|
The Dummies Guide to 9/11 "No-Planer Theory"
|
|
11-11-2007, 11:49 PM
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dummies Guide to 9/11 "No-Planer Theory"
Personally I don't like to rule anything out but I need a shred of hard evidence to cling onto and I don't think the NPT has provided that. The nose-out thing was probably the most intriguing aspect but I'm not going to throw Occam's razor out the window for a gray, pixelated mass which could just as easily turn out to be a coincidental ejection of debri funneled through the open floor space.
I think Pepe's explanation for the whole 'knife through butter' thing makes sense, and is basically the line of though I've subscribed to myself. Plus I would've thought that explosives (or crushing debri if combined) could turn concrete to dust so I don't really see a problem on that score. It's just one of those things which I personally see as a distraction when the likelihood of it being factual are minute to say the least. |
|||
|
11-12-2007, 03:56 AM
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dummies Guide to 9/11 "No-Planer Theory"
If the concrete is turned to dust what is the mass necessary to generate the energy required to aerosolize concrete composed of? Don't forget that steel beams were being hurled horizontally for hundreds of feet. So, what is left which could conceivably have enough energy to do the dirty work.
I don't know what hit the north tower but I am reasonably certain that a plane of some sort hit the south tower. I am also reasonably certain that the videos of the plane hitting the south tower were diddled with. The engines should have started to shear off of the wings on impact with the building and so should the wings , and the tail section. But this does not happen in any of the videos of the crash that I have seen, instead the plane enters the building like it was made of gauze. There is no visible decceleration, were the laws of physics suspended for that day? An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it. Mohandas Gandhi Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind. Did you think you were put here for something less? Chief Arvol Looking Horse |
|||
|
11-12-2007, 06:45 AM
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dummies Guide to 9/11 "No-Planer Theory"
maybe the plane had a dew weapon on it..it would explain the flash at entry?
The first step to revolution is consciousness, So I wont stop screaming at you until this all make sense. |
|||
|
11-13-2007, 01:26 PM
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dummies Guide to 9/11 "No-Planer Theory"
just a new thought
they managed to confiscate all video evidence of the pentagon crash, what was stopping them from doing the same with wtc towers, how many people would actually lie about having footage if some fbi guys came and asked for it ? |
|||
|
11-13-2007, 01:44 PM
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Dummies Guide to 9/11 "No-Planer Theory"
the evidence for no planes is clear, the only real issue is the surrposive large amount of video evidence from people on the ground, but yet to see 100s of different videos of the 2nd impact in wtc
so theres video out there... somewhere... |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)






