ConCen

A Preface:

First and foremost, for all who read this, understand that the intentions behind what is about to be presented is by no means a complete comprehensive compilation of data, but nonetheless took a decent amount of time to prepare, and should be enough for one to continue their own studies in the subject matter should they desire. With that said, I would appreciate it if you would read the entire post before criticising it, as I am sure I shall receive criticism for what follows. Criticism is good, but should be informed and not based out of ignorance. Take from the following what you desire, or reject it all together, the choice is for you to make. All the following is compiled by myself.

Also, while this does involve a bit of religion, the basis of this thread is the history behind the Tetragrammaton, and not a sermon. Therefore, viewed in that aspect, it seems to more suitably belong in history rather than religion, but I digress.

Masonry is Luciferian:

"That which we must say to a crowd is - We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay whose deeds prove his cruelty, perdify and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil."
-Albert Pike, 33° Grand Mason, Page 558, Instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the World, July 14, 1889. Recorded by A.C. De La Rive in La Femme et l'Enfant dans la FrancMaconnerie Universelle.



Albert Pike was a 33° Mason, founder of the KKK, and one of the most prominent Freemasons to exist. In his book Morals and Dogma, he states:

"Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the son of the morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!"
-Morals and Dogma page 321.

Manly Palmer Hall, 33° Mason, wrote a well known book titled “The Secret Teachings of All Ages”, in which Hall claims:

"I hereby promise the Great Spirit Lucifuge, Prince of Demons, that each year I will bring unto him a human soul to do with as it may please him, and in return Lucifuge promises to bestow upon me the treasures of the earth and fulfill my every desire for the length of my natural life. If I fail to bring him each year the offering specified above, then my own soul shall be forfeit to him. Signed..... { Invocant signs pact with his own blood }”
-The Secret Teaching Of All Ages, page CIV.

However, that was not his only book, as he published over 150 other works, including “The Lost Keys of Freemasonry”. In it, he states:

"When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy."
-The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Page 48.

A pattern seems to be occurring, in which high level Freemasons glorify “Lucifer, the Light-Bearer”. Bringing us to Arthur Edward Waite, 33° Mason as well, who requests:

"First Conjuration Addressed to Emperor Lucifer. Emperor Lucifer, Master and Prince of Rebellious Spirits, I adjure thee to leave thine abode, in what-ever quarter of the world it may be situated and come hither to communicate with me. I command and I conjure thee in the Name of the Mighty Living God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, to appear without noise and without ...."
-The Book of Black Magic and of Pacts, page 244.

Eliphas Levi, whom Alester Crowley said he was the reincarnation thereof, was a high level Mason. Eliphas actually drew the Sabbatic Goat that came later to be associated with the word “Baphomet”. Some of his books were translated by Waite, mentioned above. An excerpt of The Mysteries of Magic is as follows:

"What is more absurd and more impious than to attribute the name of Lucifer to the devil, that is, to personified evil. The intellectual Lucifer is the spirit of intelligence and love; it is the paraclete, it is the Holy Spirit, while the physical Lucifer is the great agent of universal magnetism."
-The Mysteries of Magic, page 428.

The quotes referenced above are few, but by no means limited. There is an abundant wealth of information similar to what is above, and what I have taken out is, as it is said, “a drop in the ocean”. What is evident is that the top degrees of Masonry worship Lucifer, whom is Satan. This point is very important to emphasise. To signify that the people at the top of the Masonic pyramid, collectively known as the Illuminati, worship Satan, is to insinuate that the powers that be who rule this world do so under the hand of Satan himself. Whether real or not, the “Illuminated Ones” believe such a being is real, and worship him religiously. Religiously does not even begin to portray their dedication. They obsessively cling to all that is Satan, and exalt him as the Grand Architect of the Universe, subjecting everyone underneath their rule to every whim of their, and by an extension of them, Satan’s desires. Everything they do, from their ceremonies, to the dates they hold events (an example is Hitler committing “suicide” on May 1, the same day the Illuminati were officially founded by Adam Weishaupt), to even what they wear. They fanatically embrace the doctrine of Lucifer, and subject everyone they can to its powers. We see it everywhere. They KNOW Satan is real, and desire to force him on all of us. They do so through media, through politics, contemporary education, general propaganda, religion, and non-religious holidays. An example would be Mother’s Day, which is celebration of Semiramis, whom birthed Tammuz, reincarnation of Nimrod, the original sun god, which is Satan.
It is not just the high level Masons that get tricked, just look at this video:





It is also not just Masons that get tricked, and that is the purpose for this compilation of data. It is you. They spew lies in all directions, in hopes that some will eventually consume some of them. This is one of their biggest lies, and many people directly praise Satan himself without knowing. It is the lies of the Tetragrammaton.

Masoretes, Part I:

After the fall of Biblical Israel, their texts remained behind, while they were exiled and taken captive. These texts remained fairly intact, and were not tampered with until a group came along. This group was called the Masoretes, and they existed for a few centuries as scribes translating the Hebrew texts as well as “fixing” grammatical errors. This Wikipedia article even states some of the purposes of their “editing”:
• Removal of unseemly expressions used in reference to God; e.g., the substitution of ("to bless") for ("to curse") in certain passages.
• Safeguarding of the Tetragrammaton; e.g. substitution of "Elohim" for "YHVH" in some passages.
• Removal of application of the names of pagan gods, e.g. the change of the name "Ishbaal" to "Ishbosheth."
• Safeguarding the unity of divine worship at Jerusalem.
Now, one may not think it is such a bad thing for the Masoretes to translate their own documents, as well as “correct” them. After all, they are their documents….. Right? Obviously they have to be the real Jews spoken of in the Bible, because… well… everyone knows they are. They are Jews no doubt, but the question is, “Is a Jew a Hebrew?”

