The Sura 4:82 Challenge To All Muslims.

[Starjade]

In the first instance this tale of the Rabbi called Zacharias can not be established as being true for many reasons. The tale itself states that ole Zacharias was alone in the Temple and the crowd that was outside were not a witness to the events claimed to have occurred in the Temple. Ole Zacharias was claimed to be smitten dumb and had left the scene unable to say what went on in the Temple. It was claimed by this character Luke that it was perceived by the crowd that he had seen this vision that Luke the disciple of Jesus had explained in detail as he narrated this story. And Luke himself was not a witness to that event in that Temple and so it was also not possible for anyone to know in any detail what had happened in the Temple. It is all only a hearsay testimony made by the character Luke. There are no witnesses to these events it is just a tale intent to beguile. How laughable of Luke to say that the tale was perceived to have happened in the Temple as he described by the crowd waiting outside. It defies common sense and belief and is not true in accordance with Deuteronomy law.

Deuteronomy law demands two or three witnesses to establish any matter to be true especially regarding crimes of iniquity and sin and as Luke speaks of an Angel Gabriel that he names and says has come from God then Deuteronomy law and common sense applies. The tale of Zacharias is then established as being untrue. Had such an appearance occurred in the Temple then nobody in the scene described were a witness to that event and were not even told what happened {according to Lukes tale} when ole Zacharias left the Temple. There are No witnesses and yet Lukes description in his tale of the appearance of this Angel he calls Gabriel is most descriptive. This was the origin of the Angel called Gabriel in the whole of history by the way.

This matter of this tale of ole Zacharias was written with a pre thought about intent. When Mary was claimed to be with child and as claimed Mary arose in those days and went to the hill country into the city of Judah and then she entered the house of that very Rabbi Zacharias and then as the tale of Luke claims Mary suddenly became pregnant with Jesus. How convenient. Start the tale of with a Rabbi to give the tale as if Jewish authenticity by a Rabbi no less. Fabricate an Angel claimed to have appeared to a Jewish Rabbi even though there are no actual witnesses to the event claimed to have taken place then add onto the tale of Mary and the claimed birth of Jesus Jesus and let us not forget the tale of John the Baptist all in one summary. With Roman afore thought the very child that ole Zacharias wife was said to have had been sired with was none other than John the Baptist. Who the Roman Christian writers planned on using as a main character of their Christian tales of deception to promote Jesus as being that long awaited Deuteronomy Chapter 18 verses 15/18 Prophet that the Living God promised Moses he would raise up in the midst of the Jews.

Luke claims in Chapter 1 Verse 26 that an Angel called Gabriel appeared again. Verse 26: And in the sixth month the Angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazereth. Verse 27: To a Virgin espoused to a man who’s name was Joseph of the house of David: and the Virgins name was Mary. Luke then claims this Angel Gabriel told Mary that the Holy Ghost would come upon her and she would fall pregnant to a Son of the living God who shall reign over the house of Jacob forever and of his Kingdom there shall be no end. Luke further explains that Mary arose in those days and went to the hill country into the city of Judah and then she entered the house of the Priest Zacharias and then Luke claims that Mary suddenly became pregnant by the Holy Ghost.

Hence the Roman Christian writers with their character Luke introduced main characters of their new testament tales of deception and began those tales of the Virgin birth of Jesus and of John the Baptist, of whom they had planned on portraying at length as Holy men, as the main stories of their New Testaments. There are no actual witness Testimonies backing up any of their claims it is all just a hearsay tale. There is no historical evidence backing up those stories.