ConCen

This PDF Document is a 60 page outline of Hypnosis and NLP techniques that one can recognize from Obama's speeches. I have been studying the works of Richard Bandler for a couple of years and I know some of you are even experts on this stuff. The document goes over some very basics of Hypnosis and NLP so it should work for people who are new to the subject.
Check this out. A few examples:

Quote:Basics of Obama’s pacing and leading: The “because we need change, that is why I should be your next president” argument

Building on this basic framework, you do not hear specifics largely because much of Obama’s entire presentation is pacing the audience. Obama’s sentence structure is often exactly what is taught by Erickson
in ways that cannot be coincidence. If he went into specifics, he would not be pacing, he would be encouraging the use of the conscious mind, something he is attempting to avoid. Obama’s entire campaign,
essentially, can be summarized as:

1. The economy is bad, or the country is going in the wrong direction (pace) or we need to get an education for every child (whatever statements no one can disagree with (pace) and therefore creates a “yes-yes-yes” response, or “yes room.”)
2. Change (can be used as a pace, an anchor, and/or a preprogrammed response)
3. And or because or that is why (conjunction linking statement)65
4. I will be your next President. (subconscious lead)

This is awesome. I'm sorry but this is ingenious. You ever wondered why Obama never gets into the specifics of what he's going to do? Well, vagueness is one of the key components of Hypnosis (and also of Seduction, if you ever studied that)

Quote:See the analysis below of Obama’s Denver
Democratic National Convention 2008 speech in which he uses this command as he is programming the
audience to vote for him on “November 4th.”

*Obama’s hypnotic command that “a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon
you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, ‘I have to vote for
Barack’”

YOU WILL SAY TO YOURSELF "I HAVE TO VOTE FOR OBAMA". Classic hypnotic commands. The list goes on and on.

Get the document here and look at it. Everyone who has ever been in contact with Hypnosis and NLP will download this document and say to yourself "I will hand over my wallet to Hans". Just kidding.

You found this on Infowars? Im just wondering...because...
I just created a thread on another site yesterday that talked about this. I posted it because I actually was looking to see if there were any NLP connections with Obama, and when I did see them I wanted to see the reaction of some Obama supporters.
I'll just repost it here, I was thinking about re-posting the thread on ConCen anyway but I guess Ill just post it in here since you beat me to it...

Quote:OBAMA & NLP<!--fontc--><!--/fontc-->



Im not sure how many of you are aware of NLP...
Neuro-linguistic programming and its uses, combined with persuasion and hypnosis/conditioning are pretty well documented.

I always heard a distinct pattern or cadence when Obama speaks, or him stressing certain words - but I never thought much about it until recently. Hearing what people think about him, I see how it fits so I thought it might be something worth looking into. I started digging around.

I had read up on NLP a while ago and knowing what it is, I sometimes catch people using it, in radio/TV adds, speeches, especially some TV preachers, and those late night infomercials.

On the wiki page for NLP, it says:

Quote:Anthony Robbins saw success marketing his self-help programs using infomercials. Personal Power, one of Robbins self-help audio programs launched in 1989 has sold in excess of US $100 million.[80] Previously Robbins had published Unlimited Power[81], an American best seller based largely on NLP. While Robbins incorporated some aspects of NLP in what he called Neuro Associative Conditioning and later programs, NLP was mentioned less often.

And on his wiki page it shows:

Quote:Anthony Robbins (born Anthony J. Mahavick February 29, 1960) is an American self-help writer, professional speaker and occasional actor. He became well known through the use of firewalking in his seminars. He initially studied Neuro-Linguistic Programming but went on to develop his own methods.

This article, critical of Obama reports: "He is reportedly Tony Robbins trained, not a bad thing in itself, yet I personally believe he isn't using that training consistently as intended. It can be highly manipulative."

Looking further I found this other 67 page paper on someone's own research into Obama's use of NLP and hypnotic suggestion.

I dont agree with all the points that are made in it but, understanding NLP, I do see where some of the stuff, if not most of it, is spot on:

Quote:This document contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis proving Barack Obama’s use of a little-known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know.

Barack Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes.

http://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama%27s_Use_...is_Speeches.pdf

I know most of you might not read all of it but its worth skimming, if not at least look into NLP. Thats some pretty manipulative sh*t, and used a lot more than most realize.

Wow, this thread is number 5 on google if you search for "Obama NLP". That's impressive.

This information is being spread around wildly. I have people on myspace sending me this.

I will own all your herbs. Please smoke it all before I come....

I'll testify to this NLP and Obama stuff. It's not something I readily want to do. Nobody wants to admit they were brainwashed.

A couple of months ago I watched a lot of pre-election coverage on television due to lack of internet. (I hate TV)
I remember watching a debate between McSame and Obamalamadingdong, I think it was the final debate but I'm not sure.

