ConCen

first up we have the freefall arguement

a great vid

you are going to be going round in circles whilst you try and evaluate what happened from these videos.

---

irrespective of whether they are still up or not..that is not my point.

The "I'm an AV guy!!" is tired -- it is analogous to Jazzroc's "I am the scientist!" canard. Forgetthepartyline and start looking into it with open eyes.

The videos are not there, what were they of? WT1 or WT2 or WT7 and, while I am asking questions, why weren't WT3, WT4, WT5 and WT6 totally pulverized by the WT1 and Wt2? The official theory says that WT7 was mortally wounded by WT1 fragments that hit it? Why do photos taken, in Sept. 2001, of these buildings look like cavities that have been drilled out?
Sorry, I'll find another source for the WT3,4,5,6 photos and post it when I do.




"In the video, it is clear that the top 30 or so floors have snapped off and are toppling eastward. In the above frames, we follow the north-east corner of the tower as this 30 floor section descends. Using the north-east corner as a reference, I have outlined in red, the progress of this 30 floor section as it descends.

The first thing to note, is that the top section itself must be disintegrating, otherwise (as the above frames show) the top section would have extended far into parts of the building that are clearly, as yet, unaffected by the collapse.

But what could possibly cause the top section to disintegrate? And in fact, what could possibly cause the top section to almost entirely disintegrate, before the lower section begins to collapse?

You have to realize that most of the top section had not been affected by the aircraft strike or fires and was thus still the same immensely strong structure that had supported the building for some 30 years. If this section was going to fall at all, this section would fall as one piece (like a tree in the forest). Unless, of course, this section had been laced with explosives and was undergoing a controlled demolition of its own, just a few moments before the lower part of the building was demolished. "
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guar...osions.htm

(08-21-2010 04:29 PM)icosaface Wrote: [ -> ]But what could possibly cause the top section to disintegrate? And in fact, what could possibly cause the top section to almost entirely disintegrate, before the lower section begins to collapse?

CGI replacement videos to disguise a very ordinary looking controlled demolition ? It's just a question..

Distractions, obfuscations and prevarications you say?

I think it is definitely of worth to look into and consider the analysis suggesting such and not to write it off as too fantastic as seemingly is the static response throughout the 911 truth movement,yes.