Types of Jews:

Essentially, there are two types of Jews, which are Khazarian and Ashkenazi. There are a few more, but they are not recognised, such as Ethiopian Jews. Let’s get started.

Ashkenazi Jews come from a land called Rhineland, which bordered the river Rhine, adjacent to Germany and south of the Netherlands.



The people that inhabited this land were of the Celtic tribes, but influenced by the Germanic and Frankish tribes. Germany later captured Rhineland. Now, where did these people come from? These people claim to be the people spoke of in Scripture, so let Scripture speak for itself. According to Genesis 10, Noah had 3 sons; Ham, Shem, and Japheth.

10 Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.
2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

Out of Japheth came seven sons, who each later founded a nation. His sons were Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Mesech, and Tiras. The nations created from them are, respectfully, the Armenians, Lydians, Medes, Greeks, Tibarenians, Moschians, and Tiras. Now, Gomer settled in west Asia, which is right near what is Europe. His sons were Ashkenaz, Riphath and Togarmah. Ashkenaz went west and later his descendants, along with his brothers, settled in what is now Europe. Ashkenaz was predominantly in Rhineland, while other factions formed other empires and peoples. Sticking with this makes all Ashkenazi Jews then unable to be the chosen people, as they did not even descend from Shem! These Jews are not Biblical Hebrews, then, but simply Jews. They are the people we see very commonly as the heads of Masonic structures and the people on the top. Almost all Jewish powers that rule today come from Ashkenaz.

Now, for Khazars. Khazar Jews come from a land called Khazaria, which was located in what is now Eastern Turkey. This was where Gomer originally settled, and Gomer’s son Togarmah was the founder of Khazaria. King Joseph had stated his lineage to King Hasdai of Moorish Spain:

You ask us also in your epistle: "Of what people, of what family, and of what tribe are you?" Know that we are descended from Japheth, through his son Togarmah. [In Jewish literature Togarmah is the father of all the Turks.] I have found in the genealogical books of my ancestors that Togarmah had ten sons. These are their names: the eldest was Ujur, the second Tauris, the third Avar, the fourth Uauz, the fifth Bizal, the sixth Tarna, the seventh Khazar, the eighth Janur, the ninth Bulgar, the tenth Sawir. [These are the mythical founders of tribes that once lived in the neighborhood of the Black and Caspian Seas.] I am a descendant of Khazar, the seventh son.



While the technicalities are not known, what is knows is that between 700-800 AD, Khazaria had a conversion of, at least, the richer classes into Judaism, and exalted themselves as the authorities of all that is Jew. They traveled much before, but when their empire finally collapsed, ~1000, they dispersed greatly. Many went into Byzantine, while others went into Islamic areas, and yet still some aided in the founding of Hungary. Seeing as a large number went to Byzantine, they were very close to what was Judea, and quite a few settled there. Thus, the origin of Khazarian Jews has no premise, as Khazars were also from Gomer, not even from Shem. Even Scripture itself supports this notion.

Revelation 2:8-9:

8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive;
9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.





Smyrna is located in what was Byzantium, fairly close to the capital city of Constantinople. Nicea is north of Smyrna, and is the location where the Council of Nicea decided which books were Canon and which ones were not. These are the people who, under Constantine himself, created what is now called Roman Catholicism. This Council integrated Paganism with what was the true following of Christ by the real people. The point is these Khazars are not Hebrews, they are Jews, imposters claiming to be Hebrews but are not, but worship Satan. These Jews are of the seed of Japheth, and not from Shem, and definitely not from Jacob.

Karaite Judaism:

Anan ben David was a major founder of the Karaite Judaism, which is the same group that, you guessed it, most of the Masoretes came from! Anan ben David, whose name was Anan ben Shafat, but was changed for purported lineage from King David, could never verify his alleged connection with David. According to story, either he or his followers declared him the next exilarch, after the current one had died. When the Islamic government of Babylon (which became Iraq) found out (they had control of Israel during this time), they considered it an act of treason, as they had picked someone else. Anan was thrown in prison, and set to be executed, where he met Abu Hanifa, who founded a prominent Muslim school, and gave Anan advice that saved his life. He later settled in Palestine and expanded, with a strong presence in Jerusalem, which was around the time the Masoretes gained power and began their works.

Masoretes Part II:

Now that it has been established that the Masoretes were not from the original Hebrew population, but rather imposters from Europe and Eurasia, all descendant from Gomer, the rest can be put into perspective. Their purpose was to hide the history of the real Hebrews, so that they may be the chosen people. And they were successful, as they were chosen. As the Most High God of Israel had chose a people, Satan did too, he chose Jews, specifically Ashkenazi. He chose them and gave them the world, so long as they do his desire and work for him. These imposters set themselves up to be the real Hebrews, and establish their god (Satan) as the God of the Bible. One of the many ways they did this was by going through ancient Hebrew texts and “revising” them, while changing the Name to the Tetragrammaton, which is Satanic.

The Tetragrammaton:

The Tetragrammaton is considered to be the Name of the God of the Bible. While it was “lost” for a while (unknown by most for a large amount of time), in recent history the Tetragrammaton has gained popularity, mostly due to the founding of the Jehovah’s Witness church.
The founder of Jehovah’s Witness, Charles Taze Russell, was an interesting character in history. While debate exists as to whether Russell was truly a Mason or not, he held the Masons in high regard. One look at his grave…



…clearly shows the symbol of the Knights’ Templar…



… as well as all the other symbolism, such as a pyramid, the olive branches, the aforementioned cross and crown symbol, as well as others. Of course, one can always claim that he was dead when they put that grave there. How about this? This is a picture of his monthly letter, and remained the picture for quite some time, not until a while after his death was it changed.



