+- ConCen (http://concen.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Main (/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The Velvet Glove (/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? (/thread-10544.html)
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - commanderson - 02-11-2008 10:23 PM
dunno, but was listening to Webster G Tarpley on Rense the other day, and he was kinda saying people should tactically vote for hillary, now that ron Paul and Kuccinich are gone, was trying some what to soften their crimes too by saying that Bush was the one really behind the Mena opperation,and they didn't really kill vince foster, lesser of a few evils he seems to think, calling both McCain and romney psychopaths, and Obama being Zbigs bitch.
What chaal think of that?
Also this Ron Paul popular uprising thing, seems to have served the same purpose as Howard Dean did last time round, pulling the wieght of disgruntled america, suspicious of the admins role in 9/11 (remember he courted that vote back then too, just before making an arse out of himelf and loosing it all) whereas ron Paul just turned his back on that whole issue at the critical time. Webster pointed this out too, saying his whole populist campaign, pulled recources from the 9/11 truth activism. Controlled opposition anyone? :ouch:
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - Bobert - 02-12-2008 02:34 AM
Tarpley is starting to show his true colors. Anyone voting for Hillary is a complete idiot. The Clinton family has always been in bed with the Bushes since day one, and they are both hardcore crime families. Besides, the election is staged anyways -- it's already been decided that Hillary is going to be the next President. There are no elections at the Presidential level, only selections.
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - commanderson - 02-12-2008 10:36 PM
Yea, I hadn't had a doubt in my mind about Tarpleys allegences, having read his bush bio and synthetic terror, thinking them both exellent, written by someone only concerned with the raw facts, and logical conclusions, backed up by his time served exposing gladio,exec intel reveiw and all that. But now I'm begining to see that along history in this field might just well eqate to a deep throut opperative. I dunno, not ready quite yet ready to cry him shill, just the way he was kinda badgering Jeff,
" do you think the clintons are Murderers?" and jeff would be like
"Yea,Vincefoster, ex-body guards, and others"
"Oh Really, well I don't think anythings proven, Do you think theyre criminals?"
Jeff : "yea for sure, Whitewater etc"
Webster:"Well thats kinda just normal for these politicians, they all do it"
Not word for word but thats the jist, just didnae seem right hearing it from him, wierd, gonna check the latest show, as he's on again already, see whats being said.
By the way, anyone know why Icke's never on rense anymore, have only found one archive show on the site too, those guys fallen out of love?
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - Guest - 02-12-2008 10:53 PM
While I don't think Killary will necessarily be any better or worse than BushKrieg, I do think there's a great posibility that her (s)election will empower and embolden fags, dykes, femenists and any other group that feels downtrodden.
IOW, I don't think much will change on the geo-political stage, it will have it's greatest effect sociologically on society.
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - commanderson - 02-13-2008 12:06 AM
I reckon its good for our argument, that all this stuff decided before hand, and democracy is a non existant farce, when you can look over the last two decades presidents and see Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton, suckitup flat earthers, the world is round!
But I reckon Hillarys gonna go deeper into Global Warfare, watch out for Thatcher on PCP, its like the Bush 1's wimp factor thing where the press goaded him to war, Hillary will have a similar leniancy with the public to be more aggressive.
Watch your arse Iran.
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - Bobert - 02-13-2008 12:23 AM
Quote:I reckon its good for our argument, that all this stuff decided before hand, and democracy is a non existant farce, when you can look over the last two decades presidents and see Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton, suckitup flat earthers, the world is round!
But I reckon Hillarys gonna go deeper into Global Warfare, watch out for Thatcher on PCP, its like the Bush 1's wimp factor thing where the press goaded him to war, Hillary will have a similar leniancy with the public to be more aggressive.
Watch your arse Iran.
That's what I'm afraid of -- Thatcher on PCP. There's something about Hillary that chills me to the bone.
I think your right about the wimp factor. She'll probably act docile for the first few months in office, then we'll all wake up one day and boom! war is on with Iran.
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - burtlancast - 02-13-2008 12:27 AM
Paul is the only true candidate.
Who cares if he can't win ?
Why beat the drums he can't win ?
Tarpley is kinda fishy, just like Michael Moore, the glorified anti war candidate, who couldn't bring himself to pronounce " Paul" if his life was dependent on it.
I wish so much somebody challenged Moore on his silence about Paul.
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - commanderson - 02-13-2008 12:39 AM
If Ron Paul, was to run as an independant, I'd overlook the 9/11 dis, and if he hit 9/11 head on I'd over look him not running, he did both though!
Still not quite ready to put Tarpley in the same box as Moore though, but maybe Moore's just Tarpley for dummies!
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - Guest - 02-13-2008 01:41 AM
I wonder why he wouldn't tackle 9-11 head on. When polls suggest nearly HALF of americans think 9-11 is bullshit, how much more support could he want?
IOW, if I was a registered Dem, and all the dems were hogwash on 911, I'd vote for paul.
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - burtlancast - 02-13-2008 11:52 PM
Quote:I wonder why he wouldn't tackle 9-11 head on. When polls suggest nearly HALF of americans think 9-11 is bullshit, how much more support could he want?
IOW, if I was a registered Dem, and all the dems were hogwash on 911, I'd vote for paul.
Paul brought up on multiple occasions his intent on prosecuting the people responsable for the misleading intelligence that brought the Iraq war.
AS far as 911, i think he knows fully well it equates to political suicide. The media would forget his earlier messages of true conservatism and pounce the 911 issue into oblivion.
The consequences in time would be too difficult to asses.
I doubt, up to this point, 911 can be used as a political message ( saddly). Not enough clear supporters of 911 truth around.
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - rsol - 02-15-2008 01:12 AM
plus half filled glass is also half empty. he avoided alienating all those 50% who are not all together sure.. I wonder what would happen if AJ ran for pres. Is it too late to register?
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - blove8. - 02-15-2008 01:23 AM
ya'll speak as if the election has some merit. haven't ya learned yet?
Tarpley for Clinton? Ron Paul the new Howard Dean? - NtCkEr - 02-15-2008 02:43 AM
george carlin on voting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u6lCBnRoHQ