The great thermate debate

[JazzRoc]

JFK, I could have drawn the same thing for you. One could have produced a whole batch of "C"-shaped devices with snap-on magnetic clamps and remotely-operable radio detonators, and inserted them around the columns on the floors above the false ceiling level where the workmen were known to have had access six weeks prior to the event (in, I believe, one of the towers only. Is this true?). It would be a HUGE BATCH of stuff, but it's ABSOLUTELY doable, and in minutes. To THIS devious mind it is, anyway...

But did ANY of those floors COINCIDE with the point of failure in either tower - the aircraft impact points? I'm willing to bet that they didn't.

And another point is that THAT would be the way to take down a CONVENTIONAL redundant cubic lattice concrete/steel structure, all right. But the construction of the towers was UNUSUAL, in that there was NO CONCRETE cladding the columns at all. So a heavy fast plane could get inside, its exploding kerosine load could blow away the column foam insulation, and the ensuing fire could soften the columns beneath their buckling strength, and Robert could be your father's brother.

There was NO NEED to use therm*te. The planes had sufficient energy. The coincidences of TWO plane strikes and TWO failure points are difficult to ignore, but somehow you are managing it.

Occam?