Note the Masonic features in it, such as 3 lightning bolts, the same cross and crown mentioned before, surrounded with olive branches, as well as others. Pictures of some of his other books, such as the Divine Plan for All Ages, show winged sun disks, pyramids, all-seeing eyes, and so on. This is the guy who popularized the Tetragrammaton, and brought it into modern view. To sum it up, I shall use the words of Albert Pike yet again:

“Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion.”
-Morals & Dogma, page 213.

What are the origins of the Tetragrammaton? Where did it originate from? Numerous sources mention it, such as the Jewish Magical Papyri, Dead Sea Scrolls, and, though refuted, some claim the Aramaic Papyri. The Mesopotamian Texts, which were around before the other texts mentioned, and during the Persia Babylonia era of the Mesopotamia region, which was when the Hebrews went into captivity, according to Scripture, had no mention of the Tetragrammaton. The Aramaic Papyri do not have a strong foundation for the Tetragrammaton, leaving us with the Dead Sea Scrolls and Jewish Magical Papyri.

The Dead Sea Scrolls were written throughout a long period of time, and consolidated to numerous caves in the wadi Qumron. The two potentially oldest artifacts they recovered were pieces of linen and leather, which would date to 390 BCE and 197 BCE respectively at their oldest. The potentially oldest documents they found were two partial copies of Isaiah, called 1QIsaiah. They can date back to 351 BCE. They can also date to 53 BCE. These scrolls are said to be written by a group called the Essenes. The Essenes, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, were a group of Pharisees, and regarded by King Herod as “endowed with higher powers”. According to Jewish Encyclopedia:

The Masonic writers, Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, are part of a great campaign to legitimize the Dead Sea Scrolls as the true scriptures and the Essenes as the rightful priesthood of Israel (based on personal sanctity rather than lineage). They further misrepresent Jesus and John the Baptist as high-ranking Essenes and the Qumran Community as the original Jerusalem Church:

“That the authors of the Dead Sea Scrolls, who we know call the Qumran Community, were Essenes is now beyond doubt; and that these people were the Nasoreans or the original Jerusalem Church…
“To us it seems inescapable that the man who was Jesus the Christ must have been a leading Qumranian figure during the crucial years of the third and fourth decades of the first century. The community’s numbers were tiny at that time, possibly no more than two hundred people, and perhaps there were little more than around four thousand Essenes in total. They…saw imminent salvation from their problems through holiness and, although they were not hereditary priests, through living a monastic existence. This involved a society that was extremely hierarchical, from the Guardian or Grand Master downwards…
“Initiation into the higher echelons required vows of secrecy that carried threat of horrible punishments should the secrets of the brotherhood be revealed to the outside world. This sounds like a highly Masonic practice… They wore white robes, took vows of poverty, swore to secrecy under threat of terrible punishment and claimed to possess secret knowledge…
“Finally the imagination of Ezekiel establishes the rules for the priesthood that would become the landmarks of the Essenes of Qumran. The legitimate priests of the sanctuary are to be the sons of Zadok, the erstwhile chief priest. Known to the people of Qumran as Zadokites, these sons of Zadok would wear white linen garments when they entered the inner court.” (The Hiram Key, pp. 54-58, 181)

The Essenes also were Kabala worshipers. According, again, to Jewish Encyclopedia (which is written for those we call Jewish today):

Closely connected herewith is the doctrine that the pious are enabled to ascend toward God even in this life, if they know how to free themselves from the trammels that bind the soul to the body (see Ascension). Thus were the first mystics enabled to disclose the mysteries of the world beyond. According to Anz, l.c., and Bousset, "Die Himmelreise der Seele," in "Archiv für Religionswissenschaft," iv. 136 et seq., the central doctrine of Gnosticism—a movement closely connected with Jewish mysticism—was nothing else than the attempt to liberate the soul and unite it with God. This conception explains the great prominence of angels and spirits in both the earlier and the later Jewish mysticism. Through the employment of mysteries, incantations, names of angels, etc., the mystic assures for himself the passage to God, and learns the holy words and formulas with which he overpowers the evil spirits that try to thwart and destroy him. Gaining thereby the mastery over them, he naturally wishes to exercise it even while still on earth, and tries to make the spirits serviceable to him. So, too, were the Essenes familiar with the idea of the journey to heaven (see Bousset, l.c. p. 143, explaining Josephus, "Ant." xviii. 1, § 5); and they were also masters of angelology. The practise of magic and incantation, the angelology and demonology, were borrowed from Babylonia, Persia, and Egypt; but these foreign elements were Judaized in the process, and took the form of the mystical adoration of the name of God and of speculations regarding the mysterious power of the Hebrew alphabet (see Ber. 55a; compare Pesiḳ. R. 21 [ed. Friedmann, p. 109a], "the name of God creates and destroys worlds"), to become, finally, foundations of the philosophy of the "Sefer Yeẓirah."

So, the Essenes were practicing magic, angelology, demonology, and incantation. Wikipedia says incantation is to chant or to cast a spell, usually done in rituals and when practicing magic. They practiced magic, cast spells, as well as studied angelology and demonology. When Satan fell from heaven, he took 1/3 of the angels with him, and they became known as “fallen angels”.

