ConCen

Falwell Confirms Lewinsky Affair Linked To Israeli Lobby Intrigue

By Michael Collins Piper
1-6-6

Television evangelist Jerry Falwell couldn't resist bragging and finally admitting the truth: he and former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu did conspire-at a critical time-to trip up President Bill Clinton and specifically use the pressure of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal to force Clinton to abandon pressure on Israel to withdraw from the occupied West Bank.

Falwell's confession didn't make national news-as it should have. Instead, the preacher's confession came buried in a lengthy story in the December 2005 issue of Vanity Fair. Entitled "American Rapture" the article (by Craig Unger) described the long-standing and still-flourishing love affair between American dispensationalist evangelicals such as Falwell and the hardline Jewish extremist forces in Israel then under the leadership of Binyamin "Bibi" Netanyahu.

The admission by Falwell confirms precisely what this author first revealed in a story published in The Spotlight on February 9, 1998 and later recounted in a lecture before the Arab League's official think tank, the Zayed Centre in Abu Dhabi, in March of 2003.

Although, following the lecture at the Zayed Centre, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, a lobby for Israel, denounced as a "bizarre conspiracy theory" the assertion by Falwell that the public unveiling of the Lewinsky affair forced Clinton to pull back on pressuring Israel confirmed exactly what was reported in documented detail in The Spotlight in an international exclusive.

Regarding Falwell's recounting of how he worked with Netanyahu in undermining Clinton's pressure on Israel, Vanity Fair reported:

On a visit to Washington, D.C. in 1998, Netanyahu hooked up with Jerry Falwell at the Mayflower Hotel the night before [Netanyahu's] scheduled meeting with Clinton. "I put together 1,000 people or so to meet with Bibi [Netanyahu] and he spoke to us that night," recalls Falwell. "It was all planned by Netanyahu as an affront to Mr. Clinton." . . . The next day, Netanyahu met with Clinton at the White House. "Bibi told me later," Falwell recalls, "that the next morning Bill Clinton said, 'I know where you were last night." The pressure was really on Netanyahu to give away the farm in Israel. It was during the Monica Lewinsky scandal . . . . Clinton had to save himself, so he terminated the demands [to relinquish West Bank territory] that would have been forthcoming during that meeting, and would have been very bad for Israel." (END OF VANITY FAIR EXCERPT)

What Falwell did not mention-at least as reported by Vanity Fair-is that his meeting with the Israeli leader took place on the very evening before the mass media in America broke open the Monica Lewinsky scandal with much fanfare. Nor did Falwell mention-as this author pointed out at the time- was that one of Netanyahu's leading American media publicists, neo-conservative power broker, William Kristol, the first American media figure to publicly hint (in the days before the scandal was officially unveiled) that there were forthcoming revelations regarding a White House sex scandal that was about to be unleashed.

In addition, this author pointed out that at least six days before the first news of the Lewinsky scandal began breaking in the media at midnight on Tuesday, January 20, 1998, an advertisement appeared in the January 15 edition of the distinguished Washington Jewish Week newspaper accusing President Clinton of having "turned his back on Israel."

What made the advertisement so striking was that it used a rear view of President Clinton (first captured on video in 1996) that had never been published but which, in the wake of the Lewinsky scandal, became very familiar. It was a view of the president, his back to the camera, clearly taken from the video in which he was seen hugging the soon-to-be infamous Miss Lewinsky when she was in a receiving line at the White House some two years before. This was an image that Miss Lewinsky had bragged about among her associates prior to the time that the scandal broke. So clearly, Clinton's critics among the hard-line pro-Netanyahu forces in the United States-who sponsored the advertisement in question-were already tuned in to the fact of the Lewinsky-Clinton liaison and of the fact that it was soon to be unleashed against the president to undermine him.

This author can now reveal, for the first time, that two figures at the very highest level of the Clinton White House were personally given copies of The Spotlight's articles regarding these matters and that, at the time, they quietly acknowledged that the articles were "probably right."

