The True Torah Jews Have No Part In The Affair Against The Swiss

[harmonius]

I guess I will take this into further digression off subject...

[EDIT]: @ Phil999 sort of...

Yes Phil, I agree with much of that.

I think we have to expose who is doing what so that we can change what they are doing. The key element in this seems to be the one thing that people often are incapable of; that is to say we are, almost pathologically, unable to ask the correct questions (percentages are higher here mind you.) Most people can't ask a correct question to save their lives, if they can actually ask a question at all. Most people only have questions like: "Should I have fries with that, or the side salad?"

It's fine to want to change things, but unless we have the ability to ask ourselves what we want and what is important individually/collectively and what our responsibilities are, we are quite likely, to paraphrase you, to end up with the same problems. It does so happen that there are particular groups that have far greater representation and influence than many in the system of control.

So then, what do we do to expose these people most effectively whilst incapacitating the mental and physical organization that that causes these thought forms and actions to continue? In some ways I understand why during revolutions like with Pol-Pot or Stalin etc. you completely wipe out the intelligentsia including their institutions so you can replace them with your own. Unfortunately this method is ultimately thee younger wolf challenging the Alpha male for dominance over the pack, with a whole lot of casualties. Nothing really changes in the end.

The cycle always seems to repeat in this manner except for civilizations that simply fade away due to environmental over-taxation or cultural degradation, both of which stem from arrogance. The third method of course is the freak of nature tidal wave or asteroid.

In the broadest sense, what do we want, what are we going to do, and how are we going to do it? Questions for each of us to reflect upon.

I think of TKRA at this point with his 'greedtards' saying and see how aptly it applies. What kind of therapy do we undertake to halt the pathological meme of greedtardism?

I like the idea of the US Republic-an system that was the ultimate attempt to provide individual rights within the framework of a Federal system. However the inherent desire of people to want an easy life and be sold lies that are 'to good to be true,' is rampant and I think may always be. This should be obvious for all to see at this point on the collective level. That being said, perhaps the only way to guard against abuse of power is to have no institutions with the ability to wield great power at all, ie: No Federalsim. Decentralized autonomous zones that are run on the merits of individuals and the common interest, not by powers of persuasion. Should the virtuous not lead? I know it sounds kinda Utopian and the world is so perilously uneducated and disinterested that it probably is. So without forcing our will on others, how do we change the game without resorting to the dirty tricks of TPTB?

Education is obviously the key, but people need to be at a level where they are truly empowered and shown the skills to make healthy informed choices. Giving people the skills and powers of discernment to determine what is appropriate is probably more important than all the NWO exposing because people will see the effects of devious behaviour and know exactly what to do about it. This comes to mind: Rudolf Rocker wrote in Anarcho-Syndicalism: "Political rights do not originate in parliaments; they are rather forced upon them from without. And even their enactment into law has for a long time been no guarantee of their security. They do not exist because they have been legally set down on a piece of paper, but only when they have become the ingrown habit of a people, and when any attempt to impair them will meet with the violent resistance of the populace."

Once we realize what the game is and how its being played vis a vis black ops, false flags, social engineering, economics, education etc., it becomes so transparently obvious what is going on. In other words it would be like watching a hockey game for the first time; you would have no clue. Once you learn the rules It is as plain as day. You could stop watching hockey for 20 years, all the players have changed, but the game is the same. I feel the exact same way about the NWO shell game. I know the rules; how the game is played, what the goals are, what plays will be used, which teams are on the roster. In fact it is painfully obvious to me at this point. I could quite easily stop researching everything related to the subject, walk away for 50 years, and know exactly what is happening in the world. That's why I stopped reading Icke after perusing a few pages of the book that came out after the biggest secret. There was nothing new, it's all formula from there on in. His work like most is just rehash/reflection of the the world he studies. I had a guy ask me to help him write a book about the NWO and go on a speaking tour with him. I saw no point because I could point out at least 100 books and and a vast number of speakers that people could already see. I would have only been helping to regurgitate the same information available. All I need to do is create the interest in someone and the rest is all available.

Most people who get information about what is going on ultimately have to go to work the next day just to make ends meet. There are so few alternatives that will give the people freedom to live the life they want. Almost all alternatives still rely on the system and are beholden to it. And when trying to make ends meet there is usually no energy to deal with fighting the system. I would be much happier trying to create an autonomous centre for people to participate and create a template for a working system on a small scale. This may even be the most dangerous route to take because nothing poses a greater threat to the system than a good alternative example and we could all probably list a few groups wiped out for attempting just that.


Maybe I'm rambling now, and waaaay off subject but that's what you spurred on Phil...


MMM

PS: just befor I posted this I did a preview and saw your post rockclimber which was not there at the start of my writing. Funny how we kind of on the same wavelength about as you said: ""what are people going to research this for the next 20-years?" Yeah like JFK, and get nowhere?":)