Revelation 12:3-9:

3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

Scriptures are very clear that all wizards are bad, and we “…shalt not suffer a witch to live.” (Exodus 22:18). Another example is King Manasseh in 2 Chronicles 33:

33 Manasseh was twelve years old when he began to reign, and he reigned fifty and five years in Jerusalem:
2 But did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, like unto the abominations of the heathen, whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel.
3 For he built again the high places which Hezekiah his father had broken down, and he reared up altars for Baalim, and made groves, and worshipped all the host of heaven, and served them.
4 Also he built altars in the house of the LORD, whereof the LORD had said, In Jerusalem shall my name be for ever.
5 And he built altars for all the host of heaven in the two courts of the house of the LORD.
6 And he caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom: also he observed times, and used enchantments, and used witchcraft, and dealt with a familiar spirit, and with wizards: he wrought much evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger.

Note how verse 6 says “dealt with familiar spirits”. To deal with “familiar spirits” is to deal with demons, and to invite them into yourself. One must have demons to practice magic. Josephus, who had firsthand experience as a historian, stated the Essenes practiced magic and incantation, which is chanting, all while studying angels and demons. 2 Corinthians 11:14 clearly says “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.” Could it be these “angels” the Essenes were worshiping were fallen, and simply pretended to be angels of light? Most likely so, as they were with the Pharisees, though separated by their rigidity, and Christ disliked the Pharisees greatly. These Essenes were extremely prominent around 200 BCE – 100 CE, which is around the time the Dead Sea Scrolls are written. Could such a group, practicing blasphemies worthy of death under the Law make something so pure and true? Or could they have put in the name the demons gave them?

Now, the Jewish Magical Papyri. Again, these Jews in Egypt were practicing magic, incantations, and angelology. They were prominent from 300-500 CE, and followed the destruction of the second Temple, and the Roman invasion of Judea. Now note, Rome had invaded Judea and made it a vassal ~100 BCE, while fully occupying it ~60 BCE, and destroying Jerusalem ~70 CE. Most of the population was killed or enslaved after the destruction of Jerusalem. When Rome did this, most of the old information, kept in Jerusalem, was destroyed. Rome had already attracted quite a few Ashkenazi, whom already had established numerous trade guilds, such as the German Confederation, and were developing banks and centers of commerce (as is to this day). Back to topic, these people who wrote the Papyri, certainly were not following Scripture but rather pagan practices. They also called heavily on YHWH, and their papers are used as a reference for the Tetragrammaton.
So here we have two groups, separated by distance and time, performing the same practices and calling the same god. The question should then be, “Who is YHWH?” According to Strong’s Concordance, H3050 states:

“Yahh yaw contraction for 3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name:--Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Compare names in ‘-iah,’ ‘- jah.’”

And H3068 states:

“Yhovah yeh-ho-vaw' from 1961; (the) self-Existent or Eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God:--Jehovah, the Lord. Compare 3050, 3069.”

H1942 claims:

“Havvah hav-vaw' from 1933 (in the sense of eagerly coveting and rushing upon; by implication, of falling); desire; also ruin:--calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous (thing), naughtiness, naughty, noisome, perverse thing, substance, very wickedness.”

So Jah or Yah, הי, which is “self-existent; eternal” is the name of the JEWISH god. Havah, הו, being “coveting, wickedness”, is the latter part of the name. Together, we get Jah-havah, or Jehovah, הוהי. Remember, Hebrew is read right to left. Jehovah, Yahweh, and all other 72 names of God are all derived from the Tetragrammaton. Apparently the names are "technology for the soul".



H1180, still drawing from Strong’s Concordance, states:

“Ba`aliy bah-al-ee' from 1167 with pron. suff.; my master; Baali, a symbolical name for Jehovah:--Baali.”

Hosea 2:16-17:

16 And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.
17 For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name.

H3467:

“Yasha` yaw-shah' a primitive root; properly, to be open, wide or free, i.e. (by implication) to be safe; causatively, to free or succor:--X at all, avenging, defend, deliver(-er), help, preserve, rescue, be safe, bring (having) salvation, save(-iour), get victory.”

H3468:

“Yesha` yeh'-shah or yeshai {yay'-shah}; from 3467; liberty, deliverance, prosperity:--safety, salvation, saving.”

Ba’alim is plural of Ba’al, the deity of the Canaanites, who was equated with Satan himself, thus Ba’alim means “devils”, which means false gods. The word Ba’ali simply means master, which is why it was to be Ishi, and not Ba’ali, as people were using Ba’ali to go to pagan gods. Ishi is derived from Yasha, meaning savior or deliverer or safety. Where have I heard that before?

Matthew 1:21:

21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

So the meaning of Christ’s name is Savior, so they call him… Jesus?

Proverbs 30:4:

4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? Who hath gathered the wind in his fists? Who hath bound the waters in a garment? Who hath established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou canst tell?

Can you tell?

Jeremiah 23:27:

27 Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.

So we have people praying to Jehovah, the eternal god of wickedness and coveting, and Jesus… What is Jesus?

The history of J shows that J has not existed until after 1450, and was not used much until after 1634. The name “Jesus” in Greek was Iosous. It was translated from the Hebrew “Yeshua” or “Yehosuha”, the latter is the long version of the former. Yehoshua is a combination of Yehovah/Jehovah and yasha, coming to mean Yahwew/Jehovah saves. But if Jehovah is actually Satan, and the Tetragrammaton is a Satanic instrument, are they saying “Satan saves” when they say “Jesus”?