The fact that Jerry Falwell's acknowledgment of how the Lewinsky affair was used as a club against Clinton-in tandem with "Bibi" Netanyahu's appearance at the White House, following the meeting with Falwell-was published in Vanity Fair is interesting in and of itself. That magazine is owned by the far-flung publishing empire of the billionaire Newhouse brothers ("Si" and Donald) whom Forbes dubbed the 25th richest family in America and who are known to be generous contributors to the Anti-Defamation League and other elements of the pro-Israel lobby. --




http://www.rense.com/general69/col.htm

That figures

Always use Sex to nail the politicians

Damn haven't listened to MCP in weeks, wonder what I missed?

That fits well with the following archived article and the israeli spies story exposed by Carl Cameron on December of 2001 :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4w7oYpDxUM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dUoydYdOBQ

(Sorry, I could have done a better formatting but just bear with me.)

Quote:This is G o o g l e's cache of .
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
advertisement
advertisement
your email

05/29/2000 : FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House
By J. Michael Waller and Paul M. Rodriguez
waller@insightmag.com and rodriguez@insightmag.com

A foreign spy service appears to have penetrated
secret communications in the Clinton
administration, which has discounted security and
intelligence threats.
The FBI is probing an explosive foreign-espionage operation
that could dwarf the other spy scandals plaguing the U.S.
government. Insight has learned that FBI counterintelligence is
tracking a daring operation to spy on high-level U.S. officials
by hacking into supposedly secure telephone networks. The
espionage was facilitated, federal officials say, by lax
telephone-security procedures at the White House, State
Department and other high-level government offices and by a
Justice Department unwillingness to seek an indictment against
a suspect.
The espionage operation may have serious ramifications
because the FBI has identified Israel as the culprit. It risks
undermining U.S. public support for the Jewish state at a time
Israel is seeking billions of tax dollars for the return of land to
Syria. It certainly will add to perceptions that the Clinton-Gore
administration is not serious about national security. Most
important, it could further erode international confidence in the
ability of the United States to keep secrets and effectively lead
as the world’s only superpower.
More than two dozen U.S. intelligence,
counterintelligence, law-enforcement and other officials have
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 1 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
told Insight that the FBI believes Israel has intercepted
telephone and modem communications on some of the most
sensitive lines of the U.S. government on an ongoing basis. The
worst penetrations are believed to be in the State Department.
But others say the supposedly secure telephone systems in the
White House, Defense Department and Justice Department
may have been compromised as well.
The problem for FBI agents in the famed Division 5,
however, isn’t just what they have uncovered, which is
substantial, but what they don’t yet know, according to
Insight’s sources interviewed during a year-long investigation
by the magazine. Of special concern is how to confirm and deal
with the potentially sweeping espionage penetration of key
U.S. government telecommunications systems allowing foreign
eavesdropping on calls to and from the White House, the
National Security Council, or NSC, the Pentagon and the State
Department.
The directors of the FBI and the CIA have been kept
informed of the ongoing counterintelligence operation, as have
the president and top officials at the departments of Defense,
State and Justice and the NSC. A “heads up” has been given to
the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, but no
government official would speak for the record.
“It’s a huge security nightmare,” says a senior U.S. official
familiar with the super-secret counterintelligence operation.
“The implications are severe,” confirms a second with direct
knowledge. “We’re not even sure we know the extent of it,”
says a third high-ranking intelligence official. “All I can tell
you is that we think we know how it was done,” this third
intelligence executive tells Insight. “That alone is serious
enough, but it’s the unknown that has such deep
consequences.”
A senior government official who would go no further than
to admit awareness of the FBI probe, says: “It is a politically
sensitive matter. I can’t comment on it beyond telling you that
anything involving Israel on this particular matter is off-limits.
It’s that hot.”
It is very hot indeed. For nearly a year, FBI agents had
been tracking an Israeli businessman working for a local phone
company. The man’s wife is alleged to be a Mossad officer
under diplomatic cover at the Israeli Embassy in Washington.
Mossad — the Israeli intelligence service — is known to
station husband-and-wife teams abroad, but it was not known
whether the husband is a full-fledged officer, an agent or
something else. When federal agents made a search of his work
area they found a list of the FBI’s most sensitive telephone
numbers, including the Bureau’s “black” lines used for
wiretapping. Some of the listed numbers were lines that FBI
