Osama Bin Laden is dead since December 26, 2001. Translation of Funeral Article in Egyptian Paper al-Wafd

[hilly7]

IMHO it is not who in terms of players but rather who in term of the ultimate advantage, the IMF and World Banks. It does take quite a lot of planning and several people working together, then again, most of what they do is just that. For America, the loss of freedoms through bills that would have incited riots if they were attempted in a positive atmosphere. This loss of rights seduces more into slavery and control. The ultimate goal however was indebtiness, which was achieved.


While money can't buy friends, it usually does invite faithfulliness. Given the shrinking information that Americans have about many other countries and customs, the fake can be injected and enemies created from thin air based upon ignorance. All the while amuzing the masses and distraction for those not amuzed easily. This can be easily done with divison, color, race, beliefs, classes, and the list goes on. Then there are a few that will fall for pride, and as was elequently stated, "Pride goeth before a fall." How many bumper stickers did Lowes give out saying "Power of Pride".


The players were not the masterminds behind this, just acting their parts. Either knowingly or not, human action is fairly predictable. Perhaps that is the stall in the plans, they have time. Then again, looking back through history, this is a repeated occurance I have recently learned. This way the wealthy stay wealthy and in power, the rich (different than wealth) can be changed (think of it as a treat). Workers stay obdienant and within their confines, cheap labor, and totally dependant (even though the illusion of freedom is present).


The recent stock market crash began with a bill that Clinton passed and Bush continued and through both we have a coming choice on the bail out from the IMF and World Bank, same as Russia did, same as Iceland does, which way will we go? Your looking for good guys and bad guys at lower levels, who knows? The real wizards are behind a curtain.


Iran, Iraq, Afganstan, Syria, I don't know enough to say good or bad, but I do know they wanted an end to the US based petro dollar, and that throws a wrench in the IMF & WB's plans. Eventually however, 1 bank, 1 currency equals total control. As R so accurately put it, Governemnts job is to appear to fail. This makes governments looks like stooges so that they look better and that will mean people will trust their plans eventually. Why they picked the dollar, who knows? China, while it seems a renegade isn't, they are just playing their role, knowlingly or unknowlingly, does it matter? Top dogs get rewarded and just like many things, often times clearance is in levels, then there are the patsies.


Dramatic production on 911, yet done with money, not wealth. No wealth was lost, nor was money, just returned on wealth and money transferred. Example: How many have you heard that benefitted off Tami-Flu admit it can not stop HN51? Yet Rumsfield made lots of money along with others from fear. Certain companies were debased while others climbed. Private sector companies got public funding, think of it as corporate socialism. The division of have and have nots has seldom been this one sided. No, 911 wasn't a surprize and I believe not funded by a CIA trained operative (Bin Laden) in some remote cave, especially when they film on such a shitty camera. lol.


The logic in 911 was to enslave a people and perhaps a world while keeping us divided in the most proffitable game of all, war.