The name הוהי (Jehovah), breaks down in the Kabala into four worlds. Each letter correlates with one world in the Kabala’s four worlds of existence. The Yod, י, correlates with Atziluth, which is the highest world, and the one of causes. Each Sephiroth of the world is associated with, you guessed it, one of the many Tetragrammaton names of God. The Heh, ה, is associated with Beri’ah. Beri’ah is the World of Creation. The Vev, ו, with Yetzirah, which is the World of Formation, ruled in theory by Metatron. Metatron is only mentioned in the Talmud and Kabala predominantly, but is also mentioned in a few other Jewish (not Hebrew) magical texts. The second and last Heh, ה, is associated with Assiah, the World of Action. Note that each of these worlds correlate with a Tarot card, the same cards fortune tellers, spiritualists, and magi use. Look through these cards, and see the symbolism wroth in them. The top symbol for these occults, though, is the six-pointed Star of Moloch, a cow-headed (remember the calf?) deity of child sacrifice. This star is now called the Star of David, even though David had no star. This is the same Moloch the “elite” worship at Bohemian Grove. Now, while Yahweh is a high up occult name, which is Jehovah, which is god of wickedness, it is not the most important. Remember the Albert pike quote at the very start of this? “…that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees…” What happens on the 33rd degree? They reveal a name more important, and far more secret than Yahweh, the very name Satan chose for himself.

Jahbulon:



Jahbulon is Jahovah, and is revealed to be the name Satan chose for himself. This name breaks down into three parts:

Jah – Jahovah.

Bul - Ba’al, particularly the god of Canaanites, Ba’al Zebub.

On – Osiris god of the dead.

Interestingly, when one does a Google Image of Ba’al, the first image is the same as when you search for Jahbulon.



Conclusion:
So, hopefully the information provided will be enough to provoke some to studying the information provided and expounding on it. YHWH is Satan, Jehovah is Satan, Jahbulon is Satan, all of whom the powers that be praise and religiously cling to. But, one may be left wondering, what,, then. Is God’s name? Easy.

Exodus 3:13-15:

13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? What shall I say unto them?
14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.
15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, the LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.

“This is My Name forever…” about sums it up. I Am That I Am in Hebrew would be Ahayah Asher Ahayah. And as for Christ, it is not Yeshua, or Yehoshua, which is “Jehovah saves”, but rather Yashaya – Savior. Hopefully you enjoyed, and thank you for reading.

---

And here is a link to a torrent I uploaded covering the Tetragrammaton:
http://concen.org/tracker/torrents-details.php?id=29729

What a load of nonsense!

Cherry-picked, out-of-context "quotes" and a fabricated hoax (Pike's "Lucifer is god" and "WWIII" letters are posthumous fabrications).

Your post is entirely bullshit, I'm afraid. Sorry. I'm sure you spent a lot of time copy & pasting it, but not any time at all checking the veracity of what you were repeating.

Back to the drawing board, eh? Or, rather, you'll most likely ignore what I say in favour of your prejudices.

Good luck with that.

(EDITED to provide above link)

MAsonRY

The people in control are all for the "Most High God of Israel", don't think otherwise for a second. And if you're for this as well you're an enemy to the truth, to me and to the human race.

(06-24-2012 05:08 AM)jasonmac Wrote: [ -> ]The people in control are all for the "Most High God of Israel", don't think otherwise for a second. And if you're for this as well you're an enemy to the truth, to me and to the human race.

If you believe a word you say, then you are an enemy of the truth and of mankind. Let me post a question to you... If they really worship the God of the Bible, then why do they do everything that Scripture says NOT to do?

was the OP from a single source, or was this your research?

This was all my research, compiled over multiple hours. It took quite a substantial amount of time to compile, but I am glad it is finished. No plagiarism here.

Nope. Not even a little bit.

Anarchist, this is a ton of information. You've spent a lot of time assembling it. Your thesis that YHWH is the adversary is intriguing.

Here's my critique of your essay:

It's too long. I got lost in all the quotes. The style of nineteenth century authors is often flowery, archaic, and difficult to wade through. I think you have too many quotes. I got lost trying to digest them. Less is sometimes more.

Early on you say "What is evident is that the top degrees of Masonry worship Lucifer, whom is Satan". I'm not sure that is true. My understanding is that Satan (the adversary) and Lucifer (the light bringer) are actually two different things. I need to investigate that more.

What you are doing is called an Expository Essay. There exists a cool pre-built format for that. People use this formula because it works. No need to reinvent the wheel.

It goes like this:

* A clear, concise, and defined thesis statement that occurs in the first paragraph of the essay.

* Clear and logical transitions between the introduction, body, and conclusion.

* Body paragraphs that include evidential support. Evidential support (whether factual, logical, statistical, or anecdotal).

* A conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis, but readdresses it in light of the evidence provided.

I know that sounds stale and scholastic, but it really does work. Study that here: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/02/

I'm don't wish to seem overly critical. You are parsing out something I have always wanted to. It's heavy stuff to process.

(06-24-2012 05:34 PM)CharliePrime Wrote: [ -> ]Anarchist, this is a ton of information. You've spent a lot of time assembling it. Your thesis that YHWH is the adversary is intriguing.

Here's my critique of your essay:

It's too long. I got lost in all the quotes. The style of nineteenth century authors is often flowery, archaic, and difficult to wade through. I think you have too many quotes. I got lost trying to digest them. Less is sometimes more.

Early on you say "What is evident is that the top degrees of Masonry worship Lucifer, whom is Satan". I'm not sure that is true. My understanding is that Satan (the adversary) and Lucifer (the light bringer) are actually two different things. I need to investigate that more.

What you are doing is called an Expository Essay. There exists a cool pre-built format for that. People use this formula because it works. No need to reinvent the wheel.

