ConCen

Is race mixing a way to present the conformist collectivist model or is it encouraging more diversity and division is having ostracized half-breeds? I suppose that all depends on cultural acceptance of different races.

I have also wondered if this is a breeding program to promote selective traits in people.

Here's the breakdown .. 2006 various census estimates and info from different sources and different years.

Asian 54%
- East Asian 24% (ie. Korea, Mongolia ,China, Japan)
- South Asian 21% (ie. India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal)
- Southeast Asian 9% (ie. Cambodia, Bruma, Philippines, Malayasia)
Black 15%
White 15%
Hispanic 8%
Middle Eastern 8%

I'd like to see the growth but there was a one child policy in China imposed in 1979 but it made for more a cultural shift in having more boys which then participated in more prostitution and fuelled baby selling to sex markets and all that jazz. It also created a surplus of men in the workforce for heavy labour. It may contribute to the destruction of traditionally strong Chinese family values and an increase in abortion. It's quite a study in having a mostly male population.

A surplus of 30 million men may be exported to spread their seed worldwide at a later time.

There are like 100s of "races" though, here's a breakdown by country.

CIA Factbook Ethnicity:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications.../2075.html

Media is pushing black on white relationships it seems (especially white women + black men), just a curiosity. The racial mix is way up probably due to increased world travel is the most likely answer.

Might be nothing but the world is set for an Ethnically Asian based population explosion.

Other factors to consider:

* The engineered race diseases vaccination / GMO programs aimed primarily at blacks and Africans.

* The fact the so called "elite" preserve their bloodlines.

* The feminization of boys with BPA and other chemicals such as increased estrogen in the water from birth control.

* The HPV vaccine that is sterilizing women.

* The birth control pill for men.

* Increased radiation levels, lower sperm counts.

* The media push for gay acceptance and even gay promotion

* "Normal" levels of male birth are anywhere from 104:100 to 111:100 the national ave

* There is a lot of genetic tracking going on; in Africa in particular

Gender ratios across the world:

World Average (2009)
at birth: 1.07 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.07 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 1.02 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.79 male(s)/female
total population: 1.01 male(s)/female (2009 est.)

India
at birth: 1.12 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.13 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 1.07 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.91 male(s)/female
total population: 1.08 male(s)/female (2010 est.)

China
at birth: 1.14 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.17 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 1.06 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.93 male(s)/female
total population: 1.06 male(s)/female (2010 est.)

Africa
No consolidated figures available but there seems to be a trend in a low male to female ratio at about 1:00 to 1:02 for children under 15 years which is the real figure to focus on because of unreported births and trends.

Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications...horRow=#us

Not sure what to make of this trend towards more black women, more mixing, more Asian men and fewer whites. Social Engineering, breeding out racial traits (strengths weaknesses) -- and realistically the data I am using is from the UN and CIA.

A little help on this? Insights? Data?

UPDATED

Quote:Media is pushing black on white relationships it seems (especially white women + black men), just a curiosity. The racial mix is way up probably due to increased world travel is the most likely answer.

At one point this was quite different though, and the media were very much against such relationships being shown. That may be one area where the public very much has a control of what the media shows (such is the world of "entertainment").

Here's one example of how the media has had to change, from where they once stood:

Quote:The Motion Picture Production Code of 1930, also known as Hays Code, explicitly stated that the depiction of "miscegenation... is forbidden." One important strategy intended to discourage the marriage of white Americans and Americans of partly African descent was the promulgation of the one-drop theory, which held that any person with any known African ancestry, however remote, must be regarded as "black". This definition of blackness was encoded in the anti-miscegenation laws of various U.S. states, such as Virginia's Racial Integrity Act of 1924. The plaintiffs in Loving v. Virginia, Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving became the historically most prominent interracial couple in the US through their legal struggle against this act.

But also, the lawmakers were against such relationships, until the public demanded change (Case in point, the U.S.).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-miscegenation_laws

Quote:As late as 2009, a Louisiana justice of the peace refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple, justifying the decision on grounds of concern for any children the couple might have.

I myself don't really think TPTB really care about who we do or don't mix with, as long as we (the proles, the ants or 'worker bees', no matter your ethnicity) do not "pollute" their bloodlines. Why do you think the elite see past such stuff? There are such elite bloodlines in Asian, the Middle East, the America's, and MANY in Europe, and they keep breeding rules (of those that will continue the "great work" at least) extremely strict. They don't seem to marry 'too far' from their genetic/family lines though themselves, but maybe not due to 'race', as much as creed IMO. Marrying out of such rules usually sees these people ostracised, in rarer cases, dead.