Pindar?

[SerialExpLain]

So if we have this:

Quote:descended directly from the Monnet family, with a lineage link to Jean Monnet de Blanchefort, and descending down to Bertrand de Blanchefort the 4th Grand Master of the Knight Templars and the Order of SION in 1071 AD, from the Pyrenees, in Southern France

http://www.akasha.de/~aton/AUNACVIntro.html

Is the Knight Pindar mentioned -- the PINDAR??? The Big Wig Pindar??

[ephilution]

Quote:So if we have this:

Quote:descended directly from the Monnet family, with a lineage link to Jean Monnet de Blanchefort, and descending down to Bertrand de Blanchefort the 4th Grand Master of the Knight Templars and the Order of SION in 1071 AD, from the Pyrenees, in Southern France

http://www.akasha.de/~aton/AUNACVIntro.html

Is the Knight Pindar mentioned -- the PINDAR??? The Big Wig Pindar??

Do you mean the so-called Shape-shifting Lizard Illuminati King "Pindar" as mentioned in an interview with David Icke by "no-I'm-not-an-agent-and/or-under-mind-control-it-just-seems-that-way" Arizona Wilder? What's the fuzz anyway?

[SerialExpLain]

Dunno, ever heard of a sister project to Montauk, called M.A.L.D.A., an anagram for Montauk-Alsace-Lorraine Dimensional Activation?

Not much info here in the states on that.

Haha...yeah, Icke definitely got everybody in the NET didn't he?

[Light Invisible]

I take it that you all do know that the Priory of Sion was proven as a fake don't you?

It happened after the publication of Holy Blood Holy Grail, which stirred up a lot of interest about the Priory but funnily enough Dan Brown still released the Davinci Code but then again as he put it he writes fiction so it didn't matter.

http://priory-of-sion.com/posd/pdchparchments.html
http://priory-of-sion.com/posd/posdebunking.html

Mike

[SerialExpLain]

Really, doesn't strike me as fake at all. Was really what those protocols were stamped as being Sion rather than Zion. Why not both?

There is a wealth of information on the net that rather lends itself to think it is very alive and well. Someone has to be at the tipty top, now doesn't there?

I view life circa 2007 as rather viewing the Tower of Babel, a spectrum of divergent cacaphony and lots of 1984-speak. Many times I just think of the movie the Good Son, and ask what would that boy have done. Why he would have blamed another. Easy concept. Either Machiavelli was an evil genius or he wasn't.
I just don't find absolutes a lot of places. Yes, a story that could be easily discredited could be put forth, add some questionable parties and step back and say it was all fake, but unfortunately there is history that happened, i.e., crusades. They are simply the templars.

The way I view what is happening is best represented in the video Angels and Demons Revealed. Intuitively, that feels right to me.

And this site explains much:

Quote:Sir Francis Beacon, made certain that the hidden god of war and Ammunition, A-MON Ra, became the capstone of the label of currency, as the All Seeing Hidden Eye of Mon-Ra, called "MON-EYE" in old English spelling. Beacon who rearranged the English language and added some 10,000 words therein, who studied the Egyptian Mysteries and Kaballa with Les Pleiade Group of Philosophers in Paris, and his mentor Agent 007, the cryptologist Dr. John Dee, who channelled angel Uriel through Earl Kelly, and after whom the Royal Society of Science is named. Moneye is the cult of the "fallen" Ra, the hidden Mon Capstone of the Pyramid (all seeing eye in the dollar bill) of archaic Egypt.

http://www.akasha.de/~aton/GNNLogos.html

And another video I found fascinating:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=93...h&plindex=2

[Light Invisible]

I don't get your point about the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"!

The point of the Priory of Sion, according to its alleged Grand Master Pierre Plantard was the protection of the bloodline of Jesus which had come down to the present day through the Merovingian dynasty.

There was supposed to have been a plan to reveal it to the world at the Millenium and shake the foundations of Christianity.

Mike

[SerialExpLain]

I saw some documentary on TV regarding debunking the Plantard issue. And I agree that that aspect of it is probably a fake, smoke and mirrors diversion to discount the Priory of Sion.

But if you watch a lot of William Henry material, it is obvious, to me at least, that there is more to it in this time in history. Obviously, historically it is relavent as witnessed in the crusades.

Now, what is interesting to me about the Protocols is that supposedly the stamp is Sion not Zion. And protocol 11 specifically mentions secret masonry and the very stamp supposedly contained a reference to 33 degree. That would explain why Zionists considered it a fraud, because if it were a separate group it would be a fraud to the Zionists.

This article touches on what I am inclined to believe happened:

http://www.geocities.com/newworldorder_the...rs_of_Zion.html

I do not agree with the Zionists either and I agree with the statements put forth by Ted Pike in his material thoroughly. I want to make that very clear that I am not defending them. But the Balfour declaration really got things jumping in the middle east and who really had a hand in that?

I keep returning to what Albert Pike had stated and, again, I can see that many sides have been pitted against each other.

http://conspiracycentral.info/index.php?showtopic=15107

[Light Invisible]

Quote:I keep returning to what Albert Pike had stated and, again, I can see that many sides have been pitted against each other.

Wow left-field! What did Pike say about the Protocols?

Mike

[SerialExpLain]

The Protocols are addressed seperatedly (link provided above). However, what Albert Pike said about three world wars was quite definitive that there would be manipulation towards that. So, if that were to be the case then there would be the manipulator(s) and the manipulated (two or more sides).

Now, if you apply the concept that the Protocols are the Illuminati Protocols and may very well NOT be attributed to the "Zionists". (That evidenced that by the fact that they always claimed they were a forgery,.) Who really put them forth and the link I provided above touches on that.

So, then combine that with the Albert Pike quote and it may give perspective that there was indeed a separate force manipulating "Zionists" and that the Protocols themselves would better be defined as the Illuminati Protocols.

As the link in the post above explained much of the history, prominence is given to Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d'Alveydre and his writings. A very interesting article in that regard can be found at the link offered below.

From this site's link on Google:

Quote:It all began with a French occultist Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre (1824-1909). D’Alveydre devised Synarchy

http://www.specularium.org/index.php?optio...3&Itemid=79