It goes like this:

* A clear, concise, and defined thesis statement that occurs in the first paragraph of the essay.

* Clear and logical transitions between the introduction, body, and conclusion.

* Body paragraphs that include evidential support. Evidential support (whether factual, logical, statistical, or anecdotal).

* A conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis, but readdresses it in light of the evidence provided.

I know that sounds stale and scholastic, but it really does work. Study that here: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/02/

I'm don't wish to seem overly critical. You are parsing out something I have always wanted to. It's heavy stuff to process.

Thank you for your well-written critique. I will be the first to say it is not perfect, and probably could use some refining and more transitions,. You really think there are too many quotes? The purpose I intended was for the first part to include quotes from top Masons, to establish that they do indeed worship Lucifer, hence the name "Masonry is Luciferian". The other quotes are mostly from Scripture and from Strong's, with a few others. Which ones did you think were unnecessary? As far as it being long, I know. Believe it or not I tried to condense it as much as I possibly could while keeping the most important and relevant information. I was considering perhaps a series, which would allow me to go into detail on each of my titles, such as the Masoretes, the different types of Jews (I did not even mention where the real Hebrews went, that is a post in itself I may have to compose), how the "elite" do practically everything Satan, who is Lucifer, demands in return for power. Whether or not he is real, it does not matter, as they KNOW, not believe, that he is real.

Again, thank you for your reply, if you could give me a short summary of what you think is wrong with it, perhaps I can refine it. Oh, and if you are interested, with the preface added, in Microsoft Word, it is barely over 13 pages long, without the pictures. Very long indeed.

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]Masonry is Luciferian:

"That which we must say to a crowd is - We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition. To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees - The Masonic Religion should be, by all of us initates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian Doctrine. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay whose deeds prove his cruelty, perdify and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests, calumniate him? Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil."

-Albert Pike, 33° Grand Mason, Page 558, Instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the World, July 14, 1889. Recorded by A.C. De La Rive in La Femme et l'Enfant dans la FrancMaconnerie Universelle.

Like I said, the above passage is a fabrication, invented by De La Rive as part of his reporting on the Leo Taxil / Gabriel Jogand-Pagès Hoax:
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=3980
Also, Pike's falsely attributed "WWIII" quote is similarly a fabrication:
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Article...d-Wars.htm

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]Albert Pike was a 33° Mason, founder of the KKK, and one of the most prominent Freemasons to exist. In his book Morals and Dogma, he states:

"Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the son of the morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!"

-Morals and Dogma page 321.

There is NO EVIDENCE that Pike founded the KKK. None at all.
http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/kkk.html
A Pike connection was first attributed posthumously, in 1905, by Klan sympathizer and biographer Walter L. Fleming.

The Morals & Dogma quote is cherry-picked and out-of-context. Here it is in full:

"The Apocalypse, that sublime Kabalistic and prophetic Summary of all the occult figures, divides its images into three Septenaries, after each of which there is silence in Heaven. There are Seven Seals to be opened, that is to say, Seven mysteries to know, and Seven difficulties to overcome, Seven trumpets to sound, and Seven cups to empty.

The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer. LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not! for traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired.

The Apocalypse, indeed, is a book as obscure as the Sohar.

It is written hieroglyphically with numbers and images; and the Apostle often appeals to the intelligence of the Initiated. "Let him who hath knowledge, understand! let him who understands, calculate!" he often says, after an allegory or the mention of a number. Saint John, the favorite Apostle, and the Depositary of all the Secrets of the Saviour, therefore did not write to be understood by the multitude.

The Sephar Yezirah, the Sohar, and the Apocalypse are the completest embodiments of Occultism. They contain more meanings than words; their expressions are figurative as poetry and exact as numbers. The Apocalypse sums up, completes, and surpasses all the Science of Abraham and of Solomon. The visions of Ezekiel, by the river Chebar, and of the new Symbolic Temple, are equally mysterious expressions, veiled by figures of the enigmatic dogmas of the Kabalah, and their symbols are as little understood by the Commentators, as those of Free Masonry."

Morals & Dogma, p.320-321

Somewhat different in context, huh? Did you not see the line "which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer"? This is why I think you simply copy & pasted parts without fact-checking or reading these quotes in context.

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]Manly Palmer Hall, 33° Mason, wrote a well known book titled “The Secret Teachings of All Ages”, in which Hall claims:

"I hereby promise the Great Spirit Lucifuge, Prince of Demons, that each year I will bring unto him a human soul to do with as it may please him, and in return Lucifuge promises to bestow upon me the treasures of the earth and fulfill my every desire for the length of my natural life. If I fail to bring him each year the offering specified above, then my own soul shall be forfeit to him. Signed..... { Invocant signs pact with his own blood }”

-The Secret Teaching Of All Ages, page CIV.

This is disingenuous cherry-picking again. Hall is reprinting a "genuine" medieval pact in his section on Ceremonial Magic and Sorcery:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta24.htm
He does not prescribe, recommend or condone the pact, as your cherry-picked quote implies. He is merely reprinting the pact for historical and scholarly purposes, in context.

Also, Secret Teachings of All Ages was written in 1928 when Hall was only 27 years old, and 47 years before he joined freemasonry in 1973!

The book is FULL of inaccuracies and flights of fancy.

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]However, that was not his only book, as he published over 150 other works, including “The Lost Keys of Freemasonry”. In it, he states:

"When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy."

-The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Page 48.

The Lost Keys of Freemasonry was written in 1923 when Hall was just 22 years old, 50 years before becoming a freemason.