I didn't particularly like either candidate. McSame seemed to be just another neo-kook to me and Obama as a Bzerzisnki redux.

While I was opposed Obama's policies and was wary of his shady connections I found myself slowly getting the feeling that I was begining to like the
man as a man and not as a politician.

I kid you not, I had a really strange thought enter my head... "Mike, why do you find yourself liking this guy when you despise all he stands for?".
I'm not lying I actually asked myself that.

When I first read about NLP is was in regards to Obama, and it all began to make sense.

Does Obama use neural linguistic programming? I think so and feel victimized by it.

The funny thing is, from all I know about NLP and hypnosis, it will still work, even when you know exactly what they're doing and how. So there is really no protection against it.

Btw. I recommend listening to a couple of hours of Richard Bandler talking. Very insightful about NLP and all that is there.

Yes he does use NLP and other linguistic patterns which are used to influence people.
This isnt new. Just about every politician is trained to use it, Ericksonian language patterns, the yes set, double binds etc etc.
Its no different to what your local car salesman uses.

I am practitioner trained in NLP, used to coach people on master practitioner courses and am a registered hypnotherapist. I incorporate NLP and language patterns into lots of training I do for the corporate market, its a primary tool in all selling contexts and in management training.


Dont be afraid of it. Learn it and youll know how easy you can be manipulated and youll recognise when someone is using it in a negative or manipulative way.
And once you recognise it, you will not succumb to it. eg When I meet salespeople I piss them off by not responding in the way they have been taught to expect. alternatively it is fun to tell them exactly what they are doing and disarm them

It also has a good side, its used in therapy settings so dont blame the technology, blame the person using it.

PS Bandler is a freaking nut job, he lost the plot years ago and is just driven by cash.
Better models are Ian McDermott or Robert Dilts

Quote:PS Bandler is a freaking nut job, he lost the plot years ago and is just driven by cash.
Better models are Ian McDermott or Robert Dilts

Know of any talks or lectures about it by these guys? Something to share?

Quote:The funny thing is, from all I know about NLP and hypnosis, it will still work, even when you know exactly what they're doing and how. So there is really no protection against it.

I disagree. Once your gaurd is up your critically thinking conscious filters everything.

ctrl yea i have to agree. i myself still had a small bit of hope that he was genunine. But when considering his funding and other information you can only but be amazed at the quality of co intel pro they brought forward. going from bush, who was a terrible public speaker, to say the least, to someone like obama is a complete change on the way they put forward the president. they did have 8 years to organise the perfect candidate. but it is likely that alot of effort went into finding the right person. we can see from now on that the elections will never appear to be corrupt again and the candidate of choice will be very well liked.

i personally chose not to be read that document on NLP as i did listen to the finer print within that document that headed a warning. A warning that i decided to listen to.

but i did save it to my HD and at some point will have a full read of the document.

Quote:

Quote:The funny thing is, from all I know about NLP and hypnosis, it will still work, even when you know exactly what they're doing and how. So there is really no protection against it.

I disagree. Once your gaurd is up your critically thinking conscious filters everything.

Agreed. Being familiar with what you're looking for also means the conscious mind needs to spend less time on decrypting the the attacks on the sub-conscious, which is also important imo.

Demonoid has some very good torrents under the search 'nlp'

Quote:

Quote:The funny thing is, from all I know about NLP and hypnosis, it will still work, even when you know exactly what they're doing and how. So there is really no protection against it.

I disagree. Once your gaurd is up your critically thinking conscious filters everything.

Watch Richard Bandler talk, that's all I'm asking. Of course he is driven by money, you hear that argument is brought up frequently against anybody. Yes, he is a fucking nutjob. That's why I recommend him.

About Richard Bandler. Seriously, stay away from that guy, do not promote him, do not listen to him and most definitely do not watch him. I strongly feel by evidence that came my way that Bandler employs his masterful use of NLP on the audience/listener in his lectures. His presentations are circulated widely and fairly freely on the web for a reason. He has a strong deny-God theme going on in them among other things.

---

More recent examples of Obama's use of NLP here.

http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/does-o...u-decide-1

I had similar feelings to some of the posters on this thread, insofar as I thought, 'hey, at least this guy can speak better than Bush and it's getting people to think positively!'

I was taken in until I saw the Obama Deception a-la Alex Jones showing how he's gone back on everything he said. But then I wondered, how could this docu be put together in so short a time if not scheduled to enforce the bicameralism in politics and mental states of everyone paying any attention to America?

I think much if not most media is regulated in this manner.

Also, anyone here familiar with Freeman? (blue fly productions, has a couple radio shows and blogs and videos and such) He plays the 'Yes we can' motto backwards and it sounds eerily similar to 'thank you satan'... any thoughts? Is this a blatant example of subconscious NLP?

Peace...