counterintelligence used to keep track of the suspected Israeli
spy operation. The hunted were tracking the hunters.
“It was a shock,” says an intelligence professional familiar
with the FBI phone list. “It called into question the entire
operation. We had been compromised. But for how long?”
This discovery by Division 5 should have come as no
surprise, given what its agents had been tracking for many
months. But the FBI discovered enough information to make it
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 2 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
believe that, somehow, the highest levels of the State
Department were compromised, as well as the White House
and the NSC. According to Insight’s sources with direct
knowledge, other secure government telephone systems and/or
phones to which government officials called also appear to
have been compromised.
The tip-off about these operations — the pursuit of which
sometimes has led the FBI on some wild-goose chases —
appears to have come from the CIA, says an Insight source. A
local phone manager had become suspicious in late 1996 or
early 1997 about activities by a subcontractor working on
phone-billing software and hardware designs for the CIA.
The subcontractor was employed by an Israeli-based
company and cleared for such work. But suspicious behavior
raised red flags. After a fairly quick review, the CIA handed
the problem to the FBI for follow-up. This was not the first
time the FBI had been asked to investigate such matters and,
though it was politically explosive because it involved Israel,
Division 5 ran with the ball. “This is always a sensitive issue
for the Bureau,” says a former U.S. intelligence officer. “When
it has anything to do with Israel, it’s something you just never
want to poke your nose into. But this one had too much
potential to ignore because it involved a potential systemwide
penetration.”
Seasoned counterintelligence veterans are not surprised.
“The Israelis conduct intelligence as if they are at war. That’s
something we have to realize,” says David Major, a retired FBI
supervisory special agent and former director of
counterintelligence at the NSC. While the U.S. approach to
intelligence is much more relaxed, says Major, the very
existence of Israel is threatened and it regards itself as is in a
permanent state of war. “There are a lot less handcuffs on
intelligence for a nation that sees itself at war,” Major observes,
but “that doesn’t excuse it from our perspective.”
For years, U.S. intelligence chiefs have worried about
moles burrowed into their agencies, but detecting them was
fruitless. The activities of Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard were
uncovered by accident, but there remains puzzlement to this
day as to how he was able to ascertain which documents to
search, how he did so on so many occasions without detection,
or how he ever obtained the security clearances that opened the
doors to such secrets. In all, it is suspected, Pollard turned over
to his Israeli handlers about 500,000 documents, including
photographs, names and locations of overseas agents. “The
damage was incredible,” a current U.S. intelligence officer tells
Insight. “We’re still recovering from it.”
Also there has been concern for years that a mole was
operating in the NSC and, while not necessarily supplying
highly secret materials to foreign agents, has been turning over
precious details on meetings and policy briefings that are being
used to track or otherwise monitor government activities.
The current hush-hush probe by the FBI, and what its
agents believe to be a serious but amorphous security breach
involving telephone and modem lines that are being monitored
by Israeli agents, has even more serious ramifications. “It has
been an eye opener,” says one high-ranking U.S. government
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 3 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
official, shaking his head in horror as to the potential level and
scope of penetration.
As for how this may have been done technologically, the
FBI believes it has uncovered a means using telephonecompany
equipment at remote sites to track calls placed to or
received from high-ranking government officials, possibly
including the president himself, according to Insight’s top-level
sources. One of the methods suspected is use of a private
company that provides record-keeping software and support
services for major telephone utilities in the United States.
A local telephone company director of security Roger
Kochman tells Insight, “I don’t know anything about it, which
would be highly unusual. I am not familiar with anything in
that area.”
U.S. officials believe that an Israeli penetration of that
telephone utility in the Washington area was coordinated with a
penetration of agents using another telephone support-services
company to target select telephone lines. Suspected penetration
includes lines and systems at the White House and NSC, where
it is believed that about four specific phones were monitored —
either directly or through remote sites that may involve
numbers dialed from the complex.
“[The FBI] uncovered what appears to be a sophisticated
means to listen in on conversations from remote telephone sites
with capabilities of providing real-time audio feeds directly to
Tel Aviv,” says a U.S. official familiar with the FBI
investigation. Details of how this could have been pulled off