Again, this quote is taken out of context. The full quote is:

"The day has come when Fellow Craftsmen must know and apply their knowledge. The lost key to their grade is the mastery of emotion, which places the energy of the universe at their disposal. Man can only expect to be entrusted with great power by proving his ability to use it constructively and selflessly. When the Mason learns that the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply energy. He must follow in the footsteps of his forefather, Tubal-Cain, who with the mighty strength of the war god hammered his sword into a plowshare.

Incessant vigilance over thought, action, and desire is indispensable to those who wish to make progress in the unfolding of their own being, and the Fellow Craft's degree is the degree of transmutation. The hand that slays must lift the fallen, while the lips given to cursing must be taught to pray. The heart that hates must learn the mystery of compassion, as the result of a deeper and more perfect understanding of man's relation to his brother. The firm, kind hand of spirit must curb the flaming powers of emotion with an iron grip. In the realization and application of these principles lies the key of the Fellow Craft.

In this degree, the two points of the compass (one higher than the other), symbolize the heart and mind, and with the expression of the higher emotions the heart point of the compass is liberated from the square, which is an instrument used to measure the block of matter and therefore symbolizes form.

A large percentage of the people of the world at the present time are passing through, spiritually, the degree of the Fellow Craft, with its five senses. The sense perceptions come under the control of the emotional energies, therefore the development of the senses is necessary to the constructive expression of the Fellow Craft power. Man must realize that all the powers which his many years of need have earned for him have come in order that through them he may liberate more fully the prisoner within his own being. As the Fellow Craft degree is the middle of the three, the spiritual duty of each member is to reach the point of poise or balance, which is always secured between extremes. The mastery of expression is also to be found in this degree. The keywords of the Fellow Craft may be briefly defined as compassion, poise, and transmutation."

And it's meaning is explained well, here, by zetetic0void:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=90318

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]A pattern seems to be occurring, in which high level Freemasons glorify “Lucifer, the Light-Bearer”. Bringing us to Arthur Edward Waite, 33° Mason as well, who requests:

"First Conjuration Addressed to Emperor Lucifer. Emperor Lucifer, Master and Prince of Rebellious Spirits, I adjure thee to leave thine abode, in what-ever quarter of the world it may be situated and come hither to communicate with me. I command and I conjure thee in the Name of the Mighty Living God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, to appear without noise and without ...."

-The Book of Black Magic and of Pacts, page 244.

Again, this is cherry-picked out-of-context from a book on medieval grimoires. This passage is reprinted by Waite from the "Grand Grimoire". He does not prescribe, recommend or condone the pact, as the cherry-picked quote implies. He is reprinting the pact for historical and scholarly purposes, when viewed in context:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/grim/bcm/bcm63.htm

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]Eliphas Levi, whom Alester Crowley said he was the reincarnation thereof, was a high level Mason. Eliphas actually drew the Sabbatic Goat that came later to be associated with the word “Baphomet”. Some of his books were translated by Waite, mentioned above. An excerpt of The Mysteries of Magic is as follows:

"What is more absurd and more impious than to attribute the name of Lucifer to the devil, that is, to personified evil. The intellectual Lucifer is the spirit of intelligence and love; it is the paraclete, it is the Holy Spirit, while the physical Lucifer is the great agent of universal magnetism."

-The Mysteries of Magic, page 428.

Crowley often made wild claims about himself to bolster his image and provenance. He often admitted that his "past lives" weren't real, per se, rather each of those he claimed to have once been were large influences upon him.

Eliphas Lévi invented the "Baphomet" image in 1854, published in his book Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie. Let's see what Levi had to say about the image:

"The goat on the frontispiece carries the sign of the pentagram on the forehead, with one point at the top, a symbol of light, his two hands forming the sign of occultism, the one pointing up to the white moon of Chesed, the other pointing down to the black one of Geburah. This sign expresses the perfect harmony of mercy with justice. His one arm is female, the other male like the ones of the androgyne of Khunrath, the attributes of which we had to unite with those of our goat because he is one and the same symbol. The flame of intelligence shining between his horns is the magic light of the universal balance, the image of the soul elevated above matter, as the flame, whilst being tied to matter, shines above it. The beast's head expresses the horror of the sinner, whose materially acting, solely responsible part has to bear the punishment exclusively; because the soul is insensitive according to its nature and can only suffer when it materializes. The rod standing instead of genitals symbolizes eternal life, the body covered with scales the water, the semi-circle above it the atmosphere, the feathers following above the volatile. Humanity is represented by the two breasts and the androgyne arms of this sphinx of the occult sciences."

Not "Satan", "Lucifer" or whatever.

As for the quote from "Mysteries of Magic", there isn't even a page 428 in Waite's translation. It goes up to page 341 + notes, ads & index.
I don't know where this quote is from, but it is not from the book you copy & pasted, sorry, mentioned! (proof)
Nor in any of his other books.

Besides, there are many different meanings to "Lucifer", not necessarily your false misattribution of the character being one and the same as "Satan".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer
The bible's only mention, Isaiah 14:12, is a mistranslation, by the way. But the mistaken word is identical to the Greek word phosphorus, which is used in Revelation to describe "Jesus". What about that?

