Video of the guy who took the Battery Park footage refusing to talk about it

[stanteau]

http://www.livevideo.com/video/killtown/8A...-hit-foota.aspx

The first half is only about debunking the footage, the second half has them calling the guy who took it, verify that is the guy who took the video, and than he clams the fuck up.

I won't say anymore, but this guys a fuckin shill for some type of agency and they are planting evidence, period.

[hilly7]

Interesting

[MC David]

I think it's more likely that he refuses to talk about it because he was pre-positioned there ahead of time for the purpose of filming the plane hit.

[waxzy]

Its like those amazing CGI videos of UFO's floating all over Youtube

You can't trust what your eyes see in videos or on TV, period.

Heres a link to the CNN psyops article mentioned in the video:

U.S. Army 'Psyops' Specialists worked for CNN
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/devries/psyops.htm

[byrd]

'grasping.at.straws'

[MC David]

The no plane people are typically also the energy beams people who say that there was no molten metal at the WTC weeks afterwards & spread other blatant lies, they also by & large deny the Zionist involvement so I don't trust anything they put out.

I'm more concerned with stopping war with Iran & preventing military dictatorship which can be prevented by spreading more solid, smoking gun evidence about 9/11 than putting it all on the line to prove that no planes hit it. We've given Iraq the equivalent to over 300 9/11s since then so that's where my focus is.

[standvast]

No planes , no holograms of planes, no molting metal, directed energy weapons,
whats the next step, saying the towers wheren't even there all along ?
What new and event explanatory info does this "no-plane" crowd come with/help surface ?
right..nada.

[Shinobi]

Quote:'grasping.at.straws'

Too right

Straw men lol.

[MrBS]

This guy sold the video to CNN - and I doubt it was just the video.

No doubt he sold away his rights to talk about the video, to talk about his 9/11 experience, to have any connection with the video, to give any (media) interviews about the video + loads of other clauses (you all know what bastards these media scum are).

Would you risk getting your ass sued by a big Ziocompany by speaking to some random Canadian?

[MC David]

Quote:This guy sold the video to CNN - and I doubt it was just the video.

No doubt he sold away his rights to talk about the video, to talk about his 9/11 experience, to have any connection with the video, to give any (media) interviews about the video + loads of other clauses (you all know what bastards these media scum are).

Would you risk getting your ass sued by a big Ziocompany by speaking to some random Canadian?

But does that mean that the planes weren't real? Cause that seems like a jump to assumption to me.

[MrBS]

Quote:

Quote:This guy sold the video to CNN - and I doubt it was just the video.

No doubt he sold away his rights to talk about the video, to talk about his 9/11 experience, to have any connection with the video, to give any (media) interviews about the video + loads of other clauses (you all know what bastards these media scum are).

Would you risk getting your ass sued by a big Ziocompany by speaking to some random Canadian?

But does that mean that the planes weren't real? Cause that seems like a jump to assumption to me.

Of course the planes weren't real !!!

It was giant flying tea cosies that hit the WTC.... didn't you know?!

[stanteau]

Quote:No planes , no holograms of planes, no molting metal, directed energy weapons,
whats the next step, saying the towers wheren't even there all along ?
What new and event explanatory info does this "no-plane" crowd come with/help surface ?
right..nada.

Before I began keep this in mind, 99% of people ask the same questions, "Why would they do that?" and I don't know, why would they hit the Pentagon without a plane? Why wouldn't they just crash one in Shanksville? But no, because we "saw" the planes on our "televisions" than it's all dead true right? Look, instead of asking "why they would do that", examine the evidence, and ask yourself "[u]Does the military and it's tentacles (which include the Zionist controlled media, they would be the only group able to actually pull off such a media hoax Infinite) be able to do the things that they did? With the army detonating tactical nukes in Baghdad who knows, not you, that's who.

So first things first, the news used fake footage on 9/11, best example being This video that shows an empty street right after the second plane crash and it's a bit tedious to watch but this video shows some SERIOUSLY strange anomolies in the video comparisons.

Than everyone says "There were witnesses!" like this fake witness or commercial actor Gary Welz who saw a plane on 9/11 for MSNBC and than recently played a 9/11 skeptic professor for a CW station, and in this video ADMITS IT!

So there's proof creating reasonable doubt that they have edited and manipulated live video and such.

As for the beam weapons/mini-nukes, What's with the melted cars?

Than there's the stealth vehicles and weaponry used and don't be afraid of the UFO tag, it simply means that, an unidentified flying object at the WTC. Here's a great one, the third clip is especially clear and people are gonna say "that's video compression!" and stand back, is it? These videos are consistent from station to station and angle to angle, do a google search for 9/11 stealth, there's TONS of these sightings.

After all that, here's the video evidence showing NO plane or a non-consistent plane

I'm out

[byrd]

Quote:This guy sold the video to CNN - and I doubt it was just the video.

No doubt he sold away his rights to talk about the video, to talk about his 9/11 experience, to have any connection with the video, to give any (media) interviews about the video + loads of other clauses (you all know what bastards these media scum are).

Would you risk getting your ass sued by a big Ziocompany by speaking to some random Canadian?

Bingo

[stanteau]

Hey, watch Rumsfeld squirm when asked about high energy weaponry

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONqnO5sYsqg

[MC David]

Quote:

Quote:No planes , no holograms of planes, no molting metal, directed energy weapons,
whats the next step, saying the towers wheren't even there all along ?
What new and event explanatory info does this "no-plane" crowd come with/help surface ?
right..nada.

Before I began keep this in mind, 99% of people ask the same questions, "Why would they do that?" and I don't know, why would they hit the Pentagon without a plane? Why wouldn't they just crash one in Shanksville? But no, because we "saw" the planes on our "televisions" than it's all dead true right? Look, instead of asking "why they would do that", examine the evidence, and ask yourself "[u]Does the military and it's tentacles (which include the Zionist controlled media, they would be the only group able to actually pull off such a media hoax Infinite) be able to do the things that they did? With the army detonating tactical nukes in Baghdad who knows, not you, that's who.

So first things first, the news used fake footage on 9/11, best example being This video that shows an empty street right after the second plane crash and it's a bit tedious to watch but this video shows some SERIOUSLY strange anomolies in the video comparisons.

Than everyone says "There were witnesses!" like this fake witness or commercial actor Gary Welz who saw a plane on 9/11 for MSNBC and than recently played a 9/11 skeptic professor for a CW station, and in this video ADMITS IT!

So there's proof creating reasonable doubt that they have edited and manipulated live video and such.

As for the beam weapons/mini-nukes, What's with the melted cars?

Than there's the stealth vehicles and weaponry used and don't be afraid of the UFO tag, it simply means that, an unidentified flying object at the WTC. Here's a great one, the third clip is especially clear and people are gonna say "that's video compression!" and stand back, is it? These videos are consistent from station to station and angle to angle, do a google search for 9/11 stealth, there's TONS of these sightings.

After all that, here's the video evidence showing NO plane or a non-consistent plane

I'm out

Some interesting stuff here