Groundbreaking New 9/11 Film "september Clues"

[Hans Olo]

> DNA evidence says there were passengers.
> Or a lot of cover going on.

Where did they get the original DNA to match the DNA they found at ground zero with? Particularly,

"how did they get the DNA from a bunch of middle-eastern islamic madmen?"

(Charles Goyette was asking this question a representative of popular mechanics in 2006.)

[cybe]

I havn't looked into TV-fakery much before, but this short "September Clues" docu got me to look into it further. I've been checking out bits and pieces on Youtube and elsewhere and seen some very convincing material and am now digging through the 911 archive to find higher resolution material.

Here's a little GIF animation I made of a youtube presentation to further point out the obvious two layer bluescreen fakery gone wrong and covered up with "noise":




It's just 11 frames.

Collecting data about possible TV-fakery at: http://100777.com/911/tv_fakery

[stanteau]

TV Fakery is what I'm talking about man, when I say the "diamond in the rough" of 9/11 Truth, that's what I mean

[Archie1970]

I quite enjoyed that video, cheers for posting. The most important part for me was the nose-cone crashing through - that makes no sense. The rest I took with a pinch of salt, though I quite enjoyed the the 'manhattan colours' bit.

[byrd]

Quote:I havn't looked into TV-fakery much before, but this short "September Clues" docu got me to look into it further. I've been checking out bits and pieces on Youtube and elsewhere and seen some very convincing material and am now digging through the 911 archive to find higher resolution material.

Here's a little GIF animation I made of a youtube presentation to further point out the obvious two layer bluescreen fakery gone wrong and covered up with "noise":




It's just 11 frames.

Collecting data about possible TV-fakery at: http://100777.com/911/tv_fakery

whats this supposed to show?

[Nyte]

bump