are highly guarded. However, a high-level U.S. intelligence
source tells Insight: “The access had to be done in such a way
as to evade our countermeasures … That’s what’s most
disconcerting.”
Another senior U.S. intelligence source adds: “How long
this has been going on is something we don’t know. How many
phones or telephone systems we don’t know either, but the best
guess is that it’s no more than 24 at a time … as far as we can
tell.”
And has President Clinton been briefed? “Yes, he has.
After all, he’s had meetings with his Israeli counterparts,” says
a senior U.S. official with direct knowledge. Whether the
president or his national-security aides, including NSC chief
Sandy Berger, have shared or communicated U.S. suspicions
and alarm is unclear, as is the matter of any Israeli response.
“This is the first I’ve heard of it,” White House National
Security Council spokesman Dave Stockwell tells Insight.
“That doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or that someone else
doesn’t know.”
Despite elaborate precautions by the U.S. agencies
involved, say Insight’s sources, this alleged Israeli intelligence
coup came down to the weakest link in the security chain: the
human element. The technical key appears to be software
designs for telephone billing records and support equipment
required for interfacing with local telephone company
hardware installed in some federal agencies. The FBI has
deduced that it was this sophisticated computer-related
equipment and software could provide real-time audio feeds. In
fact, according to Insight’s sources, the FBI believes that at
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 4 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
least one secure T-1 line routed to Tel Aviv has been used in
the suspected espionage.
The potential loss of U.S. secrets is incalculable. So is the
possibility that senior U.S. officials could be blackmailed for
indiscreet telephone talk. Many officials do not like to bother
with using secure, encrypted phones and have classified
discussions on open lines.
Which brings the story back to some obvious questions
involving the indiscreet telephone conversations of the
president himself. Were they tapped, and, if so did they involve
national-security issues or just matters of the flesh? Monica
Lewinsky told Kenneth Starr, as recounted in his report to
Congress, that Lewinsky and Clinton devised cover stories
should their trysts be uncovered and/or their phone-sex capers
be overheard.
Specifically, she said that on March 29, 1997, she and
Clinton were huddled in the Oval Office suite engaging in a
sexual act. It was not the first time. But, according to Lewinsky
as revealed under oath to the investigators for the Office of
Independent Counsel, it was unusual because of what the
president told her. “He suspected that a foreign embassy was
tapping his telephones, and he proposed cover stories,” the
Starr report says. “If ever questioned, she should say that the
two of them were just friends. If anyone ever asked about their
phone sex, she should say that they knew their calls were being
monitored all along, and the phone sex was just a put on.”
In his own testimony before a federal grand jury, Clinton
denied the incident. But later — much later — he admitted to
improper behavior and was impeached but not convicted. U.S.
District Court Judge Susan Webber Wright found him to have
obstructed justice. Curiously, Starr never informed Congress
whether the Lewinsky tale was true. For that matter, according
to Insight’s sources, Starr never bothered to find out from
appropriate agencies, such as the FBI or the CIA, whether the
monitoring by a foreign government of the president’s
conversations with Lewinsky occurred.
Insight has learned that House and Senate investigators did
ask questions about these matters and in late 1998 were told
directly by the FBI and the CIA (among others) that there was
no truth to the Lewinsky claim of foreign tapping of White
House phones. Moreover, Congress was told there was no
investigation of any kind involving any foreign embassy or
foreign government espionage in such areas.
But that was not true. In fact, the FBI and other U.S.
agencies, including the Pentagon, had been working furiously
and painstakingly for well over a year on just such a secret
probe, and fears were rampant of the damage that could ensue
if the American public found out that even the remotest
possibility existed that the president’s phone conversations
could be monitored and the president subject to foreign
blackmail. To the FBI agents involved, that chance seemed less
and less remote.
The FBI has become increasingly frustrated by both the
pace of its investigation and its failure to gain Justice
Department cooperation to seek an indictment of at least one
individual suspected of involvement in the alleged Israeli
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 5 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
telephone intercepts. National security is being invoked to
cover an espionage outrage. But, as a high law-enforcement
source says, “To bring this to trial would require we reveal our
methods of operation, and we can’t do that at this point – the
FBI has not made the case strong enough.” Moreover, says a
senior U.S. policy official with knowledge of the case: “This is
a hugely political issue, not just a law-enforcement matter.”
‘You’ve Got the Crown Jewels’
If spies wanted to penetrate the White House, a facility
