ConCen

This week (ending Friday Sept 23rd, 2011) is the UN general asembly of the world's biggest hypocrites.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, again, says : fuck the official version of 9/11.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15028776

I uploaded full speech, interview and 2 other news clips with it...

Ahmadinejad at UN 2011 full speech with interview and news clips
http://concen.org/tracker/torrents-details.php?id=25595

1 - Full speech by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at UN General Assembly 2011 [31:17]
2 - PressTV - Ahmadinejads UN speech-News Analysis [20110922] [24:35]
3 - CNN - Ahmadinejads Speech at The UN General Assembly Convenes in NY [20110922] [20:53]
4 - MSNBC - Interview with President Dr. Ahmadinejad [20110913] [50:12]


PDF - Ahmadinejad at UN 2011 full speech (Iran statement)
http://concen.org/tracker/torrents-details.php?id=25599

Why the embedding of a youtube video using the youtube script (which you can maximize), at first works perfectly then it does not work anymore ?. It happened to 3 of my videos already !!.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBSF2Snj5uM

you mean...



?

iFrames have never been supported here man

(09-24-2011 07:29 PM)Dunamis Wrote: [ -> ]you mean...

video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBSF2Snj5uM[/video]?

iFrames have never been supported here man

When I just posted it, it was working perfectly. Same with my other embedded videos, they always work at first.

Here is an example where the youtube script works :

http://concen.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=42572

Whenever my thread is moved by a moderator, the script stops working

Ah, well there's the problem, we don't support iFrames, and s the system clearly for some reason likes it for a moment, but not if moved (or maybe edited too).

It's easy enough though to stick with the code we do support.

I thought about using a SoundCloud iFrame a while back, but that won't even post like your other vid.

Why is this thread under "Terrorism" anyway? It's about Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addressing UN General Assembly after all, and he didn't kill anyone.

It should be obvious it was because the thread was started as this: "Iran president makes 9/11 claims at the UN (again)"

But after watching last night, and half of the interview so far, I can safely say, this has no reason to be in this category. Moved to Velvet Glove.

Or programming of the people is obvious perhaps? When Iran's president criticizes Israel or Zionists he is a terrorist, public thinks. Wonderful.

(09-25-2011 12:19 PM)Armilus Wrote: [ -> ]Or programming of the people is obvious perhaps? When Iran's president criticizes Israel or Zionists he is a terrorist, public thinks. Wonderful.

You'd have to ask rockingtheboat if the reason he posted it with that title and in that forum originally is because he is programmed to think Ahmadinejad is a terrorist. (It may even be another mod hastily moved it you know), it's not such a big deal imo.

Quote:It's about Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addressing UN General Assembly after all, and he didn't kill anyone

Except his own country's citizens by stoning to death if they engage in the horrific crime of adultery or homosexuality. It's a good country for rapists, Islamic Iran, since a woman there needs two male witnesses to bring a rape charge against a man and virgins are raped to 'be married' by Islamic law before execution.

Why don't you go read the criminal code of the Islamic republic before you automatically assume that this controlled opposition clown is some kind of 'hero' just because he gives anti-Zionist speeches and representatives of other countries walk out of them? All they have to do is put on a silly farce and everybody believes it.

You shall know them by their fruits, not by their words.

What are the fruits vs the rhetoric of Islamic Iran?

They claim they are Anti-usury? No Interest charged? No Interest given to a private central bank? The reality: their own central bank, corruption and fiat money inflation. Double digit inflation for past 30 years including some years as high as 25%? Mass unemployment and opium addiction (Despite narcotics being illegal and harsh sentences, Iran is the number one drug-addicted country on the planet in terms of percentage of addicts to population and who do you suppose makes the profit? ). Whose pocket does inflation put money in ? The poor? If you think that I've got some fat Mullahs that want to sell you desert beach property.

Call Hitler a prescripton pill addict all you want but let's see the fruits vs. the rhetoric of Hitler: Did Hitler's Germany have millions of opium addicts, mass unemployment and 25% inflation? ha ha, dream on. They had the inventions of the Jet engine, the first fully programmable computer, the first binary calculator, the helicopter, nuclear fission, the first guided missiles, night vision technology, etc. They had full employment, Volkswagens, the Autobahn and progress like no other period in German history, no other period in world history except for a couple of periods in 19th century U.S.

The Zionist-occupied U.S. government does not help Iran because Iran is the enemy of Israel, right? Wrong again. War is profit for and the health of the state and thefore the rulers of the state so they always push for war. But who the hell would go to war against a bunch of camel-riding desert dwellers?

They massively help and support their controlled opposition stooges just like the Soviet Union before. The rhetoric is the opposite of the reality:

US Has Given Over $100 BILLION To Companies Defying Its Policy On Iran

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/06...88787.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/world/...ss&emc=rss

And the US are somehow better than Iran with the things they put people to death for? Let alone the 1+ million dead in Iraq.

