Groundbreaking New 9/11 Film "september Clues"

[FighterFromAfar]

Reposting my review of September Clues:

The point of this documentary seems to be to support the theory, proposed by one David Shayler, that no planes were involved in the attack on the WTC, but that missiles were. The general impression I get after watching this video is that there's something fishy here, but the documentary makers never conclusively demonstrate that it was a missile that hit the WTC. It's as though the documentary attempts to impress the viewer with the first clip, the "fade to black", "nose in/nose out", etc. and then ride the rest of the "evidence", such as different brightness/colors at different angles, on the coattails of that first clip.

Then let's look at the "missile path" clips, from 20:00, to 23:00, and specifically the side-by-side of the two clips at 21:28. The docu attempts to assert that these clips could not have been taken from different vantage points. However, a simple comparison will show that the clip on the left is taken from a vantage point above and to the left of the clip on the right, which would cause the path of the plane to appear more diagonal across the screen. Even looking at the clip on the right-hand side, you can still see the plane coming in from an angle, not directly from the side. "Is your intelligence insulted yet?" Yes, but insulted by this documentary.

And then useless-yet-interesting information about planted eyewitness accounts and complicity in the coverup at all the news networks as well as details about the Pentagon strike. As if we didn't already know all of this.

A shoddy piece of journalism at best, that raises some questions, but fails to answer them conclusively.


Here's a torrent of the video: http://conspiracycentral.net:6969/stats.ht...6bb9e0621730702