Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

MC David · 08-07-2007, 03:22 AM

By the way that 911 Researchers site is total cointelpro

freeon · 08-07-2007, 04:00 AM

It's not enough that Ron Paul talks explicitly about "the Elites plan for a New World Order".
It's not enough that he knows all about PNAC and their expressed need for a catylizing event.
It's not enough that Ron Paul is the only true-to-the-people congressman. He will vote against unconstitutional bills even if he is the lone dessenter and even if that vote is sure to be used as fodder against him inthe next election.
No, you want him to say to the ignorant sheeple that "911 was as inside job" and somehow that is going to win him favor with those dumbed down sheeple.
You want him to hijack his campaign, hijack the last hope of America, just to supply you with a moment's appeasement.
You probably aren't going to vote anyway, your excuse will be that you don't want anything to do with the system, yet you will attack Ron Paul unless he conforms his every word to your desire.

Who are you?
You are the enemy.

(not directed to any one in particular)

ephilution · 08-07-2007, 11:52 AM

Quote:You know, Ron Paul can say that and get away with it... anyone who has really researched 9/11 knows Mossad was heavily involved. There are many noted dual Israeli-American citizens in the Bush Administration. What I'm saying is that 9/11 was not an "inside job" technically, it was a Mossad operation, and a double cross against the Bush Administration by Israel.

Why is it then that Ron Paul stated publicly in one of his TV interviews I posted earlier that he wants to go after Osama Bin Laden? According to you, he would have been more truthful if he stated that he wants to go after the head of the Mossad. But then again, you cannot demand politicians to be that truthful now can you?

I'm getting a feeling Ron Paul is spinning away ever further from the truth and, by extension, from the people. I wonder if his sentiments regarding the Fed still hold water.

Get ready for 'whooping and whipping' Billary folks. Yeeeh harrr!

MC David · 08-07-2007, 09:42 PM

Quote:It's not enough that Ron Paul talks explicitly about "the Elites plan for a New World Order".
It's not enough that he knows all about PNAC and their expressed need for a catylizing event.
It's not enough that Ron Paul is the only true-to-the-people congressman. He will vote against unconstitutional bills even if he is the lone dessenter and even if that vote is sure to be used as fodder against him inthe next election.
No, you want him to say to the ignorant sheeple that "911 was as inside job" and somehow that is going to win him favor with those dumbed down sheeple.
You want him to hijack his campaign, hijack the last hope of America, just to supply you with a moment's appeasement.
You probably aren't going to vote anyway, your excuse will be that you don't want anything to do with the system, yet you will attack Ron Paul unless he conforms his every word to your desire.

Who are you?
You are the enemy.

(not directed to any one in particular)

This says it all

shZ · 08-08-2007, 06:17 AM

Quote:
Quote:So why does Chomsky get ripped on if Ron Paul is so popular here?

Because he's not running for president & has the luxury to say 9/11 was an inside job if he wants w/way less repercussion. His views are also 180 degrees different than Ron Paul & he supports population reduction, complete gun control & world government. He's also never spoken about the Federal Reserve & exposed any of that & basically supports the New World Order.

That's total bullshit, and you know it, except yes, he does support gun control. I specifically remember him (in some article or interview) making a negative reference to fiat currency.

MC David · 08-08-2007, 07:42 AM

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:So why does Chomsky get ripped on if Ron Paul is so popular here?

Because he's not running for president & has the luxury to say 9/11 was an inside job if he wants w/way less repercussion. His views are also 180 degrees different than Ron Paul & he supports population reduction, complete gun control & world government. He's also never spoken about the Federal Reserve & exposed any of that & basically supports the New World Order.
That's total bullshit, and you know it, except yes, he does support gun control. I specifically remember him (in some article or interview) making a negative reference to fiat currency.

Besides the one thing I was mistaken about about the currency how does what I said constitute 'total bullshit'? I would also not say something knowing it was bullshit & don't appreciate the suggestion. It's one thing to say you're wrong, it's another to say you're deliberately lying when there's no evidence to support it that's fucked up.

Chomsky says the 2nd amendment doesn't state the right to bare arms which he's either mistaken about or deliberately lying & he supports total gun control probably to the point of a total ban on guns which Hitler, Stalin, etc. were also for. He supports the UN I think. He supports the official manmade global warming theory. What part of this establishes what I said as bullshit b/c it all seems to support it intead. Just cause he says things that are right about the war & right about Palestine, etc., okay that's good but then he leads you in the wrong direction of where the power lies & actually promotes a lot of the rest of the elite's agenda. My point in stating this was you asked how is Paul any better than Chomsky, why does he get a better rep. Paul's better b/c his positions on all this stuff are the right ones he's anti-UN, etc. besides just the 9/11 issue which his position is similiar to Chomsky's that it was 'blowback' which is false.