If the West were to attack Iran, it sadly would be nothing to do with the clear humanitarian needs there that go unaddressed, and MORE would suffer, and to a much greater extent.

Where were the US when Iraq attacked Iran...oh yea, I forgot, selling weapons to Saddam with "my nation" the UK.

(09-25-2011 05:38 PM)Negentropic Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:It's about Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addressing UN General Assembly after all, and he didn't kill anyone

Except his own country's citizens by stoning to death if they engage in the horrific crime of adultery or homosexuality. It's a good country for rapists, Islamic Iran, since a woman there needs two male witnesses to bring a rape charge against a man and virgins are raped to 'be married' by Islamic law before execution.

Why don't you go read the criminal code of the Islamic republic before you automatically assume that this controlled opposition clown is some kind of 'hero' just because he gives anti-Zionist speeches and representatives of other countries walk out of them? All they have to do is put on a silly farce and everybody believes it.

You shall know them by their fruits, not by their words.

What are the fruits vs the rhetoric of Islamic Iran?

They claim they are Anti-usury? No Interest charged? No Interest given to a private central bank?
[...]
Call Hitler a prescripton pill addict all you want but let's see the fruits vs. the rhetoric of Hitler: Did Hitler's Germany have millions of opium addicts, mass unemployment and 25% inflation? ha ha, dream on.
[...]

Of course they have problems to fix, just like any other country. However, all countries have the right to participate at the UN, and others should listen to them, not walk away. If the truth is on their side, they have nothing to fear. Same applies to the general public -- they should listen to both sides, not just one-sided propaganda, crafted carefully to prepare people for the next war.

I didn't call Hitler anything. He was abusing amphetamines and possibly few other experimental wonders from Dr. Morell. Some of which was actually effective.

Quote:And the US are somehow better than Iran with the things they put people to death for? Let alone the 1+ million dead in Iraq.

If the West were to attack Iran, it sadly would be nothing to do with the clear humanitarian needs there that go unaddressed, and MORE would suffer, and to a much greater extent.

Where were the US when Iraq attacked Iran...oh yea, I forgot, selling weapons to Saddam with "my nation" the UK.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no necessary direct correlation between the internal freedoms of a country and its external aggressiveness or vice versa. External human rights abuse like NATO's, the U.S. and British Army's or CIA's is not justified in the least but neither is internal human rights abuse and relative external isolationism like Maoist China, Ahmedinejad's Iran or Fidel Castro's Cuba. Being victims of imperialism does not justify terrorizing and killing your own population and being internally relatively free like the U.S. was until the Patriot acts, does not justify attacking and killing people in less internally free and sometimes even brutally unfree countries like Khomeini's / Ahmedinejad's Iran or Taliban Afghanistan or The Soviet Union.


The U.S. and any Western or Eastern Christian European country is, even in this day and age of economic decline due to complete Zionist stranglehold, absolutely 100% a better place to live than Ahmedinejad's opium-addicted, double-digit-inflation, women-worth-only-half-a-man, hypocritical Islamic Iran. There were no outright medieval laws in the USA or Western Europe in the past century prior to the 'Patriot Act.'

Maybe you're not familiar with the wonderful world of the Islamic penal code of Iran? I won't post the Ayatollah Khomeini's own sayings from his own many written books because they will make you puke. Here's just a little sampling of the penal code:

Quote:http://mehr.org/Islamic_Penal_Code_of_Iran.pdf

Article 82. The penalty for adultery in the following cases shall be death, regardless of the age or marital status of the culprit: (1) Adultery with one's consanguineous relatives (close blood relatives forbidden to each other by religious law); (2) Adultery with one's stepmother in which the adulterer's punishment shall be death; (3) Adultery between a non-Muslim man and a Muslim woman, in which case the adulterer (non-Muslim man) shall receive the death penalty; (4) Forcible rape, in which case the rapist shall receive the death penalty.

Article 83. Adultery in the following cases shall be punishable by stoning: (1) Adultery by a married man who is wedded to a permanent wife with whom he has had intercourse and may have intercourse when he so desires; (2) Adultery of a married woman with an adult man provided the woman is permanently married and has had intercourse with her husband and is able to do so again.

Note. Adultery of a married woman with a minor is punishable by flogging.

Article 84. Old married adulterers and adulteresses shall be flogged before being stoned.

Article 85. Revocable divorce shall not relieve the husband or wife from the bond of marriage during the waiting period whereas irrevocable divorce shall do so.

Article 86. Adultery of a permanently married man or a permanently married woman who does not have access to his or her spouse, due to travel, incarceration or similar impediments, shall not require stoning.