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]The quotes referenced above are few, but by no means limited. There is an abundant wealth of information similar to what is above, and what I have taken out is, as it is said, “a drop in the ocean”. What is evident is that the top degrees of Masonry worship Lucifer, whom is Satan. This point is very important to emphasise. To signify that the people at the top of the Masonic pyramid, collectively known as the Illuminati, worship Satan, is to insinuate that the powers that be who rule this world do so under the hand of Satan himself. Whether real or not, the “Illuminated Ones” believe such a being is real, and worship him religiously. Religiously does not even begin to portray their dedication. They obsessively cling to all that is Satan, and exalt him as the Grand Architect of the Universe, subjecting everyone underneath their rule to every whim of their, and by an extension of them, Satan’s desires. Everything they do, from their ceremonies, to the dates they hold events (an example is Hitler committing “suicide” on May 1, the same day the Illuminati were officially founded by Adam Weishaupt), to even what they wear. They fanatically embrace the doctrine of Lucifer, and subject everyone they can to its powers. We see it everywhere. They KNOW Satan is real, and desire to force him on all of us. They do so through media, through politics, contemporary education, general propaganda, religion, and non-religious holidays. An example would be Mother’s Day, which is celebration of Semiramis, whom birthed Tammuz, reincarnation of Nimrod, the original sun god, which is Satan.
It is not just the high level Masons that get tricked, just look at this video:

I don't think you've proven masonry has anything to do with "Satan" or "Lucifer".

The Illuminati was not, nor ever was, "Luciferian" or "Satanic". They were champions of the Enlightenment. They were Rationalists, Free-Thinkers, Atheists, etc. They wished to abolish tyranical dynastic monarchies across Europe, and to diminish the power of the Jesuits and the Roman Catholic Church. They were never opposed to christianity itself, par se, except as rational thinkers. This is much later propaganda attributed to them.

Historical innaccuracy: Hitler died April 30th, NOT May 1st.

Your Mother's Day banter is clutching at straws.

And, in the video, don't you think that guy could just be fucking with the interviewers? Ha ha.

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]It is also not just Masons that get tricked, and that is the purpose for this compilation of data. It is you. They spew lies in all directions, in hopes that some will eventually consume some of them. This is one of their biggest lies, and many people directly praise Satan himself without knowing. It is the lies of the Tetragrammaton.

Freemasonry has no secrets. All the rituals and teachings are in the public sphere (have been for 200 years or more) and there is nothing particularly sinister about them.

(06-23-2012 07:55 PM)Anarchist Wrote: [ -> ]Jahbulon:

Jahbulon is Jahovah, and is revealed to be the name Satan chose for himself. This name breaks down into three parts:

Jah – Jahovah.

Bul - Ba’al, particularly the god of Canaanites, Ba’al Zebub.

On – Osiris, god of the dead.

Interestingly, when one does a Google Image of Ba’al, the first image is the same as when you search for Jahbulon.

And, lastly, This is also wrong.

There are no credible instances of Bul meaning Ba'al. Bel, maybe. But then, why not shoehorn in a similar word?

On does not, and never has, meant Osiris. On is the Hebrew form of the Ancient Egyptian word for the city of Heliopolis.

Read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahbulon

Since this Jah-Bul-On bilge, popularized by Jordan Maxwell, has been repeated uncritically ad nauseum, you would expect Google searches to provide such results. The Ba'al pic is from Collin de Plancy's Dictionnaire Infernal, first published with illustrations in 1863.

Really, you're into a deadend cul-de-sac of christian propaganda trying to find "Satanism" or "Luciferianism" in freemasonry. There is no proof, and it is a wrong claim.



And, by the way, didn't you know that the Canaanites were one and the same as the Israelites? Check out the pioneering work of Israel Finkelstein, Bible Unearthed (which used to be on the tracker). Archaeology does not support the myth that there was a Hebrew slave race in Egypt. The Egyptians used skilled workers and artisans, not slaves. There was no Exodus. The latest research suggests the collapsed Canaanite empire developed into the Israelites, who then constructed a mythology around their new identity and inventing a fantastical origin story. Ba'al (originally a fertility god linked to agriculture) and other contemporaneous gods contributed to the formulation of Elohim (El, a Canaanite word) / Yahweh / Jehovah, and it was a slow transition. People clung to the old Canaanite gods. When orthodoxy reigned, there were condemnations and writings against these rival gods. There is nothing special about the god of the old testament, nor of the later new testament. It's just another man-made, invented god, unsupported by archaeology, based on false premises, and full of inconsistancies, contradictions and fabrications, all of it.

(06-24-2012 05:34 PM)CharliePrime Wrote: [ -> ]Early on you say "What is evident is that the top degrees of Masonry worship Lucifer, whom is Satan". I'm not sure that is true. My understanding is that Satan (the adversary) and Lucifer (the light bringer) are actually two different things. I need to investigate that more.

I'm pretty sure you're right on that. I would agree that Freemasonry is Luficferian, but not Satanic

Quote:It's too long.

Lots of things seem to be too long for you. Not a big fan of reading, huh?

Thanks Tim

Thanks for the post here Anarchist, respect

Anarchist you definitely have your info a little mixed.....Lucifer and Satan are not the same thing...entirely different....Lucifer, satan and the devil are thre different constructs of Christianity to rule through control...lucifer saved mankind from ignorance thats the only metaphor in the bible that matters....It is true man has godhood but for what reason god wanted to keep it from you based on the scripture.....as far as im concerned Lucifer, satan, and all other personifications of evil by Christianity is reverse what all traditional christians believe...i really dont feel like typing all of this....i need to find a text to speech app....in all truth...lucifer isnt what you make him out to be......but masons worship a corrupt version of ancient kemetic knowledge that has been distorted to keep all true living descedants of the annunaki...from ever wanting to learn knowledge that is theirs....egypt(kemet) is the pinnacle of all peoples religious beliefs for all their religions are offshoots of kemetic spirituality...baphomet, lucifer and many other terms are not at all what most thing they are.....