What's The Difference Between Hitler And Bush?

[mothandrust]

what's the difference between Hitler and Bush?


(in whatever warped and twisted way) Hitler believed he was fighting for a better world.






Bush only says he is.

[harflimon]

He is fighting for a better world. A better world for himself and his cronies.

[Shinobi]

I was never aware there was much of a difference atall - except for the moustache
you should have also added tony blair to this too....

No, infact anything in the political spectrum would have done
just about anything and everything going on now hitler would have intro'd eventually

They all work on and for the same agenda, furthermore they gotta be the biggest copycats around in the world all copying each other in what they do and say..makes me wonder, who's really the biggest sheep of them all....

Puppets & Puppet Masters & Puppet Masters who are also Puppets

[aaronmann]

hitler was more public about what he was doing, while all bush does is lie.

bah, there's no difference between the two really ...

(satire warning):
someone probably has some of hitler's blood somewhere on ice and they gave doobya a shot of it >_<

[justice]

Yes but Bush has learnt from Hittlers mistakes !

OK i know he's to thick to even do that but i tried

[aaronmann]

well bush's (great?) grandpa "prescott" did get his bank siezed for funding the nazi party...

[Moriani]

Quote:He is fighting for a better world. A better world for himself and his cronies.

Hardly. He's fighting for your "way of life."

Let's face it, no one has the guts to make the hard choices. It would be political suicide for a US president to say that effective immediately, all foreign imports of oil are banned, all automobile owners must pay a $3,000 annual registration fee to the national government to own a vehicle, a $5/per gallon gas tax will be added, all diesel 18-wheel trucks are banned and the national government will no longer fund highway construction projects of any type. That president would probably be impeached, and certainly not re-elected.

The US at 300 Million people represents 3.8% of the world population, but uses 25% of the world's oil. Fully 2/3 is for transporation, so people can commute and joy ride in their SUVs.

That's what's driving this conflict and all future conflicts over the next 30 years. The quest for secure oil markets. No president wants to preside over the worst depression in US history, but there's little choice. It's either war or listen to fickle Americans whine about the economy, and political parties exist to maintain power, not sit on the side-lines and watch the other party rule. Of course they're going to war.

[harflimon]

How amazingly naive. First of all this war is hardly just for oil. The billions of dollars he is throwing at his friends in industry could probably solve our countries energy crisis. So no, he isn't fighting for "my way of life". Not to mention the continued balkanization of the Middle East which will probably lead to civil war and the deployment of NATO/UN peacekeepers. This will bring more territory under the control of the Globalists. It was all well planned out, if you care to read the PNAC documents or anything by Zbigniew Brzezinski or Henry Kissinger. You act like you just took a sociology class and think the "corporations" are out to get you.

Your worldview is short-sighted. If you think any leader is truly for his "people" you are crazy.

[waxzy]

hmmm the difference....

hitler spoke german and had a little mustache?

[aaronmann]

yeah, that's the biggest difference right there. bush don't have the little moustache >_<

otherwise they look a lot alike wouldn't you say?


i dunno, if you ask me i think bush is just plain retarded.



:LOL:


honestly though, if he gets a third term and we get martial law in 2007/2008 then i'll hardly be able to see a difference

[Moriani]

Quote:How amazingly naive. First of all this war is hardly just for oil. The billions of dollars he is throwing at his friends in industry could probably solve our countries energy crisis. So no, he isn't fighting for "my way of life". Not to mention the continued balkanization of the Middle East which will probably lead to civil war and the deployment of NATO/UN peacekeepers. This will bring more territory under the control of the Globalists. It was all well planned out, if you care to read the PNAC documents or anything by Zbigniew Brzezinski or Henry Kissinger. You act like you just took a sociology class and think the "corporations" are out to get you.

Your worldview is short-sighted. If you think any leader is truly for his "people" you are crazy.

On the contrary.

Why do corporations exist? Because people are weak.

Americans in their quest for Borg-like consumption spend every dime they have, then spend money they don't have using credit cards, and for what? To feel good?

Small business ruled the US not but 30 years ago. The hardware store, gas station, grocery store, drug store, restaurant etc were all small business owners. You knew them. They lived in your community. Your kids went to school with theirs, played sports with theirs, you went bowling and played softball with them. The money you gave to them built roads, schools, hospitals and parks in your community.

Then Madison Avenue convinced the weakling people that was really a stupid thing to do, and it would be better if everyone got on their knees and begged to put all of their money plus money they don't even have in the pockets of some guy wearing a silk suit whom they don't even know and doesn't live in their community.

No one holds a gun to your head and makes you shop at Wal-Mart, or eat at a corporate box restaurant like Appleby's, or buy your gas from one of the huge conglomerates. You do that because you want to do that. And for what? So you can say you have the entire "TJ Hooker" TV series DVD collection?

You empowered the corporations of your own free will, and now you're upset because they hold so much power and sway and abuse it.

You can't have both ways. You can't support corporations then expect them to act decently. Corporations are no different than States. Each is selfish and acts in its own self-interest.

You have the power to stop corporations. It just takes a little self-discipline. Stop supporting and patronizing them.

And yes, the war is all about oil. The fact that some corporate cronies have benefited is incidental.

If that were not true, then the US would not have written the Iraqi constitution to clearly state that all currently untapped oil reserves are excluded from nationalization, and that all future oil discoveries are also excluded from naturalization, ie they will be owned and operated by multi-national corporations. And that is why the Iraqi constitution, written by the US, also includes the right of the US to maintain 6 military bases in Iraq permanently, so that the US can protect its oil.

Cheney's Iraqi Oil Map

Cheney List of Foreign Contracts to be Denied 1

Cheney List of Foreign Contracts to be Denied 2


From the Council on Foreign Relations written by John Deutch and James R. Schlesinger.

Quote:For example, China is aligning its relationships in the Middle East (e.g., Iran and Saudi Arabia) and Africa (e.g., Nigeria and Sudan) because of its desire to secure oil supplies.

These new realignments have further diminished U.S. leverage, particularly in the Middle East and Central Asia. For example, Chinese interest in securing oil and gas supplies challenges U.S. influence in central Asia, notably in Kazakhstan. And Russia’s influence is likely to grow as it exports oil and (within perhaps a decade) large amounts of natural gas to Japan and China.

Another example is Chinese firms taking a position in Saudi Arabia, along with several Western firms, in developing Saudi Arabia’s gas infrastructure. At present, these arrangements have little effect on world oil and gas markets because the volumes affected are small. However, such arrangements are spreading. These arrangements are worrisome because they lead to special political relationships that pose difficulties for the United States. And they allow importers to believe that they obtain security through links to particular suppliers rather than from the proper functioning of a global market.

The presence of NOCs is important because many NOCs do not respond to market forces as would a private, competitive firm.

Investment decisions on actions to increase production by an NOC can be less responsive to
market price signals than an investor-owned international oil company (IOC).

Deutch is a former CIA Director and Schlesinger was formerly Secretary of Defense and of Energy.

US actions are intended solely to secure oil markets, and secondarily to prevent conversion of petro-dollars to other currencies.

[MC David]

Someone who knows nothing about the new world order yet just discovered the oil industry.