Article 88. The punishment for an unmarried adulterer or adulteress shall be one hundred lashes.

Article 90. If a man or a woman has committed the act of adultery several times and has been punished after each act, he or she shall be put to death following his or her fourth act of adultery.

Article 91. An adulteress shall not be punished while pregnant or in menstruation or when, following birth and in the absence of a guardian, the newborn's life is in danger. If, however, the newborn becomes the ward of a guardian the punishment shall be carried out.

Article 92. If the flogging of a pregnant woman or a woman nursing her child poses risks to the unborn or to the child respectively, the execution of the punishment shall be delayed until the said risk is no longer present.

Article 93. If an ailing woman or a woman in menstruation has been condemned to death or stoning, the punishment shall be carried out. If, however, she is condemned to flogging, the punishment shall be delayed until she is recovered or her menstruation period is over.

Article 100. The flogging of an adulterer shall be carried out while he is standing upright and his body bare except for his genitals. The lashes shall strike all parts of his body–- except his face, head and genitals-- with full force. The adulteress shall be flogged while she is seated and her clothing tightly bound to her body.

Article 102. The stoning of an adulterer or adulteress shall be carried out while each is placed in a hole and covered with soil, he up to his waist and she up to a line above her breasts.

Article 119. Testimony of women alone or in conjunction with that of a single man shall not prove sodomy.

Article 127. Lesbianism consists in genital sexual acts carried out between women.

Article 128. Evidence for proof of lesbianism and sodomy is the same.

Article 129. The punishment for lesbianism is a hundred lashes for both parties to the act.

Article 130. Punishment for lesbianism applies only to the person who is of age, sane, in control of her actions and who has been a willing party to the act of lesbianism.

Note. In the application of the penalty for lesbianism there shall be no distinction as to whether the culprit has been passive or active or as to whether she is a Muslim or non-Muslim.

Article 131. If the act of lesbianism has been repeated three times and punishment has been carried out each time, the death penalty shall apply if the act is committed a fourth time.

Article 132. If the perpetrator of the act of lesbianism repents prior to the testimony of witnesses, the penalty of hadd shall not apply. Repentance following the witnesses' testimony, however, shall not bar hadd punishment.

Article 133. If the act of lesbianism is proved through confession and the culprit repents afterwards, the judge may ask the supreme jurist (vali-ye amr) for waiver of punishment.

Article 134. If two women, who are not consanguineous, go under the same bed cover while nude and without justification, they shall be given fewer than one hundred lashes. In case of repetition of the act for a third time each shall be given one hundred lashes.

Article 138. The penalty for procurement is in the case of a male procurer 75 lashes and banishment between three months and a year and in the case of a female procurer only 75 lashes.

Article 140. The penalty for false accusation is 80 lashes regardless of the gender of the culprit.

Article 145. Any insult that causes indignation to the victim but which does not constitute false accusation of adultery or male homosexuality, such as when a husband tells his wife: 'You were not a virgin,' is punishable by up to 74 lashes.

Still willing to move to 'heroic' Iran to fight on their side and enjoy the great anti-Zionist Islamic utopia of Ahmedinejad's Khomeini regime just because he babbles a few truisms any retard with internet access should be aware of by now about 9/11 and the holohoax ? Be my guest.

Iran (means land of the Arya or Aryan in farsi) under Reza Shah took the side of Hitler in WWII, the reverse will never happen. Western soldiers are brainwashed with propaganda thinking they're out massacaring foreigners in wars to protect 'freedom' or even that country's own 'freedom' precisely because they see the opposite in the absurd bogie-man controlled-opposition farce of the Khomeni-Ahmedinejad-crazy-Mullahs face of Islamic Iran, fostered deliberately since 1979 in the Jew-owned media all over the world. The Islamics know who their enemy is after watching the spectacle of how Israel has treated the Palestinians for 60 years, whereas the hordes of idiots in the West still haven't figured it out.

Iran pretends to be independent of the USA and Israel while taking 100 billion from U.S. companies on the sly to keep itself propped up, and what is the U.S. if not Israel and vice-versa, they're both one & the same now and have been for a while, controlled by the same banking cabal's money power. Therefore Ahmedinejad is a controlled opposition stooge, whether he himself knows it or not, same as Stalin and Khrushchev and Castro and the rest of them. Unfortunately there are no world leaders today who can be considered 'heroes,' not even Chavez.

So, basically you are saying there are human right violations in Iran, and how it is far from perfect place to live in. Well, tell me something i don't know.

Biggest issue here is not Iran, but the fact cowards from the US and EU walked away when someone dared to speak against them selling out for Israel. Is this how diplomats should behave, by walking away? As i said, if the truth is on their side, they have nothing to fear.