Cheney Arrested....3 Dead?

[Easy Skanking]

Quote:Yes, a disclaimer, how lovely...BUT, I propose the concept that IT STILL COULD BE BOTH! A live Russian news leak, obscured, with built in credibility issues...hey that is brilliant when you think about it.

That news is always the first news...ALWAYS...then Western Media sings their part of the chorus.

Well operating from the same concept, why don't we get all of our info on Conspiracies from the old episodes of The X-Files?

If someone tells you they are a liar, then you are able to prove it, do you believe anything they say?

You might want to read up on the fact that this fictitious Russian, Sorcha Faal, is an American computer programmer named David Booth. Now how likely are Russian security leaks to an American computer geek?

Trust in that? Please.......:nuts:

[SerialExpLain]

Quote:Well operating from the same concept, why don't we get all of our info on Conspiracies from the old episodes of The X-Files?

Don't get ALL of your information from the X-files, but do get some. X-files primed the pump for the TRUTH IS OUT THERE, was that just a coincidence, I don't believe in coincidences.

Quote:If someone tells you they are a liar, then you are able to prove it, do you believe anything they say?

You might want to read up on the fact that this fictitious Russian, Sorcha Faal, is an American computer programmer named David Booth. Now how likely are Russian security leaks to an American computer geek?

Trust in that? Please.......

You get your news from liars everyday, lol. After everything a conspiracy researcher has read, YOU KNOW how duplicitous the world's intelligence agencies are. And I think they are just being duplicitous and clever again in the Sorcha Faal site.

When you operate from the premise that they WANT you to know this information, and not that they do not want you to know this information, and that the information must, at least at this point, deviate from mainstream programming, then the only conclusion is THEY ARE INTERESTED IN THE SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION WHO IS INTERESTED IN THESE SUBVERSIVE TOPICS.

And you are on a list. Ouch, fell into a rabbit hole. Damn, too late, mind as well enjoy the stay. What comes next is bound to be ugly, for me at least, I love Jesus. And THEY SO HATE THAT, lol.

Commies.

[Easy Skanking]

As a conspiracy researcher, I also investigate the source of my info and take that into account when evaluating the data.

For instance, the CIA lies. They would never say they lie. Therefore you have a basis for evaluating the info from them. The info they release can and has been corroborated from other source and then may be evaluated for accuracy and truth. You can see how the track record runs by making comparisons of their info to other sources.

Info from a computer programmer posing as a Russian academian, on a website that states its info is intended in a dramatic fashion and may or may not be based on reality does not even blip on my radar as a valuable information source. Especially when the track record of said site has proved false time and again and has not been corroborated ANYWHERE else that site cannot be taken as anything other than entertainment.

Basically, I'm saying always investigate informations sources. Silliness like the Sorcha Faal junk is nowhere near credible and should not be repeated as accurate news or investigative reporting. It should only be a source of entertainment...but I'd rather watch an old X-Files. LOL

Skinskis's cherry quote is a very applicable metaphor of this situation. Digging thru a huge pile of shit-lies for the one grain of cherry-truth is a waste of time and your intellect when so many more proven avenues of info are out there. Yes. they should be subject to constant re-evaluation, but track records of accuracy goes a long way to being able to find the real stories of current events these days. Why listen to the village idiot to get the town news?

[SerialExpLain]

And Thou Doth Protest Too Much...must be a threat and, again, the site has news that breaks before other sources.

Sites filled with Masons and Gnostics against the NWO of Masons and Gnostics crack me up.

Freemasons and Gnostics against Zionism? Explain that one?

Luciferian Nephilim against NWO...explain that one?

Freemasons against Communism...explain that one?

Antichrists against Antichrist NWO, explain that one?

Secret Societies against NWO rule by the same Secret Societies, explain that one?

Can bash any religion, BUT don't bash the sacred Babylonian Talmud....against NWO...explain that one?

Now lets talk about lies.

Ooh, not saying anything, this thread will get burried.

[Easy Skanking]

I think the bottom line is your definition of "news" is different from mine.
I take mine with fact not fancy.

[SerialExpLain]

The fact is my above post.

Not commenting on that? Why not, some freakin oath of silence perhaps?

[Easy Skanking]

Because I think that all religions are hogwash and not even worth wasting my time on, hence the non-debate on any AntiChrist, Christ or Luciferian BS.

The rest of it, I fail to see how it relates to evaluating sources of news for their validity.

I also have yet to see any actual news being released from that site. Once again, our definitions must differ if you feel there is news coming from there. IMO, it's INFOTAINMENT. LOL

[SerialExpLain]

Oh, yes you fail to SEE.

Open your eyes on this site before you look elsewhere then.

Oh, and if you don't like Masons, Gnostics, Atheism, Secret Societies or Communism you get threats.

Check out Slothy go here, post #37 http://conspiracycentral.info/index.php?sh...=7870&st=20

[Easy Skanking]

Quote:Oh, yes you fail to SEE.

Open your eyes on this site before you look elsewhere then.

Oh, and if you don't like Masons, Gnostics, Atheism, Secret Societies or Communism you get threats.

Check out Slothy go here, post #37 http://conspiracycentral.info/index.php?sh...=7870&st=20

Judgmental, assuming and offtopic.

No wonder our views on accurate news items are different. :retard:

[aaronmann]

it looks like someone DID take a shot at cheney's life in afghanistan yesterday, as fox news is reporting it here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,254823,00.html

[Dr.Druid]

Either way guys I don't see an argument - Am I blind!!!