widely considered the most secure in the world, how might it
be done? For that matter, how might any agency or department
of government be penetrated by spies?
“Actually, it’s pretty easy if you know what you’re doing,”
says a retired U.S. intelligence expert who has helped (along
with other government sources) to guide Insight through the
many and often complicated pathways of government security
and counterespionage.
Access to designs, databases, “blueprints,” memos,
telephone numbers, lists of personnel and passwords all can be
obtained. And from surprising sources. Several years ago this
magazine was able to review from a remote site information on
the supposedly secret and inaccessible White House Office
Data Base, or WHODB (see “More Personal Secrets on File @
the White House,” July 15, 1996).
Despite the spending of additional millions to beef up
security when the White House installed a modern $30 million
computerized telephone system a few years ago,
communications security remains a big problem. Whatever the
level of sophistication employed, there are soft underbellies
that raise significant national-security problems. And potential
for espionage, such as electronic intercepting of phone calls, is
very great.
Calls to or from the White House dealing with classified
information are supposed to be handled on secure lines, but it
doesn’t always happen. Sometimes, according to Insight’s
sources, despite the existence of special phones at the White
House and elsewhere to handle such calls, some don’t use them
or only one side of the call does. An Insight editor recently was
allowed for demonstration purposes to overhear a conversation
placed over an unsecured line involving a “classified” topic.
Carelessness always has been a problem, but former and
current FBI special agents say that under the Clinton
administration the disregard for security has been epidemic.
Many officials simply don’t like the bother of communicating
on secure phones.
In another instance, Insight was provided access to
virtually every telephone number within the White House,
including those used by outside agencies with employees in the
complex, and even the types of computers used and who uses
them. Just by way of illustration, this information allowed
direct access to communications instruments located in the
Oval Office, the residence, bathrooms and grounds.
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 6 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
With such information, according to security and
intelligence experts, a hacker or spy could target individual
telephone lines and write software codes enabling the
conversations to be forwarded in real-time for remote recording
and transcribing. The White House complex contains
approximately 5,800 voice, fax and modem lines.
“Having a phone number in and of itself will not
necessarily gain you access for monitoring purposes,” Insight
was told by a senior intelligence official with regular contact at
the White House. “The systems are designed to electronically
mask routes and generate secure connections.” That said,
coupling a known phone number to routing sequences and
trunk lines would pose a security risk, this official says.
Add to that detailed knowledge of computer codes used to
move call traffic and your hacker or spy is in a very strong
position. “That’s why we have so many redundancies and
security devices on the systems — so we can tell if someone is
trying to hack in,” says a current security official at the White
House.
Shown a sampling of the hoard of data collected over just a
few months of digging, the security official’s face went flush:
“How the hell did you get that! This is what we are supposed to
guard against. This is not supposed to be public.”
Indeed. Nor should the telephone numbers or locations of
remote sites or trunk lines or other sundry telecommunications
be accessible. What’s surprising is that most of this specialized
information reviewed by Insight is unclassified in its separate
pieces. When you put it together, the solved puzzle is
considered a national-security secret. And for very good
reason.
Consider the following: Insight not only was provided
secure current phone numbers to the most sensitive lines in the
world, but it discovered a remote telephone site in the
Washington area which plugs into the White House
telecommunications system.
Given national-security concerns, Insight has been asked
not to divulge any telephone number, location of high-security
equipment, or similar data not directly necessary for this news
story.
Concerning the remote telecommunications site, Insight
discovered not only its location and access telephone numbers
but other information, including the existence of a secret “back
door” to the computer system that had been left open for
upward of two years without anyone knowing about the
security lapse. This back door, common to large computer
systems, is used for a variety of services, including those
involving technicians, supervisors, contractors and security
officers to run diagnostic checks, make repairs and review
system operations.
“This is more than just a technical blunder,” says a wellplaced
source with detailed knowledge of White House security
issues. “This is a very serious security failure with
unimaginable consequences. Anyone could have accessed that
[back door] and gotten into the entire White House phone
system and obtained numbers and passwords that we never
could track,” the source said, echoing yet another source
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 7 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
familiar with the issue.
Although it is not the responsibility of the Secret Service to
manage equipment systems, the agency does provide
substantial security controls over telecommunications and
support service into or out of the White House. In fact, the
Secret Service maintains its own electronic devices on the
phone system to help protect against penetration. “That’s what
is so troubling about this,” says a security expert with ties to
the White House. “There are redundant systems to catch such
errors and this was not caught. It’s quite troubling.… It’s not
supposed to happen.”
Insight asked a senior federal law-enforcement official
with knowledge of the suspected Israeli spying case about the
open electronic door. “I didn’t know about this incident. It
certainly is something we should have known given the scope
of what’s at stake,” the official says.
Then Insight raised the matter of obtaining phone numbers,
routing systems, equipment sites, passwords and other data on
the telecommunications systems used by the White House:
How hard would it be for a foreign intelligence service to get
this information? “Obviously not as hard as we thought,” a
senior government official said. “Now you understand what
we’re facing and why we are so concerned.”
That’s one reason, Insight is told, the White House phone
system is designed to mask all outgoing calls to prevent
outsiders from tracing back into the system to set up taps.
However, knowing the numbers called frequently by the White
House, foreign agents could set up listening devices on those
lines to capture incoming or outgoing calls. Another way of
doing it, according to security experts, is to get inside the
White House system. And, though it’s considered impossible,
that’s what they said about getting the phone numbers that the
president uses in his office and residence.
Like trash, information is everywhere — and often is
overlooked when trying to tidy up a mess.
— PMR and JMW
‘So What, It’s Only Israel!’
There is a tendency in and out of government to minimize
the impact of Israeli espionage against the United States
because Israel is a friendly country. That overlooks the gravity
of the espionage threat, says David Major, former director of
counterintelligence programs at the National Security Council.
“This ‘don’t worry about allied spying, it ’s okay’ attitude is
harmful,” he warns. “The U.S. should expect that the rest of the
world is bent on rooting out its national-security secrets and the
secrets that could subject its leaders to blackmail.” Minimizing
or excusing “friendly spying,” he argues, only discourages
vigilance and encourages more attacks on U.S. national
security. “I’m not outraged by nations that find it in their
interests to collect intelligence but by our unwillingness to
seriously pursue counterintelligence.”
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 8 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006
Major, now dean of the private Center for
Counterintelligence and Security Studies, asks: “What price
should Israel pay for this? My predictions are that there will be
no impact whatsoever. Do we put our heads in the sand or do
we take it as a wake-up call?”
Others observe that Israel has passed stolen U.S. secrets to
America’s adversaries. The government of Yitzhak Shamir
reportedly provided the Soviet Union with valuable U.S.
documents stolen by Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard. “It’s the
security equivalent of herpes,” says a former U.S. antiterrorism
official now at a pro-Israel think tank who requested
anonymity. “Who gets it [beyond Israel] nobody knows....
Once we let it happen, the word gets out that ‘you can get away
with this.’”
— JMW
l Click here for reprint information.
l Email this article to a friend.
l Print this article in an easy-to-read format.
Return to top of page. Jump to home page.
Copyright © 2000 News World Communications, Inc.
Web site developed by Griffin Strategy Group
InsightMag.com - FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House Page 9 of 9
file://I:\2000%2005%2029%20FBI%20Probes%20Espionage%20at%20Clinton%20White%20House.ht​m 10/25/2006

ZB please provide the cache url as that's impossible to read

Quote:ZB please provide the cache url as that's impossible to read

There is no cache link anymore. It is an article I have saved since 2001. It is in PDF format. I will include it (insha'allah) in my friend's next torrent upload (wink,wink) :

9-11 2000 05 29 FBI Probes Espionage at Clinton White House.pdf
9-11 2000 07 33 Israeli Eavesdropping on White House Telephones.pdf
9-11 2001 09 18 5 Israelis Detained for Puzzling Behavior After WTC Tragedy.pdf
9-11 2001 09 27 Instant Messages To Israel WARNED 2hrs B4 WTC Attack.pdf
9-11 2001 10 01 Govt guards found so-called Israeli students trying to get into secure buildings.pdf
9-11 2001 10 06 Mossad capable of US attack US Army officials Say.pdf

Quote:That figures

Always use Sex to nail the politicians

I know, isn't it ridiculous? I mean they could have nailed him with SOOOOO much shit. But no, it has to be the prez getting sucked off by a really ugly intern.

I meand Blossom ugly:



The guy was prez FFS, he could have had any number of hot women. He should have been impeached for his poor choice in women including but not least of all his wife.


MMM