should get a crew together in the UK with a camcorder and go DOWN to BBS with a laptop+video and show it to these people and get it on film. Calling them doesnt work and apparently neither does emailing them.

Its time to pull some AJ shit.

- typhoid

hystericol · (This post was last modified: 02-27-2007 02:35 PM by hystericol.)

Click this LINK and you'll get the 183 mb avi from google.
Just save it wherever you choose

Fixation · 02-27-2007, 07:46 PM

BBC's response -

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007...conspiracy.html

Pretty typical.

slothy · 02-28-2007, 12:26 AM

Thanks for that Fixation, it boggles the mind that this could be an error, it's a bit of a coincidence if it was.

Was the film 'The Medusa Touch' inspired by BBC news? I hope they don't report anything bad about me!

~~byrd~~ · 02-28-2007, 01:56 AM

yea but...how could it be an error? that is such a ridiculous explanation. what, she just happened to guess, or mistakenly hear, or get the wrong building number.... know what i mean? how is it possible to 'mistake' something like this? please someone explain what their idea of 'error' is? she said the building had collapsed, and right behind her the building was standing. it was 5:00, and the building didnt come down till 5:25 or so. the guy she was talkin to back in the UK saw it. he must have noticed the building shes referring to is right there behind her!! im surprised they didnt cut her off right then.

and if this video wasnt enough, then the response given by BBC should put ya over the top. another case of lost tapes. give me a break. it was an error, and also, we lost the tapes. well the clip with the original time stamps on it is floatin around. theres no way to get out of this.

if anyone has friends out there who you still argue with and who just cant seem to let their brains accept this shit...heres the chance you've been waiting for. this is as blatant as it gets.

~~byrd~~ · 02-28-2007, 03:01 AM

check this clip out. its an audio file of someone calling the office of that reporter. pretty funny shit.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/psu4kd

i smell a canadian :wink:

~~byrd~~ · 02-28-2007, 03:04 AM

i like this comment the best so far.....

Quote:"We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy)."

How convenient!!! So of course when you DO get hold of the footage, you can say "well this is not original footage so it's not reliable!" How utterly unpredictable. The very fact that you claim not to have the archive footage (which I'm sure you're required to keep for various legal reasons) is enough to prove that in fact the British Brainwashing Corporation IS in fact part of a conspiracy.

Incidentally, as much as you'd like people to think otherwise, "conspiracy" is not a dirty word. The government conspired to convince us there were WMD in Iraq - which as you know there weren't. Conspiracy is an integral part of politics, and nothing would happen without it.

But you're obviously missing the point. If you had reported the building as having collapsed before it did so, it in fact DOES prove you were part of a conspiracy - for there is NO EARTHLY WAY anyone, not least the BBC, could have known that WTC7 was going to collapse. It had been hit by nothing, and there was no significant damage. And yet you knew it was going to collapse, and even WHY it collapsed - before it even did!!! Sorry, but your quoting some naysayer from Youtube is as weak an explanation as it is possible to give.

You are the weakest link. Goodbye!!

LeveL · 02-28-2007, 03:19 AM

Quote:I believe it is possible, if not more likely, that BBC made a mistake.

You're playing devils advocate? I hope so because there's no defending the BBC.

I guess it was a "mistake" how Google Video removed this video twice,
despite the fact that they leave hundreds of thousands of copyrighted
music videos up on their website?

I guess it was a "mistake" how YouTube removed this video, despite
the fact that they leave hundreds of thousands of copyrighted music
videos up on their website?

I guess it was a "mistake" how Demonoid.com removed this video,
despite the fact that they leave tens of thousands of torrents there
of copyrighted software, movies, albums, games and ebooks on
their website?

Yes folks its ALL just a coincidence that this damning video gets
removed from three places where nothing else gets removed.

You know it is not even this BBC footage that makes you think twice
about things, it is when you see them scrambling to remove it and it
also gets removed from the archive it came from, then you know for
absolutely certain its a cover up.

Too late though for the f**king bastards that remove these things,
too f**king late this time you f**king wretched twisted cowards!
F**k you all - this video is out there now, what are you going to
do, format everyones computer that has this video on it? You are
the appitimy of everything that is wrong with the world, you absolute
bastards! You didn't make it work out this time, for once, people know
about this now.

slothy · 02-28-2007, 03:42 AM

Demonoid too eh? Well I just upped it there myself, we'll have to take turns!;)

~~byrd~~ · 02-28-2007, 04:16 AM

this may be the defining moment.

WeThePeople · 02-28-2007, 11:30 AM

Get it while it's hot! Direct dowload:

<span style="color:red">911 WTC7 23 Minute Warning.avi

Note: PLEASE save to disk instead of trying to view this in your browser.

It will be interesting to see if my ISP shuts down my web server. If so, and I'm still breathing, I'll let everyone know what happened. This AVI has much better audio than the others I've seen. I had to run the file I downloaded via Bittorrent through VirtualDub in order to be able to hear the soundtrack, but this AVI file seems to play fine with any video player I've tried.

Typhoid · 02-28-2007, 12:10 PM

Quote:
Quote:I believe it is possible, if not more likely, that BBC made a mistake.
I guess it was a "mistake" how Google Video removed this video twice,
despite the fact that they leave hundreds of thousands of copyrighted
music videos up on their website?

I guess it was a "mistake" how YouTube removed this video, despite
the fact that they leave hundreds of thousands of copyrighted music
videos up on their website?

I guess it was a "mistake" how Demonoid.com removed this video,
despite the fact that they leave tens of thousands of torrents there
of copyrighted software, movies, albums, games and ebooks on
their website?

Yes folks its ALL just a coincidence that this damning video gets
removed from three places where nothing else gets removed.

....

You know, sometimes we conspiracy theorists get a rap for jumping to outrageous conclusions without looking at the alternative side of the story.

If you notice, when I said that it was the first reply to the thread. All I wanted to do was say that there is an alternative way to think instead of everyone just jumping right to a BBC cover-up. I do agree, due to more recent events, that there is something a bit more here than meets the eye.

I NEVER said that it was a 'mistake' that this video was removed, I said that there is evidence showing that it COULD have been a mistake. Take a look at some of the evidence against a cover-up, shall we? :::

(1) It was September 11, 2001. Shit was hitting the fan, and people were scared. There was mass confusion, specially among reporters. A mistake could have easily been made.

(2) It was the BBC, a foreign newspaper on American soil on the most confused and defining day of North America. This adds to the chance of a mistake happening in regards to reporters.

(3) Again, because they were the BBC, they may not have known the ins-and-outs of the buildings. FOr instance, parts of the Marriot hotel collapsed that was next to the towers. It could have easily been a mistake, they have the name of another WTC tower, and they heard a building next to the twin towers collapsed. They put two and two together?

(4) Final point, and one most people seem to forget. THE BBC, ASWELL AS ALL NEWS REPORTERS ON THAT DAY, DID NOT GO OUT AND INVESTIGATE! THEY QUOTE THE NEWS THAT PEOPLE ON THE STREET SAY, AND REPORT IT! If there was any conspiracy, a government informant could have easily said that the building fell because of debris and damage, believing that there would be a wait time from the moment he told them to the moment the news reporter said it live. Just because they report something that is incorrect, doesn't mean that they were the ones to go out and say it first.

I am the first to admit, and believe, that there is something more to what the BBC is saying. I do not believe that they are innocent in this story, but all I did 'LeveL' is present the alternative side to what is constantly being said by people.

- typhoid