This article lays out a lot of good points, the only part that's innaccurate is labeling Holocaust revisionists as 'Holocaust deniers' & saying there's no evidence to support anything contrary to the official version of it: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april...0406Chomsky.htm

freeon · 08-08-2007, 11:21 AM

It should be noted that the attributed quote in the topic title is a complete lie. It is not what he said.

I'll paraphrase:
The fauxnews tool asked him "do you believe 9/11 was an inside job?"
Ron said "If by 'inside job' you mean 'our government did it' then no I don't."

How many times has Bush been elected? 0
Is he the president? Not really, only by usurpation.
Did "our government" carry out 9/11? No, a faction of traitors within the government did.

For "our government" to carry out 9/11 would imply the congress and the executive branch being complicit. When Ron Paul said it wasn't "our government", he only spoke a true statement.

***TriWooOx*** · 08-08-2007, 11:35 AM

Quote:It should be noted that the attributed quote in the topic title is a complete lie. It is not what he said.

I'll paraphrase:
The fauxnews tool asked him "do you believe 9/11 was an inside job?"
Ron said "If by 'inside job' you mean 'our government did it' then no I don't."

How many times has Bush been elected? 0
Is he the president? Not really, only by usurpation.
Did "our government" carry out 9/11? No, a faction of traitors within the government did.

For "our government" to carry out 9/11 would imply the congress and the executive branch being complicit. When Ron Paul said it wasn't "our government", he only spoke a true statement.

How many times did you want to say that:)

Well, i just copied the title from the website..

freeon · 08-08-2007, 11:42 AM

Let this be a lesson in the communicationdisrption techniques possessed and employed by the enemies of freedom.

rockclimber · 08-08-2007, 02:42 PM

Quote:It should be noted that the attributed quote in the topic title is a complete lie. It is not what he said.

I'll paraphrase:
The fauxnews tool asked him "do you believe 9/11 was an inside job?"
Ron said "If by 'inside job' you mean 'our government did it' then no I don't."

How many times has Bush been elected? 0
Is he the president? Not really, only by usurpation.
Did "our government" carry out 9/11? No, a faction of traitors within the government did.

For "our government" to carry out 9/11 would imply the congress and the executive branch being complicit. When Ron Paul said it wasn't "our government", he only spoke a true statement.

I think your on to something here after looking at the faux quote. LOL, he pulled a Clinton...(that depends on what the definition of is, is)

I wonder how he would answer if asked if 9-11 were an outside job?

Like it or not, from a political pov, it was a good way to answer the question and he may well believe it was an outside job/Mossad connection, we just don't know.

All speculation of course.

harflimon · 08-08-2007, 07:10 PM

Quote:I wonder how he would answer if asked if 9-11 were an outside job?

Uhh... What other type of job could it be besides inside or outside? A beside job?

MC David · 08-08-2007, 07:33 PM

The last I'm gonna say about it is at least Ron Paul doesn't promote more war by saying that 9/11 wasn't an inside job, he instead says Chomsky & others' theory that it happened mainly because of wars & foreign intervention & that stopping this is the key to preventing terrorism. & he supports the end of all occupations & foreign entaglements with Israel, etc. & a new independent 9/11 investigation on top of that.

rockclimber · 08-08-2007, 09:31 PM

Quote:
Quote:I wonder how he would answer if asked if 9-11 were an outside job?

Uhh... What other type of job could it be besides inside or outside? A beside job?

My point is if they would have phrased the question properly he may have provided an answer they may not have liked.

Inside job=US government
Outside job=Mossad

Perhaps he believes it was exclusively and outside job?

harflimon · 08-08-2007, 09:44 PM

But what if he believes the official version (which he doesn't). What would that be an Islam job? Hell I guess some people think it was an outer-space job (beam theory).

I guess what I'm saying is that to most people an outside job would mean 19 arabs on planes instead of mossad. This was faux news after all :wink:

rockclimber · 08-08-2007, 10:26 PM

Quote:But what if he believes the official version (which he doesn't). What would that be an Islam job? Hell I guess some people think it was an outer-space job (beam theory).

I guess what I'm saying is that to most people an outside job would mean 19 arabs on planes instead of mossad. This was faux news after all :wink:

You got me on that one...overlooked that part, almost forgot about the "official" theory. ;) :rolleyes: